• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    samba domain integration

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Linux Problems
    8
    102
    74.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      plegrand
      last edited by plegrand

      @Jbob You mean the c:\fog.log ?
      I’ll send you tomorrow and i’ll try to be clear in my explanation 😉

      @Tom-Elliott i’ll update tomorrow to make a try

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Tom ElliottT
        Tom Elliott @Joe Schmitt
        last edited by

        @Jbob As you and I have verified in browser (with the context printing properly) the values appear to be fixed. However, you will have to update the stored value in the database. There is a possibility this will be unneeded, but I say better to be sure than just try.

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

        Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

        Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          plegrand
          last edited by

          Here is all my test (netdom, legacy client, new client with log files).
          As it’s litle long i made a pdf document
          http://plegrand1.free.fr/Test_Samba_Domain.pdf

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            plegrand
            last edited by Joe Schmitt

            I discover something interesting.
            There is a file which log each try domain joining
            c:\windows\debug\NetSetup.LOG

            here is this file with the two tests (legacy and new client)

            NetSetup.LOG with the NEW client (which failed)

            10/02 10:18:24 -----------------------------------------------------------------
            10/02 10:18:24 NetpDoDomainJoin
            10/02 10:18:24 NetpMachineValidToJoin: 'gim-127-13'
            10/02 10:18:24 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
            10/02 10:18:24 NetpMachineValidToJoin: status: 0x0
            10/02 10:18:24 NetpJoinDomain
            10/02 10:18:24 	Machine: gim-127-13
            10/02 10:18:24 	Domain: samba_domain
            10/02 10:18:24 	MachineAccountOU: 
            10/02 10:18:24 	Account: samba_domain\admin_samba
            10/02 10:18:24 	Options: 0x3
            10/02 10:18:24 	OS Version: 5.1
            10/02 10:18:24 	Build number: 2600
            10/02 10:18:24 	ServicePack: Service Pack 3
            10/02 10:18:24 NetpValidateName: checking to see if 'samba_domain' is valid as type 3 name
            10/02 10:18:24 NetpValidateName:  'samba_domain' is not a valid Dns domain name: 0x2554
            10/02 10:18:25 NetpCheckDomainNameIsValid [ Exists ] for 'samba_domain' returned 0x0
            10/02 10:18:25 NetpValidateName: name 'samba_domain' is valid for type 3
            10/02 10:18:25 NetpDsGetDcName: trying to find DC in domain 'samba_domain', flags: 0x1020
            10/02 10:18:25 NetpDsGetDcName: found DC '\\SAMBA' in the specified domain
            10/02 10:18:25 NetpJoinDomain: status of connecting to dc '\\SAMBA': 0x0
            10/02 10:18:25 NetpJoinDomain: OU is specified but couldn't get NT5 DC
            10/02 10:18:25 NetpJoinDomain: status of disconnecting from '\\SAMBA': 0x0
            10/02 10:18:25 NetpDoDomainJoin: status: 0x54b
            10/02 10:19:26 -----------------------------------------------------------------
            

            NetSetup.LOG with the LEGACY client (which works fine)

            10/02 10:50:12 -----------------------------------------------------------------
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpDoDomainJoin
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: 'gim-127-13'
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: status: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpJoinDomain
            10/02 10:50:12 	Machine: gim-127-13
            10/02 10:50:12 	Domain: samba_domain
            10/02 10:50:12 	MachineAccountOU: (NULL)
            10/02 10:50:12 	Account: samba_domain\admin_samba
            10/02 10:50:12 	Options: 0x3
            10/02 10:50:12 	OS Version: 5.1
            10/02 10:50:12 	Build number: 2600
            10/02 10:50:12 	ServicePack: Service Pack 3
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpValidateName: checking to see if 'samba_domain' is valid as type 3 name
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpValidateName:  'samba_domain' is not a valid Dns domain name: 0x2554
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpCheckDomainNameIsValid [ Exists ] for 'samba_domain' returned 0x0
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpValidateName: name 'samba_domain' is valid for type 3
            10/02 10:50:12 NetpDsGetDcName: trying to find DC in domain 'samba_domain', flags: 0x1020
            10/02 10:50:20 NetpDsGetDcName: found DC '\\SAMBA' in the specified domain
            10/02 10:50:20 NetpJoinDomain: status of connecting to dc '\\SAMBA': 0x0
            10/02 10:50:20 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:20 NetpGetNt4RefusePasswordChangeStatus: trying to read from '\\SAMBA'
            10/02 10:50:20 NetpGetNt4RefusePasswordChangeStatus: RefusePasswordChange == 0
            10/02 10:50:20 NetpLsaOpenSecret: status: 0xc0000034
            10/02 10:50:21 NetpManageMachineAccountWithSid: NetUserAdd on '\\SAMBA' for 'GIM-127-13$' failed: 0x8b0
            10/02 10:50:21 NetpManageMachineAccountWithSid: status of attempting to set password on '\\SAMBA' for 'GIM-127-13$': 0x0
            10/02 10:50:21 NetpJoinDomain: status of creating account: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:21 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:21 NetpSetLsaPrimaryDomain: for 'SAMBA_DOMAIN' status: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:21 NetpJoinDomain: status of setting LSA pri. domain: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:21 NetpJoinDomain: status of managing local groups: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:21 NetpJoinDomain: status of setting netlogon cache: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:22 NetpJoinDomain: status of clearing ComputerNamePhysicalDnsDomain: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:22 NetpUpdateW32timeConfig: 0x0
            10/02 10:50:22 NetpJoinDomain: status of disconnecting from '\\SAMBA': 0x0
            10/02 10:50:22 NetpDoDomainJoin: status: 0x0
            10/02 10:53:12 -----------------------------------------------------------------
            10/02 10:53:12 NetpDoDomainJoin
            10/02 10:53:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: 'gim-127-13'
            10/02 10:53:12 NetpGetLsaPrimaryDomain: status: 0x0
            10/02 10:53:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: the specified machine is already joined to 'SAMBA_DOMAIN'!
            10/02 10:53:12 NetpMachineValidToJoin: status: 0xa83
            10/02 10:53:12 NetpDoDomainJoin: status: 0xa83
            

            May be it could help to find the problem

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Sebastian Roth Moderator
              last edited by

              Well that’s an interesting catch. The difference I see is that the output from the old client says MachineAccountOU: (NULL) whereas the output from the new client seams to be empty but not NULL. Later on it fails with NetpJoinDomain: OU is specified but couldn’t get NT5 DC
              @Jbob Can you think of why this is different? You know the client source code a lot better than I do! Maybe OU is send as empty string (“”) instead of NULL in the new client.

              Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

              Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                plegrand
                last edited by

                On the client windows xp i try this command nltest.exe :

                nltest.exe /dsgetdc:samba_domain
                DC: \SAMBA
                Address: \SAMBA
                Dom Name: SAMBA_DOMAIN
                The command completed successfully

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  plegrand @Sebastian Roth
                  last edited by

                  @Uncle-Frank Just for test i put “NULL” then “(NULL)” into “Organizational Unit” in AD configuration without success

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
                    last edited by

                    Bug confirmed and isolated. Ticket has been made here:

                    https://github.com/FOGProject/fog-client/issues/22

                    Basic explanation:
                    For some reason the samba LDAP domain is returning an error code of 1355 instead of 2 or 50 (which correspond to OU errors). On OU errors the client will try using a null OU. I just have to add 1355 to the cases of OU errors.

                    Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                    P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • P
                      plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                      last edited by

                      @Jbob Hello, does it means that the new client will works now or do i have to wait the new “patched” client ?
                      Any way thanks for your help

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
                        last edited by

                        @plegrand The patch will be applied next release.

                        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P
                          plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                          last edited by

                          @Jbob Just for information , as i don’t know if the client have the patch which permit to join samba domain, i made a test today without success.
                          Same problem. But may be I’ve to wait a little.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
                            last edited by

                            The patch will only be applied on the next official release 0.9.6 or 0.10.0

                            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • P
                              plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                              last edited by

                              @Jbob thanks for your answer, for the moment i use the 4103 .
                              Thanks again

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P
                                plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                                last edited by

                                @Jbob is there a date for this new release ?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J
                                  Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
                                  last edited by

                                  @plegrand

                                  No release date is planned. For now keep using the legacy client. The next release of the client will be v0.10.0 which will include OSX + Linux compatibility.

                                  Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                                  Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • Wayne WorkmanW
                                    Wayne Workman @Joe Schmitt
                                    last edited by

                                    @Jbob said:

                                    @plegrand

                                    No release date is planned. For now keep using the legacy client. The next release of the client will be v0.10.0 which will include OSX + Linux compatibility.

                                    That’s what I’m waiting for!

                                    That is gonna blow minds left and right.

                                    Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
                                    Daily Clean Installation Results:
                                    https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
                                    FOG Reporting:
                                    https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • J
                                      Joe Schmitt Senior Developer
                                      last edited by Joe Schmitt

                                      @plegrand v0.9.6 is released, and this includes the Samba fix. (https://news.fogproject.org/client-v0-9-6/)

                                      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                                      P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • P
                                        plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                                        last edited by

                                        @Jbob Wonderful !!!
                                        I was waiting for this !!
                                        I’m going to test today and i’ll tell you the result
                                        thanks again !!!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P
                                          plegrand @Joe Schmitt
                                          last edited by

                                          @Jbob Hello
                                          In first sorry for this long delay
                                          I just made the test today with the latest client. Everything seems to work fine !!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • 6
                                          • 5 / 6
                                          • First post
                                            Last post

                                          240

                                          Online

                                          12.0k

                                          Users

                                          17.3k

                                          Topics

                                          155.2k

                                          Posts
                                          Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project