Categories

  • 12k Topics
    114k Posts
    JJ FullmerJ

    @kratkale Full disclosure I haven’t read your whole post, but I have Z2 xx G1i’s
    Disable intel VMD and it should work.
    VMD was supported in intel 12th-14th gen chips for sure in our fos linux kernel, but something changed on the core ultra x line. It does exist in the linux kernel, and we have VMD enabled in the linux kernel, but there’s some other piece missing that I hope to find one day.
    But the quick fix is to disable VMD and the drive will be seen and all will be well.

  • Get the latest news on what's happening.
    184 Topics
    825 Posts
    A

    @Tom-Elliott I really appreciate that you are putting effort into providing more frequent releases, which makes it easier for everyone to deploy new security fixes in time. Keep up the good work!

  • View tutorials or talk about FOG in general.
    2k Topics
    19k Posts
    L

    Hello,

    We are preparing a lab with 44 MacBooks (Apple M4, 16 GB RAM).

    Currently, we have not implemented any imaging solution yet. At the moment, we only use our Samba Active Directory domain for user authentication (LDAP/Kerberos) on the Macs.

    All machines have the exact same hardware configuration, and we need a way to create a standardized macOS image and replicate it across all devices. This deployment process is performed once every semester, so we are looking for a reliable and repeatable solution.

    We are evaluating the FOG Project as a possible solution, but we are unsure whether it supports cloning and deploying macOS images on Apple Silicon devices (M4).

    We would like to ask:

    Is FOG suitable for capturing and deploying macOS images on Apple Silicon Macs?
    How does the cloning process for macOS work in this scenario?
    If FOG is not recommended, what tools or best practices would you suggest for mass macOS deployment and domain integration with Samba AD?

    Thank you for your guidance.

  • Report bugs, request features, or get the latest progress.
    2k Topics
    21k Posts
    Tom ElliottT

    @heix75 No.

    Not because it’s not a QOL improvement (it is) but because what you see in 1.5.x.x is NOT what is the end goal.

    If you want to see what the UX is moving toward install the version of FOG on working-1.6.

    You’ll understand (I hope), then, why I’m saying this.

94

Online

12.6k

Users

17.5k

Topics

156.4k

Posts