Categories

  • 12k Topics
    114k Posts
    M

    @Tom-Elliott Regarding the snapin issue: you mentioned that I would not be able to deploy a snapin to a host unless that snapin is associated with the host.

    I may be misunderstanding how these settings work, so here is how I am interpreting them:

    For example, the 5002-PC01 is not associated with any snapin, yet I can still deploy a snapin to the group where this host belongs, and that host successfully applies the snapin.

    Screenshot 2026-03-10 095309.png

    For the group, however, I do not see those association checkboxes. This is a bit confusing because the snapin deployment anyways, is successful for most hosts in that group. Only a few fail.

    Screenshot 2026-03-10 095415.png

    The reason I have not associated the hosts with the snapin is that, in the past, whenever we deployed an image, those snapins would run automatically, even when we did not need them at that time.

    The log on the host with faild snapin deployment:

    ---------------------------------SnapinClient--------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10/03/2026 10.07.27 Client-Info Client Version: 0.13.0 10/03/2026 10.07.27 Client-Info Client OS: Windows 10/03/2026 10.07.27 Client-Info Server Version: 1.6.0-beta.2273 10/03/2026 10.07.27 Middleware::Response ERROR: Unable to get subsection 10/03/2026 10.07.27 Middleware::Response ERROR: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
  • Get the latest news on what's happening.
    184 Topics
    825 Posts
    A

    @Tom-Elliott I really appreciate that you are putting effort into providing more frequent releases, which makes it easier for everyone to deploy new security fixes in time. Keep up the good work!

  • View tutorials or talk about FOG in general.
    2k Topics
    19k Posts
    Cire3C

    @youzersef Ok, see how long it takes me to get back on a project…lol

    I did some more looking, and found yes, the GUI will re-write the dhcp config file. However I did some more reading and I guess services.inc determines what is written by the GUI.

    Sorry, not a CLI guy, and I love the quick and easy edits, viewing issues that the GUI provides. Like Fog ! However my servers are headless…lol

    Anyway, looking that route now, and will update if I find how Negate wants services edited so when it reboots, DHCP will remain.

    Determined 🙂

    Any thank you everyone here . This place has always been great for information !

  • Report bugs, request features, or get the latest progress.
    2k Topics
    21k Posts
    M

    Okay - So what killled this installation was the fact a 1.5.9 csv load was imported into my 1.5.10.1698 FOG - this killed a bunch of features and I eded up having to reinstall.

170

Online

12.6k

Users

17.5k

Topics

156.3k

Posts