FOG BIOS And EFI Coexistence
-
for windows server 2012 DHCP, it was as simple as the link Wayne Workman posted.
[url]http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-January/021404.html[/url] create vendor class that matches uefi systems ([I][COLOR=#000000]PXEClient:Arch:00007[/COLOR][/I]) and give those that match a different bootfile (in my case, ipxe.efi) -
I see… interesting. This may be the direction that things have to go. DnsMasq seems in sufficient for EFI PXE and some older PXE clients. I’m still going to try a few things with it, but otherwise we might just have to make good documentation on the changes to make to a Windows 2012+ DHCP and a Linux DHCP to achieve coexistence. I will work on the Windows 2012 DHCP configs eventually (assuming DnsMasq fails me), but I will need to spin up a new 2012 server and integrate it to our domain first.
-
This is the thread:
[url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/undionly-kpxe-and-ipxe-efi.12607/[/url]
-
Has anyone tried either of my configs I posted? Both of them properly serve legacy/efi bootfiles.
-
I will tonight. I had other things going on last night when you posted those.
-
I will see what I can do as well… light staffing here today so I’m a bit busy.
-
No worries, just wanted to make sure nobody overlooked them.
-
[quote=“d4rk3, post: 46768, member: 23583”]Give this a try under [B]tftp-root=/tftpboot[/B] (replace FOG with your FOG server’s hostname):
[CODE]dhcp-boot=undionly.kpxe,FOG,10.0.0.3
dhcp-match=set:efi-ia32,option:client-arch,6
dhcp-boot=tag:efi-ia32,ipxe.efi,FOG,10.0.0.3
dhcp-match=set:efi-x86_64,option:client-arch,7
dhcp-boot=tag:efi-x86_64,snp.efi,FOG,10.0.0.3
dhcp-range=10.0.0.3,proxy,255.255.255.0
[/CODE][/quote]I don’t know what parts you want me to take out, though…
-
Who’s already got this working?
-
[quote=“Wayne Workman, post: 47037, member: 28155”]I don’t know what parts you want me to take out, though…[/quote]
None. Just replace [B]FOG[/B] with your FOG server’s hostname and replace [B]10.0.0.3[/B] with your FOG server’s IP.
I goofed on the last line, it should read [I][FONT=Consolas]dhcp-range=[/FONT][/I][B][I][FONT=Consolas]10.0.0.0[/FONT][/I][/B][I][FONT=Consolas],proxy,255.255.255.0[/FONT][/I]
For that, replace [B]10.0.0.0[/B] with your network’s address.
And if you want to change any of the bootfiles to different ones have at it.
-
Well, 10.0.0.3 IS my home FOG server’s IP address. It’s a private address, not public, and it’s home so I don’t care about sharing here.
And my network’s address is 10.0.0.0 I set my house up like that for simplicity… it’s easier to type than that dumb 192.168.1 BS that most home DHCP is configured with.
-
The dhcp-range line, I recommend, being set to your fog server. It will automatically work on the network your fogserver is on. If you’re actually trying to use a range of IP’s for Proxy to hand out then you would have something like:
[code]dhcp-range=10.0.0.0,10.0.0.255,proxy,255.255.255.0[/code]However this is more than overkill. I think it highly unlikely you will be handing more than the network allowed (253 – e.g. gateway, network, broadcast) of your fog server’s possibilities.
If you know you’ll be hitting more than that at any time, just open the subnet to a higher range. Whatever the IP is set will be the same network the proxy hands out within.
-
[quote=“Junkhacker, post: 46793, member: 21583”]for windows server 2012 DHCP, it was as simple as the link Wayne Workman posted.
[url]http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-January/021404.html[/url] create vendor class that matches uefi systems ([I][COLOR=#000000]PXEClient:Arch:00007[/COLOR][/I]) and give those that match a different bootfile (in my case, ipxe.efi)[/quote]Did you got this up and running?
I created the Vendor Class, created the policy, downloaded ipxe.efi and updated the DHCP server settings in 2012R2Legacy Boot + undionly.kpxe ~ working
UEFI boot + ipxe.efi ~ [B]not working[/B][B]edit:[/B] typo ([I]ipxe.kpxe[/I] should have been[I] ipxe.efi[/I])
-
[quote=“Jeroen Brussich, post: 47054, member: 23215”]Did you got this up and running?
I created the Vendor Class, created the policy, downloaded ipxe.efi and updated the DHCP server settings in 2012R2Legacy Boot + undionly.kpxe ~ working
UEFI boot + ipxe.kpxe ~ [B]not working[/B][/quote]ipxe network boot is working for me. i set my uefi boot to ipxe.efi
uefi imaging isn’t working perfectly for me, but that has nothing to do with the network
i can schedule tasks, access the boot menu (without graphics), and load the fog kernel -
I did configure both bootfiles on the same tftpserver.
Maybe that’s what I did wrong?This is what i see on my boot screen:
[CODE]tftp://MY.IP/default.ipxe… ok
http://MY.IP/fog/service/ipxe/boot.php… ok
http://MY.IP/fog/service/ipxe/bg.png… okCould not use picture: Exec format error (htt://ipxe.org/2e008081)
Could not boot: Exec format error (htt://ipxe.org/2e008081)
Could not boot: Exec format error (htt://ipxe.org/2e008081)Failed to get IP, Booting back to bios
[/CODE]I downloaded ipxe.efi from [url]https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freeghost/code/trunk/packages/tftp/[/url]
[B]edit:[/B] even if I don’t use the policy and make ipxe.efi the default BootFile Name of that scope, I get the same error. Maybe my ipxe.efi file is corrupt?
-
[quote=“Jeroen Brussich, post: 47057, member: 23215”]I did configure both bootfiles on the same tftpserver.
Maybe that’s what I did wrong?This is what i see on my boot screen:
[CODE]tftp://MY.IP/default.ipxe… ok
http://MY.IP/fog/service/ipxe/boot.php… ok
http://MY.IP/fog/service/ipxe/bg.png… okCould not use picture: Exec format error (htt://ipxe.org/2e008081)
Could not boot: Exec format error (htt://ipxe.org/2e008081)
Could not boot: Exec format error (htt://ipxe.org/2e008081)Failed to get IP, Booting back to bios
[/CODE]I downloaded ipxe.efi from [url]https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freeghost/code/trunk/packages/tftp/[/url]
[B]edit:[/B] even if I don’t use the policy and make ipxe.efi the default BootFile Name of that scope, I get the same error. Maybe my ipxe.efi file is corrupt?[/quote]
It’s definitely working because the bootfile instructed your client to download default.ipxe and so on.
That being said, the problem now is with the bg.png picture. Maybe Tom will chime in with a fix for the bg.png…
-
There’s another guy that had this issue… he said he just commented out the code for the picture…
But then he ran into a ton of other issues too. He had built his own ROM for his NIC.
-
I can comment out the picturecode allright (if I would know in what file to comment
)But I don’t think I’m smart enough to build my own ROM for that NIC.
Especially since I have at least 5 different computertypes in my network and I would have to build one ROM to rule them all…That being said, do we really need uefi (now)?
I can install 8.1 with legacy boot enabled, right?Or am I missing the big picture again?
-
Newer computers are slowly ceasing even supporting BIOS.
-
Also UEFI can boot much faster, and has smarter support of the firmware interface.
