3199 should fix this issue.

It should (hopefully) fix the weirdness that was ubuntu/debian and get new client stuff.

I am building it on a Windows 7 box. I also tried registering a different machine that has not been touched yet and I got the same error.

[quote=“Uncle Frank, post: 43424, member: 28116”]Try adding it to the ‘Parameters’ field in your fog.Deft entry…[/quote]

please can you help me with my project FOG
and thanks

Give ipxe.efi a try but I have a feeling that it will fail!! You better try to change the BIOS settings to legacy mode and use undionly.kpxe (see in the WorkingDevices list…)

3189 should address the mobile user logging in as well as remove the warnings about the headers sent and the random display of 1 or 0 on the mobile login page.

Thanks Tom, something strange is happening while i’m updating , it get hang on “… Downloading New FOG Client file…”
more than half an hour now.
this has never happened to me before.

Thanks again for assistance, the initimage works flawless now and i’m stoked to start trying to build my own tools into it.

I ran into another problem with 0x0000007b and fixed the IDE-Drivers used in my virtualbox-installation to the generic ones.

The inotify_add_watch error cleared itself mostly, no such errors during upload, 1 error during download but the deployed image boots without problems.

So thanks again, i’ll start using this software on a larger scale and i hope i can be of assistance in the future.

Don’t know if anyone ever ran into this before. But I guess it wouldn’t hurt if we check this first. Here is a yet untested piece of shell script which might do it…
[CODE]Index: lib/common/functions.sh

— lib/common/functions.sh(Revision 3187)
+++ lib/common/functions.sh(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -226,6 +226,22 @@
osid=“”;
;;
esac
+CWD=$(pwd)
+if [[ $CWD == “${webdirdest}” ]]
+then
+echo “Seems like you are trying to run …”
+exit 1;
+fi
+if [[ $CWD == “${storage}” ]]
+then
+echo “Seems like you are trying to run …”
+exit 1;
+fi
+if [[ $CWD == “${tftpdirdst}” ]]
+then
+echo “Seems like you are trying to run …”
+exit 1;
+fi
}

configureSnapins()[/CODE]

Edit: Not sure what happens to the indenting here. It’s all there when I paste but disapears when saving the message…

UPDATE: After I clicked Post it dawned on me that Symantec endpoint protection could be blocking the service. I uninstalled and now it seems to be working correctly. SEP12 didn’t like it I guess. If I find anything else, I’ll post.

Thanks guys I knew it was something simple but I had been staring at it too long:)
GP

The server is running just fine now. It has imaged a few computers, but it was still never able to be seen by that laptop, so I just built an image from scratch for it so that I could get it to the teacher that needed it. At this point I think there is something wrong with the switch in this room (rather old 3com switch). I am getting the superintendent to buy new switches, but one thing at a time (because of the price tag).

[quote=“Eze84d, post: 44616, member: 28734”]Tom Elliott thank you very much for your help.

Of course I’m using translate.google.com to translate what I mean to, so maybe there are some inconsistencies in language.

My original language is Spanish, I’m from Argentina, and to be honest, in English, very little to no …

Thanks again for your support !!![/quote]

i highly recommend that you post the original text as well as the translation.
the automatic translation is far from perfect, and some people on the forum will be able to understand your message in your native language.

Here is exactly what we used to test the connections:
root@fogVM:/images/DellOptiplex3020syspreptest# udp-sender --file /opt/fog/log/multicast.log --ttl 32 --mcast-data-address 239.168.1.1 --min-receivers 2
Udp-sender 20120424
Using full duplex mode
UDP sender for /opt/fog/log/multicast.log at 172.28.2.21 on eth0
Broadcasting control to 224.0.0.1
New connection from 172.28.16.36 (#0) 00000009
Ready. Press any key to start sending data.
New connection from 172.28.16.49 (#1) 00000009
Ready. Press any key to start sending data.
Starting transfer: 00000009
bytes= 2 200 re-xmits=0000001 ( 50.0%) slice=0112 - 0
Transfer complete.
Disconnecting #0 (172.28.16.36)
Disconnecting #1 (172.28.16.49)

Here is the one for the image:
root@fogVM:/images/DellOptiplex3020syspreptest# gunzip -c “/images/DellOptiplex3020syspreptest/d1p1.img” | /usr/local/sbin/udp-sender --min-receivers 2 --mcast-data-address 239.168.1.1 --portbase 9000 --interface 172.28.2.21 --full-duplex --ttl 32
Udp-sender 20120424
UDP sender for (stdin) at 172.28.2.21 on eth0
Broadcasting control to 224.0.0.1
New connection from 172.28.16.36 (#0) 00000009
Ready. Press any key to start sending data.
New connection from 172.28.16.49 (#1) 00000009
Ready. Press any key to start sending data.
Starting transfer: 00000009
Timeout notAnswered=[0,1] notReady=[0,1] nrAns=0 nrRead=0 nrPart=2 avg=6696
Timeout notAnswered=[0,1] notReady=[0,1] nrAns=0 nrRead=0 nrPart=2 avg=6696
Timeout notAnswered=[0,1] notReady=[0,1] nrAns=0 nrRead=0 nrPart=2 avg=6696
Timeout notAnswered=[0,1] notReady=[0,1] nrAns=0 nrRead=0 nrPart=2 avg=6696

It’s always wanted to grab all the MAC Addresses. That’s exactly what its purpose is.

First things first, what version of FOG?

Second, what OS are you running on?

Third, is the drive really only 1.5GB? <-- You’ll be lucky if you can fit one image on it.

Thanks!

The wol function still doesn’t works with the SVN 3178 with proxy enable.
My server works well now, whithout the proxy filed.
In which cases I’ll need to filed the proxy filed ?

Last question, I don’t understand your sentence :“but don’t have a viable way to test it myself.”
I my case I just have to put an IP adress in the field “[SIZE=13px][FONT=Ubuntu][COLOR=#555555]FOG_PROXY_IP”[COLOR=#000000] and the WOL function don’t work anymore on all computers on the same subnet of my server. I asume that you can try it on evry installation ? Or it’s just in my case ??[/COLOR][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]

It’s not a router.

It’s a router, switch, DHCP, DNS, Access point Combination device…

and real world organizations with over 10 clients don’t use such limited consumer grade devices within their core network infrastructure. They would use an enterprise level solution (like Cisco Small Business devices, or server 2008, 2012.) that allows configuring 066 and 067.

What I recommend for you is not necessarily what I’d recommend for others.

Matthew,

thank you for this idea. I already switched to a more reliable solution. I might try Fog in the future again with firewall turned off.

Got it working?? I just found this (again) where someone had if working already months ago: [url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/fog-pxe-boot-with-usb-to-ethernet-adapter.10352/page-3#post-40799[/url]