• Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

samba domain integration

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
Linux Problems
8
102
74.1k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P
    plegrand
    last edited by Oct 2, 2015, 7:05 AM

    Here is all my test (netdom, legacy client, new client with log files).
    As it’s litle long i made a pdf document
    http://plegrand1.free.fr/Test_Samba_Domain.pdf

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • P
      plegrand
      last edited by Joe Schmitt Oct 2, 2015, 8:59 AM Oct 2, 2015, 9:07 AM

      I discover something interesting.
      There is a file which log each try domain joining
      c:\windows\debug\NetSetup.LOG

      here is this file with the two tests (legacy and new client)

      NetSetup.LOG with the NEW client (which failed)

      10/02 10:18:24 -----------------------------------------------------------------
      10/02 10:18:24 NetpDoDomainJoin
      10/02 10:18:24 NetpMachineValidToJoin: 'gim-127-13'
      10/02 10:18:24 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
      10/02 10:18:24 NetpMachineValidToJoin: status: 0x0
      10/02 10:18:24 NetpJoinDomain
      10/02 10:18:24 	Machine: gim-127-13
      10/02 10:18:24 	Domain: samba_domain
      10/02 10:18:24 	MachineAccountOU: 
      10/02 10:18:24 	Account: samba_domain\admin_samba
      10/02 10:18:24 	Options: 0x3
      10/02 10:18:24 	OS Version: 5.1
      10/02 10:18:24 	Build number: 2600
      10/02 10:18:24 	ServicePack: Service Pack 3
      10/02 10:18:24 NetpValidateName: checking to see if 'samba_domain' is valid as type 3 name
      10/02 10:18:24 NetpValidateName:  'samba_domain' is not a valid Dns domain name: 0x2554
      10/02 10:18:25 NetpCheckDomainNameIsValid [ Exists ] for 'samba_domain' returned 0x0
      10/02 10:18:25 NetpValidateName: name 'samba_domain' is valid for type 3
      10/02 10:18:25 NetpDsGetDcName: trying to find DC in domain 'samba_domain', flags: 0x1020
      10/02 10:18:25 NetpDsGetDcName: found DC '\\SAMBA' in the specified domain
      10/02 10:18:25 NetpJoinDomain: status of connecting to dc '\\SAMBA': 0x0
      10/02 10:18:25 NetpJoinDomain: OU is specified but couldn't get NT5 DC
      10/02 10:18:25 NetpJoinDomain: status of disconnecting from '\\SAMBA': 0x0
      10/02 10:18:25 NetpDoDomainJoin: status: 0x54b
      10/02 10:19:26 -----------------------------------------------------------------
      

      NetSetup.LOG with the LEGACY client (which works fine)

      10/02 10:50:12 -----------------------------------------------------------------
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpDoDomainJoin
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: 'gim-127-13'
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: status: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpJoinDomain
      10/02 10:50:12 	Machine: gim-127-13
      10/02 10:50:12 	Domain: samba_domain
      10/02 10:50:12 	MachineAccountOU: (NULL)
      10/02 10:50:12 	Account: samba_domain\admin_samba
      10/02 10:50:12 	Options: 0x3
      10/02 10:50:12 	OS Version: 5.1
      10/02 10:50:12 	Build number: 2600
      10/02 10:50:12 	ServicePack: Service Pack 3
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpValidateName: checking to see if 'samba_domain' is valid as type 3 name
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpValidateName:  'samba_domain' is not a valid Dns domain name: 0x2554
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpCheckDomainNameIsValid [ Exists ] for 'samba_domain' returned 0x0
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpValidateName: name 'samba_domain' is valid for type 3
      10/02 10:50:12 NetpDsGetDcName: trying to find DC in domain 'samba_domain', flags: 0x1020
      10/02 10:50:20 NetpDsGetDcName: found DC '\\SAMBA' in the specified domain
      10/02 10:50:20 NetpJoinDomain: status of connecting to dc '\\SAMBA': 0x0
      10/02 10:50:20 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:20 NetpGetNt4RefusePasswordChangeStatus: trying to read from '\\SAMBA'
      10/02 10:50:20 NetpGetNt4RefusePasswordChangeStatus: RefusePasswordChange == 0
      10/02 10:50:20 NetpLsaOpenSecret: status: 0xc0000034
      10/02 10:50:21 NetpManageMachineAccountWithSid: NetUserAdd on '\\SAMBA' for 'GIM-127-13$' failed: 0x8b0
      10/02 10:50:21 NetpManageMachineAccountWithSid: status of attempting to set password on '\\SAMBA' for 'GIM-127-13$': 0x0
      10/02 10:50:21 NetpJoinDomain: status of creating account: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:21 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:21 NetpSetLsaPrimaryDomain: for 'SAMBA_DOMAIN' status: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:21 NetpJoinDomain: status of setting LSA pri. domain: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:21 NetpJoinDomain: status of managing local groups: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:21 NetpJoinDomain: status of setting netlogon cache: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:22 NetpJoinDomain: status of clearing ComputerNamePhysicalDnsDomain: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:22 NetpUpdateW32timeConfig: 0x0
      10/02 10:50:22 NetpJoinDomain: status of disconnecting from '\\SAMBA': 0x0
      10/02 10:50:22 NetpDoDomainJoin: status: 0x0
      10/02 10:53:12 -----------------------------------------------------------------
      10/02 10:53:12 NetpDoDomainJoin
      10/02 10:53:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: 'gim-127-13'
      10/02 10:53:12 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
      10/02 10:53:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: the specified machine is already joined to 'SAMBA_DOMAIN'!
      10/02 10:53:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: status: 0xa83
      10/02 10:53:12 NetpDoDomainJoin: status: 0xa83
      

      May be it could help to find the problem

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        Sebastian Roth Moderator
        last edited by Oct 2, 2015, 9:46 AM

        Well that’s an interesting catch. The difference I see is that the output from the old client says MachineAccountOU: (NULL) whereas the output from the new client seams to be empty but not NULL. Later on it fails with NetpJoinDomain: OU is specified but couldn’t get NT5 DC
        @Jbob Can you think of why this is different? You know the client source code a lot better than I do! Maybe OU is send as empty string (“”) instead of NULL in the new client.

        Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

        Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

        P 1 Reply Last reply Oct 2, 2015, 12:05 PM Reply Quote 0
        • P
          plegrand
          last edited by Oct 2, 2015, 9:51 AM

          On the client windows xp i try this command nltest.exe :

          nltest.exe /dsgetdc:samba_domain
          DC: \SAMBA
          Address: \SAMBA
          Dom Name: SAMBA_DOMAIN
          The command completed successfully

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            plegrand @Sebastian Roth
            last edited by Oct 2, 2015, 12:05 PM

            @Uncle-Frank Just for test i put “NULL” then “(NULL)” into “Organizational Unit” in AD configuration without success

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
              last edited by Oct 2, 2015, 3:06 PM

              Bug confirmed and isolated. Ticket has been made here:

              https://github.com/FOGProject/fog-client/issues/22

              Basic explanation:
              For some reason the samba LDAP domain is returning an error code of 1355 instead of 2 or 50 (which correspond to OU errors). On OU errors the client will try using a null OU. I just have to add 1355 to the cases of OU errors.

              Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

              P 2 Replies Last reply Oct 5, 2015, 7:11 AM Reply Quote 1
              • P
                plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                last edited by Oct 5, 2015, 7:11 AM

                @Jbob Hello, does it means that the new client will works now or do i have to wait the new “patched” client ?
                Any way thanks for your help

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
                  last edited by Oct 5, 2015, 1:25 PM

                  @plegrand The patch will be applied next release.

                  Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Oct 5, 2015, 1:30 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                    last edited by Oct 5, 2015, 1:27 PM

                    @Jbob Just for information , as i don’t know if the client have the patch which permit to join samba domain, i made a test today without success.
                    Same problem. But may be I’ve to wait a little.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
                      last edited by Oct 5, 2015, 1:29 PM

                      The patch will only be applied on the next official release 0.9.6 or 0.10.0

                      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                      P 1 Reply Last reply Oct 6, 2015, 12:29 PM Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                        last edited by Oct 5, 2015, 1:30 PM

                        @Jbob thanks for your answer, for the moment i use the 4103 .
                        Thanks again

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P
                          plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                          last edited by Oct 6, 2015, 12:29 PM

                          @Jbob is there a date for this new release ?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
                            last edited by Oct 9, 2015, 1:03 AM

                            @plegrand

                            No release date is planned. For now keep using the legacy client. The next release of the client will be v0.10.0 which will include OSX + Linux compatibility.

                            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                            Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Oct 9, 2015, 1:17 AM Reply Quote 1
                            • Wayne WorkmanW
                              Wayne Workman @Joe Schmitt
                              last edited by Oct 9, 2015, 1:17 AM

                              @Jbob said:

                              @plegrand

                              No release date is planned. For now keep using the legacy client. The next release of the client will be v0.10.0 which will include OSX + Linux compatibility.

                              That’s what I’m waiting for!

                              That is gonna blow minds left and right.

                              Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
                              Daily Clean Installation Results:
                              https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
                              FOG Reporting:
                              https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
                                last edited by Joe Schmitt Nov 11, 2015, 10:04 PM Nov 12, 2015, 3:57 AM

                                @plegrand v0.9.6 is released, and this includes the Samba fix. (https://news.fogproject.org/client-v0-9-6/)

                                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                                P 2 Replies Last reply Nov 12, 2015, 7:14 AM Reply Quote 1
                                • P
                                  plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                                  last edited by Nov 12, 2015, 7:14 AM

                                  @Jbob Wonderful !!!
                                  I was waiting for this !!
                                  I’m going to test today and i’ll tell you the result
                                  thanks again !!!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • P
                                    plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                                    last edited by Feb 4, 2016, 12:35 PM

                                    @Jbob Hello
                                    In first sorry for this long delay
                                    I just made the test today with the latest client. Everything seems to work fine !!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • 1
                                    • 2
                                    • 3
                                    • 4
                                    • 5
                                    • 6
                                    • 5 / 6
                                    • First post
                                      Last post

                                    167

                                    Online

                                    12.0k

                                    Users

                                    17.3k

                                    Topics

                                    155.2k

                                    Posts
                                    Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project