• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. ITCC
    3. Posts
    I
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 1
    • Topics 44
    • Posts 206
    • Groups 0

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • SVN 37-unknown

      i’ve been getting my SVN from the blow and it no longer works:
      https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freeghost/code/trunk

      I have now downloaded from below but there is no version detail within FOG
      https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject

      What a i doing wrong, where is the latest and greatest?

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: Protected Images & Hosts / Groups

      don’t get me wrong. we know how to script installs / use GPO.
      just some items are just not worth the work at the moment.

      posted in Feature Request
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: Protected Images & Hosts / Groups

      only items like Sage or bspoke applications we use.

      posted in Feature Request
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: Protected Images & Hosts / Groups

      It would be nice to protect the upload host against changes. so if someone creates a group they don’t alter these machines.

      Another protection idea (maybe for FOG 2.0) when you deploy to some machines it would be nice if you could some how verify a high profile machine. So if it needs extra work or you have to remember to bake some config from it 1st then you have to acknowledge you know this is required. Currently we set these machines to not boot from PXE so we have to do it manual, forcing you to think about it.

      posted in Feature Request
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: SVN 3689 from 3683

      just did clean install and issue remains. Invalid Login

      can anyone else on 3689 confirm?

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • SVN 3689 from 3683

      Just a note and i will check now but i just did the upgrade to check as per my other issue (hosts not shown in fog) and now the login username and password (still default) don’t work.

      I checked and no schema changes for the DB where requested. Like i say, i’ll do a fresh install of 3689 but as an upgrade it seemed to go wrong…

      posted in Bug Reports 3689 login upgrade
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: Would like to (co-)write/develop a "decent" tutorial.

      I’m with you on this manual stuff.
      Although I think it could be easier by only putting a few versions. Like LTS verisons

      Anyway i have already built a 1.3 manual for CentOS7x64 only but is easy to follow for beginners. I have a wiki mod account and will import on lease. Currently i am upgrading my version and making sure it’s 100% and has any new mods since i 1st wrote it.

      /images at 1st install is a new option that i have made a note of but not cleaned up yet.

      Please find @ http://blog.ibuddy.info/index.php/2015/06/fog-v-1-3-on-centos-7-full-install-guide/

      I think one for Ubuntu LTS (latest) and maybe another should be enough? no??

      I’m also going to make a xenserver and vmware VM for 1.3 So anyone want to do a hyper-v or vbox ?
      If so we could all setup the same so it’s the same for whatever you need. documents can then be std.

      posted in Tutorials
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: Developers request any testing ?

      timescale?

      posted in General
      I
      ITCC
    • Developers request any testing ?

      anything you want testing?

      posted in General
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: SVN 3683 (MAJOR BUG)

      OK, so i was right to report. It’s nice to know you when you make a difference. just saying fixed feels more like a i wasted your/my time on reporting.

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: SVN 3683 (MAJOR BUG)

      correct.

      I’m a little lost. I download my SVN from https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freeghost/code/trunk

      i thought this was the latest and greatest. At the time of testing i downloaded the latest i could (thought) and thats the version i reported in to give you the best report on the latest version. It there is another link that provides an even newer version, please let me know. Don’t want to raise bugs if already addressed. Or due to this post is it now fixed in 3685 ?

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • Protected Images & Hosts / Groups

      Nice to see protection on the images. Could we see it on the hosts/groups as well?

      posted in Feature Request protection 1.3 protected
      I
      ITCC
    • SVN 3683 (MAJOR BUG)

      OS = CentOS 7 x64
      State = Full clean install test
      FOG V 3683

      Adding a HOST manually seems to work says added but view all or search will not find host. Try adding again and it says it exists so I guess it in the DB (not got time to check)

      I was trying to test FOG mobile view. Oh… it’s listed in here so yes to DB.

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: SVN 3587 - Failed to restore image

      I have upgraded fog to the latest SVN (3596)
      Not that this made an diff but an update.

      I uploaded a basic build we have instead of the Dell OS and it deployed in 2mins !!! i’m sure this is faster than .32 (current live)

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: SVN 3587 - Failed to restore image

      I agree. I’ll opt out of this i think. would be nice if you could just add to the “Host Kernel Arguments” or something.

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: SVN 3587 - Failed to restore image

      how do i use option -C (for testing…)

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: SVN 3587 - Failed to restore image

      Yes, image is the Dell base OS as this was just a test. Live images are manually created so this shouldn’t be an issue.

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: SVN 3587 - Failed to restore image

      the GUI error only shows for a second so missed the 1st time !

      IMAG0127.jpg IMAG0126.jpg

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • SVN 3587 - Failed to restore image

      FOG = 3587
      uploaded an image from Latitude 3550 worked fine.
      Windows7(5)
      Single Disk - Resizable
      Everything
      Protected = N (what is this one?)
      Compression = 6

      On trying to deploy to another laptop (same model/purchase date(so firmware)) i get “failed to restore image”.
      not sure if bug of config issue. (added to bug as not live ver)

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • RE: SVN 3586 - PXE NoMenu

      i was just testing the iPXE menu at this time.

      Location 1 = FOG Configuration -> iPXE Boot Menu ->
      Location 2 = FOG Configuration -> Fog Settings -> FOG Boot Settings ->

      Yes i have played with them all.

      posted in Bug Reports
      I
      ITCC
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
    • 10
    • 11
    • 8 / 11