• Partitions is too big for the disk

    9
    1 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    A

    @sebastian-roth to fix-it, i have changed owner, changrp and chmod.
    Thanks for you help 🙂

  • 0 Votes
    29 Posts
    18k Views
    J

    @george1421
    Merci cela à fonctionner avec bzImage553 👍
    Bonne continuation
    JCH

  • ProxyDHCP responding to PXE boot in different subnet

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    3k Views
    george1421G

    @mstabrin Ok that is the answer I just came up with. For every foreign subnet you will need to add in a new dhcp-range value.

    Well done finding the solution. I also learned something new today too about adding multiple ranges.

  • Lenovo M75s-1 boot on uefi

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    S

    @amirbfc said in Lenovo M75s-1 boot on uefi:

    “Could not select: Exec format error (http://ipxe.org/2e008081)”

    Is secure boot disabled in the UEFI settings?

  • Database engine MyISAM - upgrade FOG?

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    S

    @dominique said in Database engine MyISAM - upgrade FOG?:

    Any idea when 1.6.0 will be general available?

    There is no timeline for this yet. Many people use FOG but very few help working on it. So things are going very slow at the moment. We’ll bring out a last 1.5.x release (1.5.10) to finish up that line and then the next will be a first 1.6 release (months down the road).

    If you are keen to get InnoDB earlier you can follow the topic Goerge posted. From my point of view this should be possible in 1.5.x setups as well. But we won’t officially support this and don’t want to push out for a major change in the 1.5.x branch anymore.

  • Fog on Proxmox ?

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    8k Views
    george1421G

    @huecuva said in Fog on Proxmox ?:

    I’m just having issues booting my HTPC from ipxe for some reason I can’t figure out.

    Please start a new thread so we can discuss

  • API Token change

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    788 Views
    Tom ElliottT

    @alesser Not really unfortunately.

    The token you see on the screen is stored in the fogserver in a different mechanism. What you see is an encrypted string compared to what is actually stored in the FOG Server.

    If you have the original “plain text” value, it should work (even if you don’t see the same key) as it’s still referencing the same “plain text” value.

  • FTP Windows Storage Node

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    3k Views
    george1421G

    @victor-r Interesting… there must be some other code that is doing that. Rerun the fog installer to put things back.

    Just to be sure I’m looking in the right area, you are trying to replicate your images from the FOG server to the windows storage node or are you trying to capture directly to a windows storage node?

  • server 2019

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    3k Views
    Z

    @sebastian-roth not really, there are a few references to the same problem, and only one person said they were successful by taking the undionly.kpxe file from a debian 10.4 installation.

    I will complete this image on a physical machine, it not a big issue. It is just super convenient when working remotely that’s all.

    Thanks for taking to time to reply.

    Zufar

  • New Lenovo M75s don't Connect to FOG

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    george1421G

    @bluedude For a longer term solution I would implement the dhcp policies from the document Sebastian provided. That solution will help you when you have a mix of bios and uefi systems on your campus.

    BUT for a test right now, replace undionly.kpxe with snponly.efi then try to pxe boot that troubled target computer. Understand when you move away from the bios boot loader the bios systems will fail to pxe boot. But what we are looking at right now is/does snponly.efi resolve uefi booting on this troubled computer. Once you find out then put back the undionly.kpxe file until you can get the dhcp policies setup. I can tell you they do work because I have them setup in my environment.

  • Setup FOG with MDT/WDS on same network

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    george1421G

    @vemoya All I can say you get what you’re paying for.

    Create a new iPXE menu that looks similar to this.

    Menu Item: os.chainwdsimaging
    Description: Boot WDS Imaging Solution
    Parameters:
    cpuid --ext 29 && set warch x64 || set warch wx86
    iseq ${platform} pcbios && set bootfname wdsnbp.com ||
    iseq ${platform} efi && set bootfname wdsmgfw.efi ||
    chain -ar tftp://10.254.0.155\\boot\\${warch}\\${bootfname}
    boot || goto MENU
    Menu Show with: All Hosts

    The script parameters looks a bit complicated but it basically checks to see if the target is x86 or x64 and uefi or bios to pick the right location and file name to boot.

    Understand that for pxe booting there is two methods and it appears you are using both in your setup.

    There is the static mode where you define dhcp options 66 and 67 listing statically the boot server and file name to use. In your case your dhcp server looks like you have policies defined to switch between uefi and bios boot files this is good.

    The second method you are using is called proxy dhcp this is where you add your pxe boot server (WDS or FOG running dnsmasq) to the last host in your dhcp-helper service on your router. Both WDS and FOG running dnsmasq will respond with the proper boot file when it hears a dhcp discover from the target computer (this is why you have it listed in the dhcp helper service). The proxydhcp server (WDS or dnsmasq) will only provide the pxe boot information leaving your main dhcp server to provide the rest of the boot information. If you have a proxydhcp server configured its settings will override the static settings you have defined in dhcp options 66 and 67.

    The reason why I’m telling you this, if you don’t stop the proxydhcp service on WDS it could respond to proxy boot requests giving you a random boot experience. Its ok to have static and dynamic assigned boot files, just know that proxydhcp will override static settings, when you can’t figure out why things are working as intended.

    Be aware I did not test the script above only wrote it on the fly without much thought. YMMV

  • Intermittent PXE-E32: TFTP Open Timeout

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    T

    @george1421

    That appears to have resolved it! Thanks!

  • Deploy on older computers (HP dc7600)

    Solved
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    D

    @george1421 Hello, tsc=unstable worked! Thanks. Since some of the computers don’t belong to our campus, and just come here to be reimaged, I tried to apply that parameter in the settings in all clients and it didn’t give us compatibility issues with more modern systems (I tested for example in HP Elite 8200’s and it worked perfectly).

    Thank you for your assistance! 🙂

  • Other web interface?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    796 Views
    S

    @Vango The upper picture shows the new FOG version 1.6 we keep working on since a long time, mostly it’s @Tom-Elliott’s great work.

    The version is confusing as the work in this branched off at around FOG 1.5.7 and has not been updated to 1.6.x for some time as it was still a very early alpha version not quite ready for production. It’s great to hear you have been using it for a year now already! We are still working on it and hope to release an official 1.6.x in the next months.

    You can get the current stage of it as we work on it by checking out the branch working-1.6.

    Let us know if there is anything that needs fixing.

  • DHCP server is not starting on startup

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    S

    @brakcounty While I can imagine an upgrade to break things in rare cases I would not think this would happen for a service like ISC-DHCP which has been around for so many years. But hey, you never know. Everything is possible.

  • After image deploy bios settings are changed?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    S

    @wmw509 Give the steps outlined by George a try but I can imagine this being caused by some fancy logic within the UEFI firmware. As George said FOG is not at all touching any firmware or boot settings… unless you have added post deploy scripts doing something special.

    Here is another test: Schedule the deploy task as debug. When you get to the shell run efibootmgr command (don’t know if you need parameters or not from the top of my head) and take a picture of the output in screen. Now start the task with command fog and step through it. At the end run efibootmgr again, take a picture and compare/post here. Before you type reboot schedule another debug task for this machine and see if it PXE boots into it.

  • Vostro 5590 "NBP File downloaded successfully"

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    784 Views
    george1421G

    Ok lets hit the common things here.

    What exactly do you have configured for dhcp option 67? I’m going to guess the computer is in uefi mode so dhcp option 67 needs to be ipxe.efi.

    Ensure that secure boot is disabled

    Not an issue at the moment but will be.

    Make sure the disk mode in the bios (firmware) is configured for ahci mode not the default of Raid-On.

    Ensure you update the FOS Linux kernel via the web ui by going to FOG Configuration -> Kernel Update. Make sure you download both the 64 and 32 bit kernel for 5.6.18. You will need this kernel to support the newest hardware.

  • Can't net boot into Fog

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    R

    My bad!! Disregard the last. I had changed to ipxe.efi in scope section only … not sever options. Fixed that and it’s booting to Fog now.

    Thanks so much!!

  • Incompatibilidade com Dell series 300.

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    2k Views
    K

    @george1421 Sim, bem esquisito mas esta funcionando, so registro que nao esta funcionando corretamente neste caso ate troquei para BZImage412.

  • Need Help with Capture and Hard Drive Issue

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    S

    @bluedude Thanks for the update. Unfortunately I have not a clue what could have been wrong with those disk that kept your machine form even booting up. No idea really. Looks pretty alright in the pictures.

79

Online

12.6k

Users

17.5k

Topics

156.3k

Posts