@hancocza let me remote in and debug the issue. The installer had a bug which prevented it from pinning a server over https if port 80 was blocked. This has been fixed in v0.11.14, which will be released with the next server RC.
I remove the binary package and re-ran the installer. Then uninstalled 0.11.3 on one of my machines and install 0.11.2. It updated from the server to version 0.11.3.
@uwpviolator You should be able to use the new client, but it won’t automatically update. As far as the communications between the client the server, nothing has changed.
The only other difference, your devices won’t automatically update to 0.11.13, unless you download the files from github, place them in place of your current files (under /var/www/fog/client/), and then edit the /var/www/fog/lib/fog/system.class.php FOG_CLIENT_VERSION line to 0.11.13.
@tom-elliott Should I assume this is an Evince problem because it is not viewable and seek other options or is there something funky with the PDF generated from htmldocs. Do you have a Ubuntu 16.04.3 install to test this. Just wondering if wkhtmltopdf could be used instead. I could investigate this further for you if you like.
I’ll mark this solved as the AD joining issue is actually solved. Please open a new thread if you still have the group assignment issue after the DB maintenance.
While George’s solution might have worked for the “bug” the cleaner solution is probably doing it right with the partition order…is it “frech” to mark my own post as solution?
I was in the throes of migrating all our images over to 10v1709 so I was only just barely able to accomplish what I’ve detailed above before I had to return the unit to its owner.
I believe I’ve found and fixed the task active tasks page to refresh properly and stop displaying completed tasks. I tested this very minimally as I don’t have my normal dev environment setup currently.
It appears to be working properly, and should be fixed for RC-11.
As I don’t have a means to properly test this issue, I am not going to solve it, but just wanted to give a heads up so people don’t think it’s just been forgotten.
I’m solving this topic for now. @Jim-Graczyk if you are still having the issue, mind creating a new one? I will work on this in the meantime, but I would much prefer a new bug report for the issue (after updating to latest rc of course) .
Marking solved as this was not a bug, it really was a valid db connection not being able to be made. (this means the storage nodes it was asking for could not communicate to the main server).