[quote=“Sivasubramaniam.T, post: 25002, member: 22852”]Hi Tom,

I have tried the kernel with few others models. Its working absolutely fine with some new models.

[B]Good Working with below Models :[/B]
Dell Latitude 5420
Dell Latitude 6420
Dell Latitude 5440
Lenovo L440

[SIZE=3][B]Delay in loading kernel with below models :[/B][/SIZE]
Dell Vostro 3400
Dell Vostro 3460
Dell Vostro 3450 (i3)

[SIZE=3][B][I]Problem :[/I][/B][/SIZE] Its taking 4 to 5 minutes to load the kernel to perform any tasks.
[COLOR=#ff6600]esas2r : driver will not be loaded because no ATTO esas2r devices were found [/COLOR]
[COLOR=#ff6600]i2c-parport-light: adapter type unspecified [/COLOR]
After 5 minutes its performing the tasks in a normal way.
[ATTACH]640[/ATTACH]

[B]Problematic Model :[/B]
Dell Vostro 3450 (i5)

Kernel have stopped at this line once the kernel is loaded
[COLOR=#ff6600]esas2r : driver will not be loaded because no ATTO esas2r devices were found [/COLOR]
[COLOR=#ff6600]i2c-parport-light: adapter type unspecified [/COLOR]
[COLOR=#ff6600]IP-Config:Reopening network devices.[/COLOR]…
No Process after this.
[ATTACH]638[/ATTACH]

Sorry for long description. Please help in solving this issue.[/quote]

AN EMERGENCY ON YOUR PART DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ONE ON MINE!

I realize you want help, but I can’t possibly tell you why or what is wrong. The esas2r message doesn’t mean anything, but it’s telling you that the kernel has not found that driver and can’t load it. same with the i2c-parport-light.

What the kernel’s doing after that I don’t know. It’s fast on some, slow on others, and yet others it doesn’t work at all. I don’t know what to say to help.

The best I can do is recompile and try different things.

But I don’t have the systems to build against.

I’m sorry that my kernels have failed you thus far!

Awesome Tom It works!

And one more thing, the pxe boot is much faster than earlyer 🙂

you’re welcome.

[B]systemctl enable servicename.service[/B]

That should set them to start on boot.

Fedora’s docmentation:
[url]http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Deployment_Guide/ch-Services_and_Daemons.html[/url]

Excellent! Haha that’s a great solution. Thank you very much.

The error was because I had the image set to single partition, when there were two partitions on disk. The first partition was a Dell recovery partition.

For the interested, I recorded a video of the original graphics problem: [media=youtube]KQtLIqUWeQk[/media]

Hi,
my english is not good, sorry. Into my east german school I must learning the russian language …

The SSD-Image is “downloaded” properly. The “upload” or “deployed” I will testing into the future ( one or two hours). I seeing freeze of the Client from time to time …
Yes, the FOG-Host is a very slowly Pentium4-Machine.

Thank you for the answer and I wish you a good time.

Glad to hear it’s working.

currently, 3.13.6

A 64 bit kernel is not compatible with a 32 bit init.gz. The 32 bit kernel I provide is the same as the 64, but in 32 bit mode.

[url]https://mastacontrola.com/fogboot/kernel/bzImage32[/url]

many thanks chad and eric , this has saved my bacon , please keep up the good work

laptop/netbbok is an asus x552c , had to disbale uefi , blast hdd to remove gpt format and use the custom kernel above

BIG UP TO YOU ALL from a linux/ubuntu fog newbie

Hi Tom,

after I have now removed the broken network-hub and now again use the FOG Version 0.32 , everything seems to work very satisfactorily .

I have learned over the past few days a lot about Linux and FOG.
If, nevertheless, again if problems arise , I am back.

Once again many thanks for the support with my first steps with FOG and friendly greetings.

Tom,
I tried your bzImage from your Feb 11th post and it did not work on a Lenovo M93z that I have. I did download the bzImage from Chris and it does work. So it appears that something is still missing from yours. Thanks for your efforts in keeping FOG current!

[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 24175, member: 7271”]That’s more advanced than I know at this point.[/quote]

ah i see…ok no worries then.

unfortunately it doesn’t. And i have no clue why the downloaded file is shown as an archive instead of a binary file.
That the filesize differs significantly (i guess it was 6mb instead of 11mb) is not relevant, right?

Do you have an idea what i could do or test?

Yes I did try. Thank you for your suggestion. Still no luck. I think the problem has been narrowed down to the x131 having an advanced format drive. Any options that you know of to get around this?

@danvaida : by curiosity, have you been able to use FOG with these Lenovo ?

[quote=“JimW, post: 23671, member: 15518”]Yes, sorry, kernel 3.8.8 worked fine.[/quote]

Yes, it sure did! Thanks!

yes. Tom keeps this kernel up to date.

Thank you, sorry working on all the bug fixes.

Current version is 3.13.5 incase anyone’s wondering.

Thanks heimer14!

That link will definitely be useful!