@Dominique If you’re able to, I’d highly suggest to snapshot the server first, or otherwise ensure you have a path to reinstall php down to 7.2 just incase updating to 8.X breaks your 1.5.10 availability.

No, you shouldn’t need to re-install fog after updating PHP, but it also wouldn’t hurt anything (but again I highly recommend snapshotting if possible just due to the age of 1.5.10 vs the stable branch code base.)

@Tom-Elliott Thanks fo the quick reply!
I did rerun the installer today and it seems to be working now, thanks a lot for the quick feedback and fix!

@Coolguy3289 I believe we fixed the problem, please confirm and I can solve this thread, thank you!

@piaFOG26 Are you able to confirm if things are now working for you?

Thanks @Tom-Elliott . That actually makes a lot more sense now. 😁

I saw the greyed-out “Mass edit” button, but hadn’t worked out that I had to select multiple items (turn them blue) from the filtered list of hosts in order to be able to use that button to set values across multiple entries. Once I did, it worked as intended.

@delacroix fixparts went missing from FOS during a Buildroot update. The fix (fos#195) landed yesterday, and the first build with it is EXP_20261021-160109. I checked that release: /usr/sbin/fixparts is present in init.xz, init_32.xz, and arm_init.cpio.gz.

Your debug task boots the init that your FOG server serves, not the one you downloaded. Put the new file in place on the server:

cd /var/www/html/fog/service/ipxe mv init.xz init.xz.old wget https://github.com/FOGProject/fos/releases/download/EXP_20261021-160109/init.xz sha256sum init.xz

The hash must match the init.xz.sha256 on the release page (it starts 8e3457ad4268add5). To check the content without a boot:

xz -dc init.xz > /tmp/init.img debugfs -R "ls -l /usr/sbin" /tmp/init.img | grep fixparts

Then run the capture again. If fixparts is in that listing and the capture still fails, please post the output of fixparts /dev/sdX (or /dev/nvme0n1) from a debug task.

@Tom-Elliott sorry tom yes i am, sorry for the late reply, tbh i think its just hp machines that do this

@Tom-Elliott

Thank you!

As you thought, it was a double DHCP server… Even though .6 was in bridge mode, the DHCP server on it was still enabled, unlike the other MikroTik switches we have. Disabling it brought the iPXE booting back. I’ve run a re-inventory task and am now running an image capture task.

I’ll have to keep a future eye open for that as we expand our classroom network.

Cheers!

@robertkwild The issue most likely is not coming from the flip of Secureboot On/Off.

Unsigned or test-signed boot drivers. This is where a real BSOD can happen. If the machine has bcdedit /set testsigning on or nointegritychecks, and a boot-start driver depends on that (an unsigned storage or RAID driver, some sketchy anti-cheat, a dev build), turning Secure Boot on makes those settings get ignored. If the storage driver doesn’t load, you get INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE. That one only happens in the off-to-on direction.

@Paladin1 Thanks, that explains the registration error. Registration reads the machine’s disk, so it needs a disk attached. With no disk it stops with that message every time. That is expected, so you do not need the debug task.

For your question: neither. Do not reinstall anything yet.

The BIOS boot mode on this machine applies to both the network boot and the installed OS. Your image is a UEFI install, so this machine has to network boot in UEFI too. We can try a different iPXE file for UEFI that loads its own network driver. That can avoid the firmware error.

On the FOG server:

Edit /etc/kea/kea-dhcp4.conf. In the classes FOG-UEFI-64-1, FOG-UEFI-64-2, FOG-UEFI-64-3 and FOG-Surface-Pro-4, change "boot-file-name": "snponly.efi" to "boot-file-name": "ipxe.efi". Run sudo systemctl restart kea-dhcp4-server. Set the target BIOS back to UEFI and network boot it.

Tell us if you get the FOG menu or the same ASSERT. If it fails, change the file back. A re-run of the installer also puts snponly.efi back.

@Tom-Elliott said in Login to delete image not passing correct username.:

@mmaus Would you mind updating to the latest RC or even the working-1.6 branch, if that’s too much a leap, what about upgrading to dev-branch? (It will become stable on Sunday if I recall the timing correctly.) See if we already fixed the problem you’re seeing?

I attempted to migrate to the 1.6…my server looks like it just migrated from 1.5 to the same 1.5 version, but it does look like it cleared up whatever issue it was having. Feel free to close this ticket.

Thanks