Categories

• Technical Help

  Get help with your FOG system.

  FOG Problems Hardware Compatibility Windows Problems Linux Problems Mac Problems General Problems
  13k Topics

  115k Posts

  F

  IMG_20260802_163510062_HDR.jpg

  Everything working fine until this latest FOG update. Using a Strix Point laptop with a USB Ethernet adaptor. Also trying to install different kernels through the web UI no longer works. HTTP ERROR 500

  I tried installing master branch. Failed, couldn’t even boot to memtest. I restored the FOG VM from a back up made a few days ago. 1.5.10.2144 - everything is working as normal now. Afraid to update

  Just thinking, sometime between the 1.5.10.2144 backup, there were tons of dev updates, and one time when I did a git pull on FOG, it deleted a bunch of things. But since the gui worked, I assumed it was okay

• Announcements

  Get the latest news on what's happening.

  Security Advisories
  184 Topics

  825 Posts

  A

  @Tom-Elliott I really appreciate that you are putting effort into providing more frequent releases, which makes it easier for everyone to deploy new security fixes in time. Keep up the good work!

• General Topics

  View tutorials or talk about FOG in general.

  General Tutorials
  2k Topics

  19k Posts

  8

  @Cpasjuste

  Thank you, I appreciate that. And yes, I did spend a lot of time on it.

  I agree that it bypasses the official installer in order to make use of Docker environment variables; however, at this stage, I don’t believe that FOG is going to change so dramatically that it’ll break it often.

  I will add that if this could get adopted as an official docker image, we could work with the FOG team to make sure nothing gets to pushed to the FOG code that would break the container until we can adjust the container as well.

• Developers

  Report bugs, request features, or get the latest progress.

  General Feature Request Bug Reports
  2k Topics

  21k Posts

  T

  @Lucas26 Thanks for letting us know and should be fixed in the latest.

  Also found a similar class of bug for FTP ports and we are porting the FTP side to dev-branch as we speak.

  Please let us know if this is working now?