Categories

  • 13k Topics
    115k Posts
    V

    @Tom-Elliott yes, I checked the services, they all running.
    systemctl status nfs-server
    ● nfs-server.service - NFS server and services
    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs-server.service; enabled; preset: enabled)
    Drop-In: /run/systemd/generator/nfs-server.service.d
    └─order-with-mounts.conf
    Active: active (exited) since Tue 2026-06-30 09:06:50 UTC; 17h ago
    Process: 4995 ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/exportfs -r (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
    Process: 4997 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
    Main PID: 4997 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
    CPU: 10ms

    Jun 30 09:06:49 fog-svr.local systemd[1]: Starting nfs-server.service - NFS server and services…
    Jun 30 09:06:50 fog-svr.local systemd[1]: Finished nfs-server.service - NFS server and services.

    rpcinfo -p 192.168.13.99
    192.168.13.99 mountd
    rpcinfo -t 192.168.13.99 nfs
    rpcin program vers proto port service
    100000 4 tcp 111 portmapper
    100000 3 tcp 111 portmapper
    100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
    100000 4 udp 111 portmapper
    100000 3 udp 111 portmapper
    100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
    100024 1 udp 50174 status
    100024 1 tcp 34667 status
    100005 1 tcp 20048 mountd
    100005 2 tcp 20048 mountd
    100005 3 tcp 20048 mountd
    100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs
    100227 3 tcp 2049 nfs_acl
    100021 1 udp 38178 nlockmgr
    100021 3 udp 38178 nlockmgr
    100021 4 udp 38178 nlockmgr
    100021 1 tcp 37227 nlockmgr
    100021 3 tcp 37227 nlockmgr
    100021 4 tcp 37227 nlockmgr

    I deployed the image using a VM on Proxmox and it worked, but with a phisical PC it gives the error like above. All are on the same VLAN.

  • Get the latest news on what's happening.
    184 Topics
    825 Posts
    A

    @Tom-Elliott I really appreciate that you are putting effort into providing more frequent releases, which makes it easier for everyone to deploy new security fixes in time. Keep up the good work!

  • View tutorials or talk about FOG in general.
    2k Topics
    19k Posts
    V

    Hello everyone,

    I am facing an issue with image capturing after performing an upgrade on my FOG server from 1.5.10 to 1.5.10.1886. Before the update, everything worked fine for me. The images were stored directly on the Synology NAS.

    My Setup:

    FOG Server: IP 192.168.10.220 (Debian 13) Storage: External Synology NAS with multiple virtual IPs (192.168.109.220 and 192.168.110.220). Storage Configuration: The Synology NAS is configured in FOG web UI as the Master Node for its storage group. The local Default storage node is NOT the master. Clients: Multiple clients on different subnets (e.g., 192.168.109.23 and 192.168.110.23).

    The Problem:
    The Partclone phase finishes successfully on the client machine. The image files are correctly uploaded via NFS directly to the Synology NAS into the /images/dev/[MAC_ADDRESS] folder.

    However, right after Partclone reaches 100%, the task gets stuck in the FOG Web UI (at around 70%), and the client screen shows the following PHP FTP error:

    Error returned: Type: 2, File: /var/www/html/fog/lib/fog/fogftp.class.php, Line: 709, Message: ftp_put(/images/dev/[MAC]): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory, Host: 192.168.110.220, Username: foguser

    What I have verified:

    I tested the FTP connection manually via CMD/PowerShell from a PC using the same foguser credentials. I am able to log in, mkdir, rename, and rmdir inside the /images and /images/dev directories on the NAS without any permission errors. If I move and rename the MAC folder manually inside Synology File Station from /images/dev/[MAC] to /images/[Image_Name], the image works fine. This setup worked flawlessly before the FOG server upgrade. The /images directory is NOT mounted locally on the FOG server itself (and never had to be). Verified FTP username and password on NAS and FOG. It's same.

    It seems that fogftp.class.php is incorrectly triggering ftp_put (trying to read a local file from the FOG server) instead of doing a remote ftp_rename directly on the NAS storage node.

    Has anyone encountered this bug after a recent upgrade, or is there a specific setting in the new version that I missed?

    Thank you for any help.

    Storage Node for NAS
    Storage Node for NAS.png

    Error on PC
    U10-PC13.jpg

  • Report bugs, request features, or get the latest progress.
    2k Topics
    21k Posts
    K

    @Valer Hi Valer,

    You can see my tutorial on using Secure boot with Shim, and my thoughts on what 2.0 means for Secure Boot with FOG here: http://forums.fogproject.org/post/158170

89

Online

12.7k

Users

17.6k

Topics

156.7k

Posts