Wrong Network Interface

[imagingmaster21]

@wayne-workman
https://dl2.pushbulletusercontent.com/J08p9FQbsYLXGwN5l8vqu3Z98q9LnLhP/image.png
Is the status.

[Wayne Workman]

@imagingmaster21 Read through this: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/11870/failed-to-get-an-ip-via-dhcp-only-on-a-certain-switch

[imagingmaster21]

@wayne-workman This worked before we upgraded from 1.4.4 to 1.5.0. We haven’t changed anything on the switch and all the settings are correct on the switch I verified those before.

[imagingmaster21]

@wayne-workman
The switch is… Pvst+ It’s basically a unique spanning-tree per vlan, but its running standard spanning-tree over them (not rapid)

[imagingmaster21]

@wayne-workman
I just tried this on a switch that another FOG Server running the same version worked on. The FOG Server that I am having issues on still does not work on the known good switch. So it is not the switch.

Any idea on what the culprit could be in DHCP?

[imagingmaster21]

@Wayne-Workman @Sebastian-Roth
I was looking at this here:
https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/7256/no-dhcp-response-when-trying-to-inventory-a-host-fog-trunk

I seen about trying a standard switch to see if it worked. So I grabbed a 5 port switch and still did not work. Here are some more screenshots:

• https://dl2.pushbulletusercontent.com/TjpLuWB0KKYGzdG41NsrvEeg1JoKErgy/20180517_133337.jpg
  -https://dl2.pushbulletusercontent.com/t1T9aZUgVR6dnnp23c74YsfDMYaoH9zk/20180517_133341.jpg
  https://dl2.pushbulletusercontent.com/zmul5sOnbxVi1AsknychwMCzYWxezeuQ/20180517_133343.jpg

I did use trunk to do the upgrade fro 1.4.4 to 1.5.0.

[Wayne Workman]

@imagingmaster21 Are you sure you have 1.5.0 installed? The latest stable is 1.5.2 and if you’re not using that, I would recommend you try it.

[imagingmaster21]

@wayne-workman
I am running 1.5.0-RC-9, would upgrading 1.5.2 fix this potentially?

[imagingmaster21]

@wayne-workman
Upgraded the version to 1.5.2 and capturing and pulling the image seems to be working correctly now. What would have cause this issue, just a bug in 1.5.0 that was fixed in 1.5.2?

[imagingmaster21]

@wayne-workman

Going from 1.5.0 to 1.5.2 resolved the issue.