@lucamathuse No, I would not move the files manually yet.

If the capture reports “Cloned successfully” but the task remains In-Progress, then the capture itself may have finished, but the post-capture process is not completing correctly. Under normal conditions, the host should finish the task and then reboot or shut down automatically based on your settings.

So, before moving anything by hand, I would want to know whether the host is actually stuck there indefinitely or whether it is still finishing something in the background. If it never updates the task status, that could also explain why your image set ends up incomplete or inconsistent.

@hariskar

I didn’t really catch the described use case…
But anyway, if application stores something in the database, then the database need to be backed up, of course. Fully and incrementally also (separate logic).

If you use application that stores data in the same machine where it is installed, better would be to configure it to store data on the remote database, e.g on specific database server or some other way.
You can create network drive or other remote storage and point your database files there - if needed to be separate (for each PC).

This way you have all the data in the same place, and you can make backups of this server or drive more easilly.

Backuping entire PC with database in it - this can be done, but why?
It feels strange.

Example:
Lets say, employees in your company are working with important documents.
Do you really want to backup of entire PC (with os and applications and data), instead of storing those documents on secure and reliable remote storage?
Better solution is to simply make network location (local or in cloud) and let the users to store documents there - so the documents would not be lost if some pc dies.
If PC dies, then you simply replace the pc and deploy ready to use system image.

@lucamathuse
I don’t remember if it’s related to Win11 we have this in our postdownload script :

if [ -n "$hd" ]; then if [ "$hd" = "/dev/nvme0n1" ] ; then partsys=$hd'p2' partdata=$hd'p3' else partsys=$hd'2' partdata=$hd'3' fi

We use Virtualbox, install classic WIndows 11, disable Bitlocker, and capture with FOG with image set to “Multiple Partition Image - All Disks”
My folder capture :

d1.mbr d1p1.img d1p2.img d1p3.img d1p4.img d1.partitions d1.size

Maybe try capture debug to see which partition FOG get during your capture

@lucasgfaj have you turned off secure boot?

@trent_potter Yes you figured it out. Sysprep is a Windows utility, it has nothing to do with FOG. It is always recommended to sysprep before capturing an image.

@Tom-Elliott
I did not update yet to 1824, but i did SELECT * FROM HISTORY;

MariaDB [fog]> SELECT * FROM history; +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ | hID | hText | hUser | hTime | hIP | +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ | 1 | [2026-04-01 08:33:55] MulticastSession ID: 1 NAME: test has been successfully updated. | fog | 2026-04-01 08:33:55 | 10.10.3.116 | +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ 1 row in set (0.000 sec)

the new session i create are not shown, and dont work until i run the maintenance queries

then it shows in history table:

MariaDB [fog]> SELECT * FROM history; +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ | hID | hText | hUser | hTime | hIP | +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ | 1 | [2026-04-01 08:33:55] MulticastSession ID: 1 NAME: test has been successfully updated. | fog | 2026-04-01 08:33:55 | 10.10.3.116 | | 2 | [2026-04-01 09:10:37] MulticastSession ID: 1 NAME: test has been successfully updated. | fog | 2026-04-01 09:10:37 | 10.10.3.116 | +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ 2 rows in set (0.000 sec)

@devle I’ve made a couple of edits, though I still cannot replicate the problem you’re seeing.

You shouldn’t see the errors any more (just saying), though I don’t know if these things will fix whatever problem you’re seeing.

@Tom-Elliott All good the last update fixed the issue!

@BLT I don’t necessarily have a timeline for the final release but I did just release an experimental kernel with a newer nic driver. It may work for you if you want to give it a try.

@Infojoe And a real question : How can I mark this as “solved” ?

My workarounds for update on Debian Trixie are:

A)
git checkout master ; git pull
userdel fogproject
cd bin ; ./installfog.sh

or
B)
apt install lastlog2
git checkout master ; git pull
ln -s /usr/bin/lastlog2 /usr/bin/lastlog
cd bin ; ./installfog.sh

Peter

@george1421 I probably found the reason of disSYNC of fog password and FOG settings. My old fog generated password included an & char (password looked like q&Y**********) but after some updates I found q&#38#38#38…********** in FOG_TFTP_FTP_PASSWORD and Storage Management Password.

To solve thi issue , I used https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/11203/resyncing-fog-s-service-account-password bit first I changed password in /opt/fog/.fogsettings.

Then update

update FOG_TFTP_FTP_PASSWORD update Storage Management Password, delete fogproject user (debian 13 installer bug lastlog vs. lastlog2) rerun installfog.sh

Now kernel update (tftp access) is working again.

As a workaround, we’re doing deploy in these Appliances by Schedule Deploy Tasks, as it bypass the authentication screen. But i would be interesting if we could do deploys without this need.

I think this is an issue envolving this kind of nic hardware (Intel I226-V). I opened an issue (18125) where I have some appliances for pfsense, they have got four NICs with this kind of hardware, and we are not getting successfull to deploy an image because it’s not processing authentication, even typíng correct user and password.