• Upgraded to FOG 1.5.10.1629 but now can't capture image

    Unsolved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    377 Views
    Tom ElliottT

    @wilsol you’re downgrading the kernel version, not FOG. These versions exist and while generally having the bleeding edge is fine, sometimes the bleeding edge is … well… problematic. Will there be a fix? Most likely, when we know exactly what’s causing and can produce a patch, notify the kernel development team what we find, or disable the offending piece once we know what it is and what (if any) it impacts by being disabled. Until then, using the slightly older version is the workaround/fix.

  • unable to install CA certificate

    Solved
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    17k Views
    rogalskijR

    Version 1.5.10.1629
    Environment - Dell Poweredge server running Alma Linux 9.5

    Not to dredge up an old forum post, but I experienced this same error after migrating from an old CentOS server to newer hardware and Alma Linux. (What apparently many are moving to now).

    For me the issue seemed to be related to trying to pull an image from a laptop that had the previous client on it. I have 2 computers that I use as dedicated imaging devices, 1 laptop and 1 desktop. I uninstalled the old FOG client, but when installing the new client and attempting to point it to the server, I got the CA Certificate error mentioned on the “Pinning” stage of the install. I tried to find an old cert on the device itself, with no luck.

    What I ended up attempting after doing a little digging was to add back the following Windows firewall rules. I did that, and it seemed to kick over immediately and installed on the very next try. I am unsure if this is coincidence or if the firewall rules truly needed to be on the device before installing. But it worked after that and I now have a successfully pulled base image like I utilized on the previous server. The rules I used in an elevated command prompt are below. Perhaps someone from the FOG community can comment on the accuracy of my firewall rules? Good luck and hope this helps someone in need!

    netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=“Fog Client” dir=in action=allow program=“%ProgramFiles(x86)%\FOG\FOGService.exe”
    netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=“Fog Shutdown” dir=in action=allow program=“%ProgramFiles(x86)%\FOG\FOGShutdownGUI.exe”
    netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=“Fog Tray” dir=in action=allow program=“%ProgramFiles(x86)%\FOG\FOGTray.exe”
    netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=“Fog Update Helper” dir=in action=allow program=“%ProgramFiles(x86)%\FOG\FOGUpdateHelper.exe”
    netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=“Fog Update Waiter” dir=in action=allow program=“%ProgramFiles(x86)%\FOG\FOGUpdateWaiter.exe”
    netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=“Fog User Service” dir=in action=allow program=“%ProgramFiles(x86)%\FOG\FOGUserService.exe”

  • Problem deploy slow

    Unsolved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    291 Views
    george1421G

    @alexamore90 Lets try to unpack this.

    You have 3 ESXi servers connected to an unmanaged switch.

    This part is a bit unclear. After deploying on a few pcs the speed dropps to 900mb/min (watch your unit of measure). Normally its up to 22GB/min (again assuming you are getting this number from partclone).

    After deploying to a few PCs the speed drops. Is this simultaneous deployments or consecutive deployments the speed drops?

    Unmanaged switch: So this isn’t an enterprise class switch. You may have issues with throughput on the switch itself. The aciscs might not be fast enough for the amount of data your are trying to push through. Look at the throughput listed in the technical documentation for the switch.

    You didn’t mention the uplink speed from the ESXi servers to this switch. On a well managed 1GbE network you should get around 6GB/min throughput. On a well managed 10GbE network I’ve seen 13-15GB/min. So your 22GB/min seems a bit higher than expected. I can say with a physical FOG server connected via 1GbE link, I can saturate that 1GbE link with 3 concurrent image deployments. When that happens the error rate increases and the throughput drops off quote a bit.

    The other thing if you are trying to do concurrent deployments with these 3 FOG servers, make sure the drives on ESXi are SSD or NVME drives and not spinning disks for performance reasons.

    In the end I don’t think this is a FOG server issue specifically, rather something in the environment that is causing the speed issue.

  • Compile error

    Unsolved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    462 Views
    Mr_____TM

    Just checking in here to Mark this as SOLVED. I had added the dev branch under a different folder. So the mix up was between the chair and the keyboard. Performed @Tom-Elliott Recommendations and reinstalled from my primary install and it is now working. trying to pxe boot MacBookPro’s. That’s another story, for another thread.

  • what makes an image, call for a fog.postdownload script?

    Unsolved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    356 Views
    G

    @Tom-Elliott

    Ok thanks @Tom-Elliott - that helped me. I had a script that was failing and trying to find logs for it was difficult to get a location that it could write to, that I could find after the deployment, and i couldn’t see if it was erroring or whatever… running in deploy debug was really helpful. Thanks.

  • Conflict (content) while updating FOG server to newest version

    Unsolved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    100 Views
    No one has replied
  • Pas de capture

    Unsolved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    300 Views
    george1421G

    @ALV_SUPECOLES This seems to be similar to this thread: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/17759/ipxe-initialising-devices

    In this case uefi firmware was updated then iPXE stops at initializing devices. If compiling and installing the latest version of iPXE doesn’t solve the problem then we will have to wait for either iPXE developers or Lenovo to fix the problem. https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/15826/updating-compiling-the-latest-version-of-ipxe

  • Problems With PXE OVER IPVA4

    Unsolved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    289 Views
    george1421G

    @nicolas-moraes We have to be careful some Soho routersthe don’t behave well with pxe booting. Some will put its IP address as the boot server even if you have dhcp option 66 configured. I don’t know the edgerouter, but if there is a bootp option make sure that is turned on too.

    The edgerouter is based on vyos so it should behave correctly. Make sure when you define dhcp option 66 its the IP address of the fog server and for dhcp option 67 the boot file name needs to be all lower case. Make sure you don’t have a leading or trailing white space in the name.

    If you have double checked everything then get a witness computer and load wireshark on it. Make sure you setup a capture filter of port 67 or port 68 start the scanning then pxe boot the computer until you get the error message then stop scanning.

    What you are looking for is the DORA sequence
    Discover (sent by target computer, akin to hello world, please configure me)
    Offer (sent by one or more dhcp server, I would there to be only one of these and from your edgerouter).
    Request (sent by the target computer)
    Ack/Nack (sent by the dhcp server)

    The interesting packet will be the OFFER.

    Look at the packet, there should be an ethernet header section with the following fields.
    Next-Server: this should be the IP address of your fog server (this is the bootp part)
    Boot-FIle: this should be the name of the ipxe file to load.

    If either of those are blank some pxe clients will not boot if they look at the bootp fields.

    In the dhcp options section you should see option 66 and 67 that should mirror the values in the bootp part.

  • Issue with FOG Deployment - Disk Not Bootable After Deployment (Debian 12)

    Unsolved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    349 Views
    D

    @Tom-Elliott Thank you Tom. I change the UUID’s by the devices names on the /etc/fstab on the “golden” machine before I capture a new image and I redeploy it, but apparently it doesn’t change anything

  • Stuck on Saving Partition Tables (MBR)

    Unsolved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    257 Views
    D

    ok, got it.

    My storage pool had the other IP address, once I changed the IP of the storage pool to same subnet has the machine I am trying to clone, it went smoothly.

    It is now copying at 257MB/min… is that good ?

  • What is /bin/fog.download?

    Unsolved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    376 Views
    S

    @george1421 Gotcha. Thanks for the reply. I’ll post a picture of the error when I’m able to get back to testing next week.

  • Fogclient and token.dat missing

    Unsolved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    165 Views
    No one has replied
  • SNAP INS. Lets talk about them...

    Unsolved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    903 Views
    D

    @Tom-Elliott

    Yeah, this was my suspicion. I see both sides of it too. Sounds like I’ll have to either super simplify some of my install scripts and make some sacrifices or figure out another solution.

    I appriciate the response and confirmation!

  • pxe booting using dhcp from home router

    Solved
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    Mr_____TM

    This thread is quite old. Just here to mark it solved. I did manage to set my isp’s router as the dhcp server and successfully captured an image.
    Thanks for all your suggestions and help.

  • Capture UEFI image on hyper-v VM

    Solved
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    L

    @Tom-Elliott said in Capture UEFI image on hyper-v VM:

    6.1.89

    Thanks, this worked for me.

    When tasking a host, I’d get the same as @Baessens (Hyper-V).

    I went to kernel update and installed 6.1.89 as per Tom’s suggestion and I was able to get past and into image deployment!

  • FTP Error

    Unsolved
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    809 Views
    K

    @Tom-Elliott
    I could send you any log-info you guide me.
    Too bad no one could help this problem.
    I had so time consuming setting up this great project.
    Do you might now anyone else i could send a message maybe?A remote session somehow?
    Thanks for the effort anyway.

  • FOG on Proxmox use UEFI booting.

    Solved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    395 Views
    R

    I had a problem when capturing an image when the computer was in legacy mode, when it was in UEFI mode everything worked. Then I reinstalled FOG on PROXMOX and I didn’t check Legacy mode anymore, but now I just tested imaging in legacy mode and everything works. That’s why I thought it was somehow dependent on whether fog was installed in UEFI/Legacy mode. Topic to close then.

  • 0 Votes
    13 Posts
    1k Views
    D

    @Tom-Elliott Thanks for the clarification, but please let me know if I can at least somehow avoid resizing the current partitions (especially boot partition), such as by checking Multiple Partition Image - Single Disk (Not Resizable) - (2)?

  • CSS Web Customization

    Solved
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    L

    Hello,
    I have a prod server and a test server
    To differentiate them, I would lid like to change the default “blue theme” to a green theme.
    Which lines should I modifi in de fog.css files ?

  • http 5xx server error

    Unsolved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    235 Views
    D

    Hello, it looks something is wrong with you backend.
    Are you able to open from the browser:

    http://192.168.1.22/fog/service/ipxe/boot.php http://192.168.1.22/fog/service/ipxe/bzImage

    ?

105

Online

12.2k

Users

17.4k

Topics

155.6k

Posts