• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Fog_Newb
    F
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 55
    • Posts 260
    • Groups 0

    Fog_Newb

    @Fog_Newb

    18
    Reputation
    14
    Profile views
    260
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    Fog_Newb Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by Fog_Newb

    • It looks like FOG is working with Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

      SOLVED

      I was on 18.04 and ran “sudo do-release-upgrade -d”, It finished, I rebooted and was able to access the FOG web interface and deploy an image. I am running the latest stable version: 1.5.8

      UPDATE: I had some issues when I upgraded to 20.04 on a different FOG box. It has been resolved.

      Thanks

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: PHP 8 support

      @sebastian-roth The error during the FOG install on 21.10 is related to installing php 8.0 mysql

      Error

      If I try to manually install php8.0-mysql it appears to be installed already

      Already installed

      The GUI works fine and capturing an image goes smoothly until the end where the database needs to be updated

      Wow, so I ran the FOG installer again, this time there wasn’t an error when it came to the mysql install.

      All good?

      Going to try capturing an image now.

      Hmm. It still fails to update the database.

      Failed

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: It looks like FOG is working with Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

      @Sebastian-Roth

      Yes.

      I just want to add real quick, the DC 7800’s can boot to the menu with any kernel and without and kernel parameters. They fail when deploying.

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Secure Boot Support for Windows 11

      I installed the leaked dev version 21996/21996.1 on bare metal and in a VM. Secure Boot didn’t have to be enabled . UEFI and TPM (which requires CSM to be disabled) had to be. Secure Boot - the option only had to be present.

      After more testing. I found I could install it in a VM as Legacy. I guess MS laxed on the VM requirements?

      I also found on metal, I could disable TPM and enable CSM which should make secure boot completely unavailable. Then I deploy a sysprep-ed Win 11OOBE UEFI image on it without any problems.

      I will try pure legacy on metal next…

      This was with that leaked dev build so who knows if it was modified or what not and how close it is to the actual dev build release or the final release.

      posted in Feature Request
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • Include partclone 3.20?

      3.13 that comes on the latest dev-branch as of today has issues with APFS on my laptop.

      pic

      3.20 x64 does not

      pic

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Fog Dashboard shows one queued. How do I clear this?

      @Sebastian-Roth

      Hell yeah dude, that cleared it right up.

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: FOG 1.5.9-RC2 incompatible with Windows 10 v2004 Partition Structure

      @Sebastian-Roth

      Not sure if this has been resolved or if this helps -

      I’ve created a Win 10 UEFI VM using the 2004 ISO. VMware® Workstation 15 Pro 15.5.6 build-16341506. All the settings were default except I went up tp 8GB of RAM. I installed it, ran all the updates, activated it while waiting for updates, rebooted twice then captured the image with FOG dev-branch version: 1.5.9-RC2.11 running on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

      It deployed fine to a similar VM.

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Include partclone 3.20?

      @sebastian-roth Thanks. I just updated to the latest. So far it is capturing an APFS drive on a hackintosh no problem.

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: NVMe madness

      @Sebastian-Roth

      So yes, this is a perfect solution since Primary host disk can now be set by size. I have one image for the OS disk, and one for the “D” drive. I just switch the Primary Host disk setting depending on which image I want to capture or deploy.

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: UGH T2 Chip nightmare - Anyone using FOG with T2 macs

      @george1421 I boot from a FOS usb stick that pxe boots to the FOG server. So I am thinking put the T2 Kernel on the server and specify that kernel under the “host kernel” setting for the macs, then on the the FOS stick put the t2 kernel as well?

      posted in Mac Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb

    Latest posts made by Fog_Newb

    • RE: [Problem] Storage Node connection issues after updating to FOG 1.6

      @Tom-Elliott Oh

      sshd.txt

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Stuck at resizing after successful capture.

      @Tom-Elliott psst… https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/18001/problem-storage-node-connection-issues-after-updating-to-fog-1-6

      The interface looks nice though 🙂

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • [Problem] Storage Node connection issues after updating to FOG 1.6

      Hi all,

      Not sure if this is a bug but…

      I recently upgraded my FOG server (running in a VM on Ubuntu 24.04) from 1.5.x to 1.6. The upgrade process went smoothly with no errors, but afterwards I ran into a problem: the Default Storage Node could not connect. In the Web UI, “Test Connection” kept failing with an error about username/password not matching.

      Here’s what I’ve done so far to troubleshoot:

      Checked the .fogsettings file – confirmed the management username (fogproject) and password were correct.

      Verified FTP manually – I was able to ftp localhost as fogproject using the same password, and it worked fine.

      Checked the database – logged into MariaDB and confirmed that the nfsGroupMembers table had the correct ngmUser and ngmPass matching .fogsettings.

      Looked at the hostname – saw that ngmHostname for DefaultMember was set to the server’s LAN IP (10.1.1.100). I tried updating it to 127.0.0.1 instead, restarted the FOG services (FOGImageReplicator and FOGSnapinReplicator), but the connection still fails.

      Restarted services and re-tested multiple times, no change.

      Here’s the output of systemctl status | grep FOG showing all services running:

      FOGFileDeleter.service
      ├─1048 php /opt/fog/service/FOGFileDeleter/FOGFileDeleter
      └─1115 php /opt/fog/service/FOGFileDeleter/FOGFileDeleter
      FOGImageReplicator.service
      ├─1054 php /opt/fog/service/FOGImageReplicator/FOGImageReplicator
      └─1116 php /opt/fog/service/FOGImageReplicator/FOGImageReplicator
      FOGImageSize.service
      ├─1059 php /opt/fog/service/FOGImageSize/FOGImageSize
      └─1117 php /opt/fog/service/FOGImageSize/FOGImageSize
      FOGMulticastManager.service
      └─1062 php /opt/fog/service/FOGMulticastManager/FOGMulticastManager
      FOGPingHosts.service
      ├─1071 php /opt/fog/service/FOGPingHosts/FOGPingHosts
      └─1131 php /opt/fog/service/FOGPingHosts/FOGPingHosts
      FOGScheduler.service
      ├─1074 php /opt/fog/service/FOGTaskScheduler/FOGTaskScheduler
      └─1133 php /opt/fog/service/FOGTaskScheduler/FOGTaskScheduler
      FOGSnapinHash.service
      ├─1076 php /opt/fog/service/FOGSnapinHash/FOGSnapinHash
      └─1135 php /opt/fog/service/FOGSnapinHash/FOGSnapinHash
      FOGSnapinReplicator.service
      ├─1082 php /opt/fog/service/FOGSnapinReplicator/FOGSnapinReplicator
      └─1137 php /opt/fog/service/FOGSnapinReplicator/FOGSnapinReplicator

      So far, I’ve confirmed:

      Credentials are correct (FTP works).

      Database values match .fogsettings.

      Tried both LAN IP and 127.0.0.1 as hostname.

      All FOG services are running.

      Still unable to get the storage node to pass the connection test in the Web UI.

      Has anyone else run into storage node connection issues after moving to the 1.6 branch? Did something change in how the node authenticates compared to 1.5.x?

      Thanks for any advice!

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Stuck at resizing after successful capture.

      @Tom-Elliott

      Hi, turns out, I had some funk on my network. It was happening on just one machine. I wiped everything, and I mean everything, router, wifi access point, phone, NAS, tablets, PC’s macs, TV’s then rebuilt from scratch, changed all passwords, authenticator everything, new keys… ugh. Rough weekend but all better now. Happy to report the latest FOG dev version is running great, although FOGMulticastManager is leaving zombie processes. I’m about to update to working 1.6 just to check it out.

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • Stuck at resizing after successful capture.

      Fog 1.5.10.1716 Ubuntu Server 24.04.3 LTS

      I am experiencing an issue after updating to the latest dev version (see pic). Over the last few releases, FOG has been having problems resizing NVMe drives or producing unusual errors. These errors appear during capture or after deployment, ranging from “Could not adjust bad sector list” to “1 cluster outside the volume.” Usually, a complete drive wipe and Windows reinstall resolves the issue, even though the drive and volume are clean. chkdsk /x/f/r

      I previously solved the “1 cluster outside the volume” error by restoring the previous image, shrinking and expanding the Windows partition, and trying again. Unfortunately, that method does not work in this case. I am now stuck at this point:

      alt text

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Unable to check in

      @Tom-Elliott Hi Tom, Thanks… I updated to 1.5.10.1692 and was able to deploy a 2 day old image to the PC. I updated some things on the PC, mostly with Steam and display settings then went to capture an image from it again and ran into the same problem mention in the OP. Only this time, I was able to take a pic.

      I ran chkdsk prior to capturing and it came up clean

      alt text

      UPDATE: So I tried everything for the ntfsresize error … turns out, I had to shrink the partition in windows a bit then expand it. After that, I could capture.

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Unable to check in

      @Tom-Elliott

      Some additional info. I believe I was able to successfully capture an image of this PC right after updating to 1.5.10.1688. on Aug 26th. I am restoring a back up FOG from that time to a new VM to see.

      UPDATE: So I restored the FOG server back up from a couple of days ago to a new VM and yes, I was able to back up the PC once after updating to 1688.

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Unable to check in

      @Tom-Elliott

      Here it is. It is packed

      error.log

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • Unable to check in

      I updated to 1.5.10.1688 and attempted to capture an image. Win 10 resizable whole disk. It captured the main partition then failed at some point. I couldn’t see the error on the screen. The drive is now too borked to boot into Windows. So I tried to deploy an image I took before the update to the PC but was unable to check in

      alt text

      An idea on how to fix?

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott Fog now tells me the latest dev version and the one I have is 1.5.10.1671

      alt text

      Was 1.5.10.1771 all a bad dream or were we both mistakenly calling 1.5.10.1671 1.5.10.1771?

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb