Kernel for Ubuntu 64 bit

[Sebastian Roth]

@Tom said:

How easy it will be to export the images files and setting from my 0.31 machine?

I am sorry but 0.31 was long before I started looking into FOG. I hope @Tom-Elliott can give you some advice on ex/importing hosts, settings and images from 0.31 to trunk.

But I’d say before getting into this just setup a complete new test VM, install trunk, register three test hosts via the web interface by hand and see if you are still running into the kernel panic (e.g. try uploading an image)…

[Tom Elliott]

@Tom just trying to think I notice you’re chai loading through pxelinux.0 in your setup. What’s the fog settings for bzImage and init.xz? Can you set the bootfile parameter to look at undionly.kpxe or undionly.kkpxe?

[Tom]

@Tom-Elliott Tom, if you referring DHCP option 67 than the value is undionly.kpxe , I will try undionly.kkpxe and let you know.
Other than that I will need more clarification where to look.

Thanks,

Tom

[Tom Elliott]

@Tom the YouTube video you posted shows the file is going through pxelinux.0. Are you sure there is only one dhcp server handing out things?

[Tom]

@Tom-Elliott You are right, I checked the 3 domain controllers that hold DHCP, 2 had pxelinux.0 and the other had undionly.kpxe.
did not pay attention. (so sorry)
so, after correcting it, my client cannot boot from pxe at all. I tried undionly.kkpxe as well.
I get “selected boot device failed”.
I also updated to 6257.
Thanks,

Tom

[Sebastian Roth]

@Tom Looks like this: https://static.spiceworks.com/shared/post/0012/0090/image1.JPG

Either you are pointing it to the wrong TFTP server (check next-server/option 66) or your TFTP service on the FOG server is down (restart and test the service: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Troubleshoot_TFTP)

[Tom Elliott]

I’m confused what’s going on. You have three dhcp servers? All handing out Option 66/67?

Can all three DHCP servers actually reach the FOG Server? If so, maybe this is the issue? I think the old saying: “Too many chiefs, not enough indians” is potentially one of the truest statements in this scenario?

(PS, I’m not intending my statement to offend, just simply using an old idiom I’ve heard as far as when I was a kid.)

[Tom]

@Tom-Elliott Let me explain, I have 2 domain controllers in one subnet providing DHCP to workstations (70/30 rule). The 3rd is DHCP server on different subnet, which does not play any role in this scenario.
I build new VM from scratch, Ubuntu 14.04.3 and fog 6257.
From DCs I was able to ping fog successfully.
Options 66 set with ip address correctly
Option 67 set to undionly.kpxe. I tried kkpxe and pxe - I got “selected boot device failed”. When it was incorrectly set to prelinux.0 I got the kernel panic-not syncing error.
Installed tftp on my windows station, tried to do tfpt -I x.x.x.x get undioly.kpxe and received the following error:
Timeout occurred, connect request failed.
On the fog machine: Ran tftp -v x.x.x.x -c get undionly.kpxe and got:
Connected to x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x), port 69
getting from x.x.x.x:undionly.kpxe to undionly.kpxe [netascii]
Received 92617 bytes in 0.3 seconds [2762316 bit/s]
Then, ran service tftp-hpa status and received tftp-gpa:unrecognized service
Ran cat /etc/xinetd.d/tftp results looks correct.
Ran cat /etc/default/tftpd-hpa and got "cat: /etc/default/tftp-hpa: No such file or directory

I hope it will give you a better insight,

Thanks for all the help

Tom

[Wayne Workman]

@Tom said:

I have 2 domain controllers in one subnet providing DHCP to workstations (70/30 rule)

that rule will cause clients to sometimes not get an IP.

70/30 means 70% of your available range is given out by one server, 30% by the other.

However, the load is 50/50. Both DHCP servers hear all DHCP Discoveries, both attempt to hand out an address. Whichever one is first wins normally unless you have one set as authoritative (which nobody does it seems).

When the one that has 30% of the range assigned to it runs out of available addresses, it’ll respond to clients that no addresses are available and the client will then auto-configure with APIPA.

Anything other than 50/50 is almost always not a good idea - and is easy to mess up and break.

[MRCUR]

@Tom If you’re going to run multiple DHCP servers (I assume you’re trying to get some HA out of it), then you really should be using the built in DHCP Failover setup that Windows provides. It’s far easier to manage than what you’ve got now.

I’ll also note that you should really consider moving DHCP services off of a DC.

[Tom]

@Wayne-Workman as much as I agree with you, that decision was made above me. Also, I have never encountered any issue with this setup.
In terms od fog, I never had any issue while running 0.31.

[Wayne Workman]

@Tom Well I mean, if the lease time is short enough or if you have a large enough pool of addresses on the 30% range DHCP Server - or a mixture of those two things - then you might never have problems.

But I say what I say because the potential is there. It’s happened here where I work.

We have a DHCP server that serves 100% of a range, and we had an old mac server - we used it for OpenDirectory for our Macs and for Deploy studio. It was configured to run DHCP for a very small subset of our range, and at the very end of our range - and we always kept that turned off unless we were using Deploy Studio. Well one day it was turned on somehow accidentally (not by me) and because the range was so small (256), it ran out of IPs quickly, and then our entire building suddenly started not getting addresses and auto-configuring with APIPA. Keep in mind that thousands and thousands of addresses were still available from our actual DHCP server - and it was even responding to requests, it’s just that the old mac server was beating it and serving addresses faster… or in this case, serving “no more addresses available” messages faster.

[Wayne Workman]

@Tom said:

Installed tftp on my windows station, tried to do tfpt -I x.x.x.x get undioly.kpxe and received the following error:

try tftp –i x.x.x.x get undionly.kpxe

you have typos in your above command. tftpt and the -i should be lower case.

If it still doesn’t work, sounds like a network thing or firewall thing. Can you ping the fog server from this windows box? ssh into it?

[Tom]

@Wayne-Workman So, disabled the firewall on my win 10 machine. Ran tftp -i x.x.x.x get undionly.kpxe successfully.
I’m not sure why target machine cannot boot to pxe.

Thanks,

Tom

[Wayne Workman]

@Tom On all the DHCP servers, please set options 066 and 067. 66 should be the FOG server IP, 67 should (generally) be undionly.kkpxe

If you need help doing that - or have questions, please PM me so we can work much faster.

[george1421]

I think we are at the point where we are going to need to see a packet capture of what is really going down the wire with these dhcp servers. Your current setup is not standard, for sure. What we will need for you to do is setup wireshark (or other tool to collect a pcap file) on a mirrored port. Select the source of the mirror the port where the target computer you are trying to boot is connected. Set the filters on wireshark to “bootp || tftp”. Once you have wireshark collecting data boot the target computer until it fails then stop wireshark. Make the time between starting wireshark capture and booting the target computer as short as possible.

Post the pcap file here. There are several people in the forums that can decode it, even without a magic decoder ring. Also please note the ip address of the dhcp server(s)

[Wayne Workman]

A mirrored port is not necessary. You can do a capture directly on your FOG server like this: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php?title=TCPDump

Also, just to collect DHCP data, you don’t need to do anything but just run a capture in Wireshark on a computer that’s on the same network as the computer’s you’re trying to fog. DHCP Discoveries and replies are broadcast messages - they go throughout the entire broadcast domain.

[george1421]

@Wayne-Workman The mirrored port suggestion was to also capture the unicast tftp requests from the point of view what the target is specifically seeing.

[Tom]

@Wayne-Workman WOW, I don’t know what change, but it’s working now. I was able to register the OptiPlex 990 and the Latitude E7240.
Now I have to figure out the new interface, since it’s very different from 0.31.

THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR HELP, I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO DO IT WITHOUT YOU.

Tom

[Wayne Workman]

@Tom But does it work 5 times in a row…