Categories

  • Get help with your FOG system.
    FOG Problems Hardware Compatibility Windows Problems Linux Problems Mac Problems General Problems
    13k Topics
    115k Posts
    V

    @Tom-Elliott When searching for a solution I recall seeing a related post on GitHub but that was not me. Today I created a new VM that was 70GB with 2GB EFI partition and after sysprep and it yielded the similar resize error during capture.

    I then tried Windows 11 25H2 June 2026 Build 26200.8655 with 60GB VM and it generated the resize error. 25H2 with 60GB VM and 2GB EFI also generated the resize error after sysprep during capture.

    The AI suggested defrag C : /X

    I ran the defrag before sysprep and capture was succesful.

    The pre optimization total fragmentation was 22% and post defragmentation it was also 22%

    To my understanding the /X flag consolidates free space. How was this the solution to my issue?

    Per the FOG Project wiki I found that defrag is recommended before sysprep:

    "…
    Before Running Sysprep
    Other steps to consider are:

    Run Chkdsk /f /p prior to imaging
    Defrag the drive
    Make sure 2gb of disk space is free or the NTFSresize will fail
    Make sure the FOG service is installed and properly configured
    Update your hostnamechange.dll file
    …
    "
    https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Client_Setup

  • Get the latest news on what's happening.
    Security Advisories
    184 Topics
    825 Posts
    A

    @Tom-Elliott I really appreciate that you are putting effort into providing more frequent releases, which makes it easier for everyone to deploy new security fixes in time. Keep up the good work!

  • View tutorials or talk about FOG in general.
    General Tutorials
    2k Topics
    19k Posts
    V

    Hello everyone,

    I am facing an issue with image capturing after performing an upgrade on my FOG server from 1.5.10 to 1.5.10.1886. Before the update, everything worked fine for me. The images were stored directly on the Synology NAS.

    My Setup:

    FOG Server: IP 192.168.10.220 (Debian 13) Storage: External Synology NAS with multiple virtual IPs (192.168.109.220 and 192.168.110.220). Storage Configuration: The Synology NAS is configured in FOG web UI as the Master Node for its storage group. The local Default storage node is NOT the master. Clients: Multiple clients on different subnets (e.g., 192.168.109.23 and 192.168.110.23).

    The Problem:
    The Partclone phase finishes successfully on the client machine. The image files are correctly uploaded via NFS directly to the Synology NAS into the /images/dev/[MAC_ADDRESS] folder.

    However, right after Partclone reaches 100%, the task gets stuck in the FOG Web UI (at around 70%), and the client screen shows the following PHP FTP error:

    Error returned: Type: 2, File: /var/www/html/fog/lib/fog/fogftp.class.php, Line: 709, Message: ftp_put(/images/dev/[MAC]): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory, Host: 192.168.110.220, Username: foguser

    What I have verified:

    I tested the FTP connection manually via CMD/PowerShell from a PC using the same foguser credentials. I am able to log in, mkdir, rename, and rmdir inside the /images and /images/dev directories on the NAS without any permission errors. If I move and rename the MAC folder manually inside Synology File Station from /images/dev/[MAC] to /images/[Image_Name], the image works fine. This setup worked flawlessly before the FOG server upgrade. The /images directory is NOT mounted locally on the FOG server itself (and never had to be). Verified FTP username and password on NAS and FOG. It's same.

    It seems that fogftp.class.php is incorrectly triggering ftp_put (trying to read a local file from the FOG server) instead of doing a remote ftp_rename directly on the NAS storage node.

    Has anyone encountered this bug after a recent upgrade, or is there a specific setting in the new version that I missed?

    Thank you for any help.

    Storage Node for NAS
    Storage Node for NAS.png

    Error on PC
    U10-PC13.jpg

  • Report bugs, request features, or get the latest progress.
    General Feature Request Bug Reports
    2k Topics
    21k Posts
    K

    @Valer Hi Valer,

    You can see my tutorial on using Secure boot with Shim, and my thoughts on what 2.0 means for Secure Boot with FOG here: http://forums.fogproject.org/post/158170

78

Online

12.7k

Users

17.6k

Topics

156.7k

Posts