• FOG Secure Boot with Shim

    Tutorials
    8
    2 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    T

    @KMEH Well, it must be another image I couldn’t attach. I’ve honestly dedicated many hours to this without success. I’ve seen another project called foguefi (https://github.com/abotzung/foguefi), compatible with Secure Boot directly, without using MOK, and it works. It’s just that when you select options like quickreg or deploy an image, it takes forever. But the point is, it works with recursive boot enabled. It shouldn’t be that complicated.

    Anyway, do you have a list of commands to configure it? Maybe I or the AI ​​is missing something.

  • 0 Votes
    18 Posts
    1k Views
    J

    @pillbox1234567 Thanks for the suggestion. I turned Viridian off on the cloned VM, and it did not make a difference.

    Interesting note that you’ve seen it cause boot issues on certain Linux VMs. I have not experienced that behavior yet but will keep an eye out for it.

  • Boot and Nuke/Disk Wipe PXE Menu - Any Method Welcome!

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    J

    @Preston Wow that was a super answer, thanks Preston! I’ll give this a go in the week. 🙂

  • FOG hangs on "... free base memory after PXE unload"

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    Tom ElliottT

    @Exsival When you say “Causing the fog server to crash” what exactly do you mean?

    If it’s just a “saying” I can understand that but from a technical standpoint what this means is completely different and would need logs. If all you mean is the machine in quesiton is hanging, that’s a different issue altogether. I highly doubt the whole FOG Server is crashing.

  • Upgrading Server To SSD and Reinstall

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    148 Views
    No one has replied
  • HP Z2 G1i Workstation failing to PXE

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    169 Views
    No one has replied
  • Filters duplicating from table to others

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    176 Views
    I

    @Infojoe I forgot an important information : version 1.5.10.1826

  • Partition 3 (NTFS) skipped during deployment

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    163 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    149 Views
    M

    @lucamathuse No, I would not move the files manually yet.

    If the capture reports “Cloned successfully” but the task remains In-Progress, then the capture itself may have finished, but the post-capture process is not completing correctly. Under normal conditions, the host should finish the task and then reboot or shut down automatically based on your settings.

    So, before moving anything by hand, I would want to know whether the host is actually stuck there indefinitely or whether it is still finishing something in the background. If it never updates the task status, that could also explain why your image set ends up incomplete or inconsistent.

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    209 Views
    No one has replied
  • Fog as a backup tool?

    General
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    131 Views
    H

    @hariskar

    I didn’t really catch the described use case…
    But anyway, if application stores something in the database, then the database need to be backed up, of course. Fully and incrementally also (separate logic).

    If you use application that stores data in the same machine where it is installed, better would be to configure it to store data on the remote database, e.g on specific database server or some other way.
    You can create network drive or other remote storage and point your database files there - if needed to be separate (for each PC).

    This way you have all the data in the same place, and you can make backups of this server or drive more easilly.

    Backuping entire PC with database in it - this can be done, but why?
    It feels strange.

    Example:
    Lets say, employees in your company are working with important documents.
    Do you really want to backup of entire PC (with os and applications and data), instead of storing those documents on secure and reliable remote storage?
    Better solution is to simply make network location (local or in cloud) and let the users to store documents there - so the documents would not be lost if some pc dies.
    If PC dies, then you simply replace the pc and deploy ready to use system image.

  • Windows 11 | 65x HP Z2 Tower G1i

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    650 Views
    M

    @kratkale said in Windows 11 | 65x HP Z2 Tower G1i:

    Can I specify in FOG which hard drive to clone to? For example, using the serial number? That could be stored in the host entry

    Hi, this is a known issue when using NVMe, as you’ve probably already discovered. I’m not sure whether FOG 1.5 supports using serial numbers to target disks, but someone from the team may be able to confirm that. FOG 1.6, however, does support targeting disks by serial number.

    I ran into the same situation. As a workaround, I customized my init.xz to use the PCI path instead, since those appear to be more persistent.

  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    186 Views
    F

    @lucamathuse
    I don’t remember if it’s related to Win11 we have this in our postdownload script :

    if [ -n "$hd" ]; then if [ "$hd" = "/dev/nvme0n1" ] ; then partsys=$hd'p2' partdata=$hd'p3' else partsys=$hd'2' partdata=$hd'3' fi

    We use Virtualbox, install classic WIndows 11, disable Bitlocker, and capture with FOG with image set to “Multiple Partition Image - All Disks”
    My folder capture :

    d1.mbr d1p1.img d1p2.img d1p3.img d1p4.img d1.partitions d1.size

    Maybe try capture debug to see which partition FOG get during your capture

  • Database Error when select a group

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    412 Views
    M

    @Tom-Elliott Hi, has there been any development with this?

    I’m facing a situation that’s not quite identical but very similar in my 1.6.0-beta.2297.

    I already posted to the Forum with the details I thought were relevant, but noticed my FOG status is showing the same messages that are posted here.

  • Fog Scheduler running at 100% CPU + SSH connection flood between nodes

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    217 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    383 Views
    Tom ElliottT

    @lucasgfaj have you turned off secure boot?

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    41 Views
    No one has replied
  • Sysprep in FOG?

    General
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    101 Views
    R

    @trent_potter Yes you figured it out. Sysprep is a Windows utility, it has nothing to do with FOG. It is always recommended to sysprep before capturing an image.

  • Detected Hardware unit hang

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    347 Views
    No one has replied
  • image Multicast issue

    Unsolved FOG Problems
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    465 Views
    B

    @Tom-Elliott
    I did not update yet to 1824, but i did SELECT * FROM HISTORY;

    MariaDB [fog]> SELECT * FROM history; +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ | hID | hText | hUser | hTime | hIP | +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ | 1 | [2026-04-01 08:33:55] MulticastSession ID: 1 NAME: test has been successfully updated. | fog | 2026-04-01 08:33:55 | 10.10.3.116 | +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ 1 row in set (0.000 sec)

    the new session i create are not shown, and dont work until i run the maintenance queries

    then it shows in history table:

    MariaDB [fog]> SELECT * FROM history; +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ | hID | hText | hUser | hTime | hIP | +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ | 1 | [2026-04-01 08:33:55] MulticastSession ID: 1 NAME: test has been successfully updated. | fog | 2026-04-01 08:33:55 | 10.10.3.116 | | 2 | [2026-04-01 09:10:37] MulticastSession ID: 1 NAME: test has been successfully updated. | fog | 2026-04-01 09:10:37 | 10.10.3.116 | +-----+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------+---------------------+-------------+ 2 rows in set (0.000 sec)