@kratkale So, just to make sure:

Things are working (though you are getting a visual error saying something failed when it really didn’t?)

Otherwise things are functioning mostly correctly now, right?

@kratkale

I’m using a simulation but I’m still seeing percent for mutlicast tasks.

@kratkale If you update the the latest verison of working-1.6, does this error go away?

@kratkale Did changing the serial on the host in question get it imaging to the right drive?

@kratkale the last 0 is an O (ohhhhh) not a 0 (zero)

@Jab98 This is one baseline feature of the location plugin.

@kratkale The error I’ll have to look as it might come from the UI side but also ties in with how things occur on the FOS side (different repo.)

The task completed and marked the db, but apparently seems to be doing so in one swoop.

As for why it’s not seeing the same serial, that I don’t know how you’re getting the serial/size of the disks? that’s the same for that specific machine saying that serial doesn’t exist?

I mean the same serial should not exist for different machines. (Plain and simple)

You can boot the issue machine into debug mode (cancel the existing tasking, then redo the same tasking but check the “Debug” checkbox before you submit it.

Then run that same lsblk -pdno SERIAL,SIZE after pressing enter and getting dropped into the console to type commands.

My guess is the serial for that machine is NOT BNE7n774610407R40, otherwise there’d be huge issues in shipping equipment and inventory management.

@kratkale It’s likely looking at UTC time?

@kratkale The issue isn’t domain join but rather that machine (or those machines?) security tokens no longer match the security token they were initially given, most likely because the machine you cloned had a security token it passed in?

From the host(s) in question in the uI you can reset the security token:

I believe it’s similar for groups (if you wanted to put the 5 having issues into the same group and click reset encryption data.)

@kratkale that would make sense if the ids don’t match the actual user, apologies on not having you check this part sooner, and I never thought to check the directory permissions, so thank you for that.

@kratkale In fact, I believe it’s using ftp from the client -> fog server to download the file because the client is coded separately and I don’t know any C# unfortunately.

Can you try simple FTP -> FOG SErver, with the same username/password pair?

@kratkale It’s possible but I doubt it.

@kratkale Did updating the password on the global settings piece fix things? We know the storage node seems to be working (theoretically)

interesting.

Let me see, that message is old as technically it’s sftp or should be.

@kratkale Can you take a look that the file exists on the fog server in /opt/fog/snapins/000_SCHUELER_202604211353.bat and is containing the expected data for that batch script?

Please also take a look at the snapins table:

sudo mysql -u root fog

SELECT sHash from snapins WHERE sFilePath='000_SCHUELER_202604211353.bat'

the sHash from this should equal the same for:

sha512sum /opt/fog/snapins/000_SCHUELER_202604211353.bat

If these are matching, then the issue is somewhere in transit and will want to figure out why.

I believe these files get stored and not deleted, but I could be wrong:
You can see the file location C:\Program Files (x86)\FOG\tmp\000_SCHUELER_202604211353.bat

If you can open the file with notepad++ or soemthing and confirm whether it download the correct file andthe contents look correct?

@JCS-RVK Understood and apologies there’s not a good method around this.

Thanks for at least understanding. I wonder if some of the similar types of issues we’ve seen historically have a similar style of problem that I’m only coming to realize now-a-days.

@JCS-RVK I’m assuming by 4k you mean a “native 4k” drive? Meaning, that it cannot except 512e sectors (break out a 4k block by allowing 512 byte emulation)?

Basically if the drive you’re working on is 4Kn you MUST capture an image from a 4k based machine and deploy. It bites, yes, but there’s no real way to group 8 512 sectors into a single 4k sector without data loss/corruption in some way shape or form.

@kratkale So I see this as being an issue with certain extensions.

I happen to have the bitwarden extension and when I initially load this loader bar occurs and after about 2-3 minutes it finally catches up and cleans up. This loading is not because of “FOG” persay, but rather an extension reading ajax information which then fails to find or load anything on the page but the “load processor - the working circle you see” thinks something else is happening.

@kratkale Do you happen to use bitwarden?

@kratkale I just tested installing and hadn’t had any issues, so I’m thinking maybe the fogserver line didn’t get updated to point at the proper IP?