• Is there a special procedure for SSDs?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    ch3iC

    @Andrew-Farney Just upload my HP Elitebook 820 with SSD (with trunk) and download without problem šŸ˜‰
    @Wayne-Workman said:

    Upgrade to trunk and you can choose your partitions.

    https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Upgrade_to_trunk

  • Failure imaging Dell XPS 13 9343 w/ Dell USB ethernet adapter

    Solved
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    P

    @Wayne-Workman Thanks. We’ll give that a try and report back in a few days.

  • Nodeclient plugin - Purpose?

    Solved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    N

    Ah. I see. Thanks.

  • Isos bootable trying to add to my menu Fog !! I fail ...

    Unsolved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    Wayne WorkmanW

    @Eze84d Normally, the complete ISO is loaded into memory before it boots… how big is the ISO ? Do you have enough space left in RAM for it to fit?

  • FOG Checksum

    Unsolved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    952 Views
    Wayne WorkmanW

    @Marc2 Probably yes and no… and it depends on when you do the checksum…

    If you are using FOG’s early hostname change, then a simple changing of the name on the OS disk would totally change the checksum. Booting the computers before the comparison is likely to totally change the checksum. The checksum must be done before namechange and before boot.

    This means you’d have to either schedule a shutdown after imaging and then boot to a linux live CD and do the checksum test, or, do a debug deployment and cancel the process right at the early host name change point and manually do the checksum during debug (which has very limited commands and you’d probably need to install some utilities right then and there) and then proceed to manually finish the imaging process via command line.

    I found this post on another site:

    But it depends on the layer you define ā€œsameā€

    For this answer I assume

    /dev/sdb1 and /dev/sdc1 are the ones you want to compare both partitions are not mounted if they are mounted, you have the permission to read each file

    You can test the two partitions on blocklevel.
    ie:
    Code:

    md5sum /dev/sdb1 md5sum /dev/sdc1

    But for this to produce the same hash, the partitons have to be exactly the same.
    Even the slightest change in one of the files in either of the two,
    will produce a different hash.

    You can also test on filelevel.
    There are probably already tools, that could be used for your purposes (tripwire maybe?),
    but a quick-and-dirty solution can be this:
    Code:

    mkdir ~/comparedir sudo mkdir /mnt/test_sdb1 sudo mkdir /mnt/test_sdc1 sudo mount -o ro /dev/sdb1 /mnt/test_sdb1 sudo mount -o ro /dev/sdc1 /mnt/test_sdc1 find -type f /mnt/test_sdb1 -exec md5sum {} 2>/dev/null \; >~/comparedir/tmp_sdb1_hashes find -type f /mnt/test_sdc1 -exec md5sum {} 2>/dev/null \; >~/comparedir/tmp_sdc1_hashes sudo umount /mnt/test_sdb1 sudo umount /mnt/test_sdc1 sudo rm -r /mnt/test_sdb1 sudo rm -r /mnt/test_sdb1 sort -k2 ~/comparedir/tmp_sdb1_hashes > ~/comparedir/sdb1_hashes sort -k2 ~/comparedir/tmp_sdc1_hashes > ~/comparedir/sdc1_hashes rm ~/comparedir/tmp_sdb1_hashes ~/comparedir/tmp_sdc1_hashes diff ~/comparedir/sdb1_hashes ~/comparedir/sdc1_hashes

    Source: http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/miscellaneous/158910-can-i-compare-two-partitions.html

  • Fog 1.2.0 question

    Unsolved
    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    Wayne WorkmanW

    @nengelhardt Export your images and host list, build up a new Fedora 22 server build, install FOG trunk, and import your hosts and images, then recreate your ā€œimage definitionsā€. Then set your DHCP option 066 to reflect the (possibly) new IP address.

    The easiest way to accomplish this is to run in parallel for a little while. Although many people don’t just have spare servers or powerful desktops laying around to dedicate to a new FOG server… But if you did, it’d be as easy as mounting the remote NFS share on the new FOG server to a temporary directory, and then copying over your images. The host export bit is just done in the web interface under Host Management. You may not even need or want to do this if you have only a few machines registered.

    If you don’t have spare hardware laying around, you’ll need to connect to a remote windows share and just copy your images there (recursively). You would then later connect to that share via Fedora 22 Server and copy them back (CLI recursively).

    Here is an article on the various ways to move to FOG Trunk. You don’t need any pre-existing version of fog to install FOG trunk… The article name is deceiving but it was written for the needs of the many (upgrading). https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Upgrade_to_trunk

  • Upgrade 1.2.0 Install/Update Error

    Unsolved
    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    6k Views
    C

    @Wayne-Workman Screen Shot 2015-07-02 at 9.20.13 AM.png This is a picture of the first 2 of 113 errors I get. I can post them all but it will take a long time. lol. Also I try backing up my FOG Configs but when I get to the FOG Configuration section in FOG there is not a Configuration Save section. I see this: Screen Shot 2015-07-02 at 9.29.08 AM.png

  • Updating FOG while imaging is running...

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    473 Views
    No one has replied
  • FOG as a DRS Server Deployment

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    6k Views
    V

    Setup FTP and NFS on the storage array and use it directly, rather than trying to NFS into the VM and NFS out of it again.

  • Peek into .img files

    Solved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    5k Views
    DeastromD

    Neat, I’ll have to give this a shot. Thank you guys.

  • FOG EMMC compatability

    Unsolved
    20
    0 Votes
    20 Posts
    8k Views
    J

    thanks for that , i have ammended that file with the proxy details but still getting error 403

  • Can I copy images to multiple HDs in server or SAN

    Solved
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    R

    OK, ta. Probably will go FOG then for PXE boot installs, and investigate using a Linux shell script for copying images to local/SAN drives.

    Question answered, just not sure how to mark it as such.

  • Instructions for updating the Kernel

    Solved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    T

    For the time being I am on 3501, once I get through the bunches of systems I have to image I will be keeping up with trunk, just don’t need anything to break right now, so staying put where I got it working.

    I will just update to SVN later on and be good to go with the Kernel.

  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    5 Views
    No one has replied
  • Thank You FOG Team!

    2
    5 Votes
    2 Posts
    942 Views
    Joseph HalesJ

    I second that emotion you guys are awesome.

  • Storage Node replication question

    Unsolved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    ch3iC

    @sbps As said @Wayne-Workman the solution is to used ā€œLocation Pluginā€ with differents ā€œstorage groupā€ (one group per location) and use another tools to sync images between storages, because (I think) the replication is between nodes in a same group.

  • Ideal FOG Setup

    19
    1 Votes
    19 Posts
    9k Views
    Wayne WorkmanW

    @MRCUR said:

    I do hope when 1.3.0 launches, the old client is still supported as it is in the current SVN’s. That way I can work on removing the legacy client from existing machines and installing the new client. Otherwise it’s going to be a long time until many machines get the new client as we do not reimage all that quickly with 8,000+ hosts.

    @Developers Probably something to consider there…

    I, too, am partial to the legacy client… it’s a fall-back, at the least.

  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    14 Views
    No one has replied
  • Bit Torrent

    20
    0 Votes
    20 Posts
    13k Views
    D

    You go, /u/Junkhacker! I would love to have bit torrent sync, so long as it allows me to lower my overall deployment time when doing 6+ clients.

    I can’t use multicast because that hurts our network in a VERY bad way (all network traffic basically halts), so I use 5 concurrent single casts typically to about 30 computers at a batch.

    Thus, whatever you do, my deplying to 6-10 clients takes about 2x as long as 1 client does. If the torrent send can reduce that number for 6+ to 1.5x of 1-5 clients, then I would be extremely happy and would find great benefit for my company.

    If it works as good as possible, I would expect total deployment time for 30 clients to be like 15-20% of what it currently is.

  • Update Fog Client.

    Unsolved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    Wayne WorkmanW

    lol… so now on I’ll just say ā€œUpdate to Latest Trunkā€

187

Online

12.3k

Users

17.4k

Topics

155.6k

Posts