• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Recent
    Log in to post
    Load new posts
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics
    • All categories
    • All tags
    • S

      Sub 512MB RAM Devices

      Hardware Compatibility
      • • • skyhawk3355
      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      38
      Views

      george1421G

      @skyhawk3355 I remember awhile ago I needed to create a one-off kernel for a system that had a 486 cpu. I checked but I don’t have that kernel any more.

      I just recompiled the linux 6.6.85 for a 586 based CPU. I can recompile for a 486, but I don’t know if that is going to get us anything better.

      Here is 6.6.85 586 version
      https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GAzFjbtpDVXXCRpe6bIZ5mwySSXeDHko/view?usp=drive_link

      Here is 6.6.85 586 where I stripped out some drivers like scsi, nvme, uncommon network drivers, virtualization drivers, etc. I was able to strip out over 1MB of kernel size from the previous one above. Did I through out too much?? YMMV.
      https://drive.google.com/file/d/13dE7BLgofsFiNJj_Q8nLDknplRbWRqkJ/view?usp=drive_link

    • EazisE

      Unsolved ASUS NUC14MNK fos kernel no netwerk drivers

      FOG Problems
      • • • Eazis
      28
      0
      Votes
      28
      Posts
      295
      Views

      george1421G

      @Eazis said in ASUS NUC14MNK fos kernel no netwerk drivers:

      So the 8125 driver was missing?

      Well if you close one eye and squint with the other, you can still see it. The kernel developers consolidated all of the realtek drivers into the 8169 driver which kind of works except the driver updates lags behind the hardware by a few months. It looks like the FOG developers have a way to integrate the official realtek drivers moving forward so that should make life with the reaktek nics easier because realtek releases a new subversion of the hardware every few months.

      Anyway I’m glad you have your issue sorted out and the FOG developers have a plan forward too. @rodluz (well done!)

    • Quintin GiesbrechtQ

      Unsolved FOG Very Slow to Deploy Image - Lenovo Neo 50Q Gen 4

      FOG Problems
      • • • Quintin Giesbrecht
      38
      0
      Votes
      38
      Posts
      1.9k
      Views

      george1421G

      @rodluz said in FOG Very Slow to Deploy Image - Lenovo Neo 50Q Gen 4:

      That is exactly what I did, I disabled the 8169 driver from the kernel config too.

      Good going. That 8125 driver was originally in the linux kernel individually but then the driver was merged into the 8169 unified driver which has not kept up with the realtek hardware changes. I was getting lost trying to integrate a third party driver into the linux kernel. I could compile it as a module and add it to the init.xz but that is not a sustainable solution. If you have it integrated into the kernel for the 8169 (1GbE) and 8125 (2.5GbE) that should cover most of the common network adapters today from realtek (outside of the 10GbE stuff, but those haven’t hit the desktops yet).
      Well done!

    • AxeMeAQuestion22A

      Unsolved Fog iPXE Menu no input

      FOG Problems
      • • • AxeMeAQuestion22
      17
      0
      Votes
      17
      Posts
      586
      Views

      J

      Has there been a solution to this problem? I have tried many versions of FOG, but I can’t input anything on the keyboard when entering the iPEX menu.

    • J

      Unsolved Cannot boot W11 deployment with RAID turned on

      Windows Problems
      • • • jack_darnellits
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      18
      Views

      george1421G

      @jack_darnellits Historically when the intel rst adapter is in raid-on mode linux can’t see the disk behind the raid controller and the sata controller presents itself as a different device depending on the raid mode. When you look at it when its in ahci mode linux will see it as a sata controller, when its in raid mode linux sees it as a different device, not a sata controller but a raid controller with a different device ID.

      So that is all historical information. I’m a bit surprised that you were able to image the system in raid mode with FOG (because of historical experiences). You did the right thing by loading the intel rst driver into your golden image. My past experiences with the intel drive is that you need to make sure you have the right one. I’ve had troubles loading windows from dvd on laptops where its not seeing the drive and getting the right F6 driver seemed to be a real pita.

      With all that said, what I would do is try to get into windows using recovery mode, that may mean booting from a recovery drive. Verify what you are loading into your mother image is the proper intel driver for the OS to see the network drive. Also make sure you have the dell winpe drivers loaded into the golden image too (you can use the pnputil.exe command to load drivers from the expanded cab file). Right after imaging windows first boot is in winpe mode. The real mode drivers might not be available since windows has not really started.

    • M

      Solved Issues with upgrading to FOG 1.5.10 from 1.5.4 on CentOS 7.5.1804

      FOG Problems
      • • • Marcus.Anderson
      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      71
      Views

      M

      There is a BIOS update for the MiniX PCs that allows the PCs to be built from FOG 1.5.4 running on CentOS 7.5.2009.

      I do not know the technicalities but upgrading from verion 6 to 8, was mentioned.

    • JJ FullmerJ

      Powershell API Module

      Tutorials
      • api api help powershell task management fogapi-psmodule • • JJ Fullmer
      32
      4
      Votes
      32
      Posts
      8.6k
      Views

      JJ FullmerJ

      Another Release(s)! 2506.9.22
      https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi/releases/tag/2506.9.22

      2506.9.19-22 are a slew of releases where I kept finding issues in broader tests right after I released each version. So apologies for the over-releasing there.

      Fixed send-fogimage to work with more use cases and utilize more parameters available to scheduled tasks like bypassbitlocker. Also simplified the parameter sets to avoid errors when using the command with different parameter sets. Also added links to PSGallery and chocolatey in each github release going forward.

      Full Release Note History: https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ReleaseNotes/
      Powershell Gallery Listing for this version: https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi/2506.9.22
      Chocolatey Package Listing for this version (may take 1-60 days from release to be approved by chocolatey moderators): https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/FogApi/2506.9.22

    • W

      Unsolved Issues capturing image on Dell Pro 16+ Laptops

      FOG Problems
      • • • wamis
      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      76
      Views

      W

      @george1421 This worked! Thank you so much for your help!

    • J

      Unsolved [BUG] iPXE Boot Loop & Menu Failure After FOG 1.5.10.1660 Upgrade

      FOG Problems
      • • • Jim Holcomb
      16
      0
      Votes
      16
      Posts
      222
      Views

      Tom ElliottT

      @Jim-Holcomb So unfortunately i’m not readily available for a remote assist due to work requirements and duties so I apologize.

      @Jim-Holcomb said in [BUG] iPXE Boot Loop & Menu Failure After FOG 1.5.10.1660 Upgrade:

      After upgrading to the latest FOG version, my PXE boot environment is broken. What used to work flawlessly is now a disaster. PXE clients either hang, enter a loop, or display autoexec.ipxe not found. Sometimes pressing ESC brings up a green DOS-style login prompt, then fails to chainload. Sometimes they hang on “Booting…” indefinitely.

      So this “autoexec.ipxe not found” always shows. This is not an issue. It’s simply saying there’s no file called autoexec.ipxe on your /tftpboot folder. It’s NOT whatever was causing ipxe boot issues. I’m guessing this PXE boot environment was broken due to whatever was changed?

      As to the selective hard drive. I’m not sure I understand what is wrong here. YOu watched it write ONLY to the /dev/nvme drive but somehow it wrote to both the sda and the nvme? Something doesn’t sound right there. Single Disk resizable and Multiple Partition Single disk shoudl only write to a single drive and be done. Do you have video of this process writing to both? I only ask because seeing this in action will help me understand where the code is flawed. To my knowledge, however, it seems more likely that at some point before you wrote to the NVME it had accidentally written to the SDA drive, then you try to figure out how to have it write to the NVME. Then, finally, it was able to write to the NVME, but now it LOOKS like it wrote to both because the SDA drive was never cleared out?

      And yes, d1.mbr is absolutely correct. That’s how it initializes the disk.

    • J

      Unsolved Replication Issues

      FOG Problems
      • • • judzk
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      19
      Views

      No one has replied

    • J

      Unsolved iPXE fog boot menu error Could not boot: Results too large

      FOG Problems
      • • • Jias94
      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      72
      Views

      george1421G

      @Jias94 Hey no worries, I’ve created that error a few times myself so I had a good idea where to look. I’m glad you have it sorted out and can get back to imaging.

    • L

      Unsolved Multicast job

      FOG Problems
      • • • laca3400
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      33
      Views

      No one has replied

    • hariskarH

      Unsolved How much storage is enough for my system?

      FOG Problems
      • • • hariskar
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      55
      Views

      george1421G

      @hariskar It looks like your root partition ‘/’ has 1.8T or 1800GB of space. The command I would have run is df -h to give you usage. but assuming that debian is less that 50GB you should have plenty of space to capture a modern computer with 50GB of data. Use single disk resizable to use zstd to compress that 50GB of data down even smaller.

      What error message are you getting? A screen shot of the error might help set the context of the error.

    • _

      Unsolved I need a solution for my project

      FOG Problems
      • • • _iswaryaaa_
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      39
      Views

      No one has replied

    • B

      Capturing is fast, but deploying is super slow

      General Problems
      • • • brentomp
      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      89
      Views

      O

      @brentomp Kernel issues, see
      https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/17698/fog-very-slow-to-deploy-image-lenovo-neo-50q-gen-4/14

    • phil-dosiP

      Unsolved Problem with FOGImageReplicator.service

      FOG Problems
      • • • phil-dosi
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      23
      Views

      No one has replied

    • C

      Unsolved Kernel Panic After iPXE Boot – Identical FOG Setup Works at Another Site

      FOG Problems
      • • • commonmannowhereman
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      63
      Views

      No one has replied

    • P

      Unsolved erreur capture image depuis la version 1.5.10.1660

      FOG Problems
      • • • pierre.baylet
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      69
      Views

      O

      @pierre-baylet Bonjour, j’ai eu la meme erreur lors de la mise à jour en 1.5.10. J’ai aussi un storage node déporté sur un NAS Synology. J’avais une erreur après la capture, avec un “Update database failed”.
      Il faut que tu refasses les permissions sur ton dossier images/dev sur ton FTP.

      Pour mon syno j’ai fait la manip suivante :
      depuis mon fog en ssh :
      sudo mount -t nfs @IPNAS:/volume1/images /mnt
      chown -R root:users /mnt/dev
      chmod g+s /mnt/dev

    • R

      Unsolved Issues capturing a resizable image in FOG

      Windows Problems
      • • • richie086
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      41
      Views

      No one has replied

    • M

      Deploying ChromeOS Flex with FOG

      General Problems
      • • • miguel.candia.n
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      35
      Views

      No one has replied

    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 9
    • 10
    • 1 / 10