SELinux Policy

[Wayne Workman]

Compiled for me.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2BmriqzYEgXeG81aHRreWtMTXc/view?usp=sharing

[Wayne Workman]

#wiki Hashtagging this for addition to the wiki.

[Wayne Workman]

I had to find my Makefile on Fedora 21 server. It’s funny because it just worked on Fedora 23 server, literally copy/paste.

find / | grep Makefile | grep -i selinux

/usr/share/selinux/devel/include/Makefile
/usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile    #  <--- that's the one.

make -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile fog.pp

Compiling targeted fog module
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  loading policy configuration from tmp/fog.tmp
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  policy configuration loaded
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  writing binary representation (version 17) to tmp/fog.mod
Creating targeted fog.pp policy package
rm tmp/fog.mod tmp/fog.mod.fc

semodule -i fog.pp

[Joe Schmitt]

@Wayne-Workman said:

/usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile

Updated main command to reflect this.

[george1421]

No luck compiling for me on Centos 6.7

[root@centtest SELinux]# make -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile fog.pp
Compiling targeted fog module
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  loading policy configuration from tmp/fog.tmp
fog.te":50:ERROR 'unknown class service used in rule' at token ';' on line 3260:
allow unconfined_t init_t:service enable;
#============= unconfined_t ==============
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [tmp/fog.mod] Error 1

[Joe Schmitt]

@george1421 Centos 6 appears to be missing some of the modules I require. I’ve been trying to hunt down the exact dependencies I’d need, or if need be, a new policy with different rules / modules.

[george1421]

@Jbob said:

@george1421 Centos 6 appears to be missing some of the modules I require. I’ve been trying to hunt down the exact dependencies I’d need, or if need be, a new policy with different rules / modules.

That’s why we are going through this. No worries on my part. We’ll get them worked out.

[Wayne Workman]

This installed fine on Fedora 23.

the SELinux stuff works fine on Fedora 23 Server so far.

I’ve tried this setup on a virtualized Fedora 23 FOG server. I’ve imaged 2 computers so far with this setup. One of them, I tried out WOL just to confirm that still works - it does.

[Wayne Workman]

Holding off on adding this to the WiKi - It is my hopes that enough people will try this out that it can be added to Trunk by the @Developers and implimented in FOG 1.3.0.

[Wayne Workman]

@Jbob As far as I can tell, in Fedora 23 Server Minimal, The SELinux module breaks the FOG_FTP_IMAGE_SIZE feature.

[Wayne Workman]

There’s also this issue. I’m just going to tag the link and description here.

* Restarting Apache2 for fog vhost............................Failed!

https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/6251/fedora-23-svn-4455-restarting-apache2-for-fog-vhost-failed

[Wayne Workman]

Another problem that needs addressed with the SELinux setup:
https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/6278/can-t-delete-images

[Wayne Workman]

@Jbob I really want to see SELinux incorporated into fog. I know it’s finals time, and many a aspiring young adult is quite busy making a future for themselves. That’s fine. I just don’t want this swept under the rug.

I’ve noticed that no changes have been made to the SELinux stuff.

[root@fog-server trunk]# cd SELinux
[root@fog-server SELinux]# ls
fog.fc  fog.if  fog.pp  fog.te  tmp
[root@fog-server SELinux]# make -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile fog.pp
make: 'fog.pp' is up to date.

That’s fine - but if anyone wants me to run some tests, I’m up for it.

[Wayne Workman]

Added a link to this thread here: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/FOG_security#Other_issues

[Wayne Workman]

@Developers Apologies for spamming this thread to death… but I’d like to see a fully functional SELinux policy for FOG 1.3.0 for at least the CentOS 7 platform. Has any progress been made with the below problems by anyone?

[Wayne Workman]

I’m learning about these:

yum install setroubleshoot setroubleshoot-server -y

Apparently those two packages will help you analyze and tune a SELinux policy for anything.

Another amazing resource (just watched the whole thing):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxjenQ31b70

I feel a lot better about Security Enhanced Linux now (SELinux), and I’ll definitely be creating my own modules for it. Luckily for me I’ve run a production fog server in Permissive mode for a HOT minute now, so all the information I would need to create a module is already there.

[Joe Schmitt]

@Wayne-Workman I’ll update the policy hopefully within the week.

[Wayne Workman]

Bumping this - it would be so nice to have SELinux enabled as a standard configuration.