Categories

  • 13k Topics
    115k Posts
    Tom ElliottT

    @Matthiman Your issue appears similar to an issue that’s being described here:
    https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/18213/version-1-6-0-beta-3187-ipxe-2-0-0-x-problems

    Though they seem to indicate changing to an older bootfile (snponly.efi/ipxe.efi whatever) worked so it’s not a kernel/init issue that’s happening causing this to occur.

    This may be what’s happening with everyone in this thread as well, but the first image that I see from Fog_Newb looks more like what I’d expect where there’s not enough ram available to load.

  • Get the latest news on what's happening.
    184 Topics
    825 Posts
    A

    @Tom-Elliott I really appreciate that you are putting effort into providing more frequent releases, which makes it easier for everyone to deploy new security fixes in time. Keep up the good work!

  • View tutorials or talk about FOG in general.
    2k Topics
    19k Posts
    8

    @Cpasjuste

    Thank you, I appreciate that. And yes, I did spend a lot of time on it.

    I agree that it bypasses the official installer in order to make use of Docker environment variables; however, at this stage, I don’t believe that FOG is going to change so dramatically that it’ll break it often.

    I will add that if this could get adopted as an official docker image, we could work with the FOG team to make sure nothing gets to pushed to the FOG code that would break the container until we can adjust the container as well.

  • Report bugs, request features, or get the latest progress.
    2k Topics
    21k Posts
    Tom ElliottT

    @sgennadi It already is possible 🙂 You just have to do the MOK or (use the new task type you see in working-1.6 to do all the work)

    Kernels are already signed automatically.

111

Online

12.7k

Users

17.6k

Topics

156.9k

Posts