• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. madeyem
    3. Posts
    M
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 9
    • Posts 116
    • Best 3
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by madeyem

    • RE: FOG and UEFI/M.2 SSD

      @matt-lowrey said in FOG and UEFI/M.2 SSD:

      No, the system doesn’t boot if I leave it on AHCI. It bluescreens with an “Inaccessible boot device” error.

      Follow these steps to make Windows boot in AHCI mode:

      https://support.thinkcritical.com/kb/articles/switch-windows-10-from-raid-ide-to-ahci

      Is it really necessary for you to have the PC run in raid on mode? If not, leave it at AHCI.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Snapin Help: Installing Sophos Without User Interaction Post Image

      @K-Hays said in Snapin Help: Installing Sophos Without User Interaction Post Image:

      @madeyem Specifically I only get one option in uninstall programs which is “Sophos Endpoint Agent”. I’m assuming that it has to do with the fact that our management is cloud based.

      Yes, that might be the reason, we use Standalone Endpoint, nothing cloud based.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Snapin Help: Installing Sophos Without User Interaction Post Image

      @K-Hays said in Snapin Help: Installing Sophos Without User Interaction Post Image:

      @madeyem I’m sorry if this is a dumb question but sophos is new to me/us, how do you go about uninstalling specific components in sophos. How do you do it manually?

      Assuming you have Windows: Control Panel -> Programs and Features

      alt text

      and there you uninstall everything except Sophos Auto Update.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Snapin Help: Installing Sophos Without User Interaction Post Image

      @K-Hays said in Snapin Help: Installing Sophos Without User Interaction Post Image:

      @madeyem I suppose my question is then, how would you uninstall the components separately? I could possibly do it with a batch file but is there a more simple way?

      I just uninstall the other components manually before I shutdown the PC to take the image. If you wait too long after uninstalling, Sophos will re-install again. I assume you could somehow do this via script.

      Another thing, we are running cloud based management. We don’t have a dedicated server. Would that affect this process at all?

      That I don’t know.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Snapin Help: Installing Sophos Without User Interaction Post Image

      Before you take the image:

      • install Sophos
      • configure the updating information (update server etc.)
      • uninstall everything except Sophos Auto Update

      After the deploy Sophos should now automatically install. At least that’s how I do it, no Snapins needed.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Upgrading from FOG 0.32 to 1.3.x

      @Wayne-Workman

      I have to take back, what I said earlier.
      When I first tried to migrate the database, I apparently did something wrong while exporting the db, because the size of the dump wasn’t nearly as big as it is now, when I tried it again. I now was able to successfully import the database and I have hosts, image definitions and users showing up properly in the web interface.

      The next step is to perform all of this on my actual FOG server, as this was only a test with a VM.

      Thanks for the help everyone!

      posted in General
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Upgrading from FOG 0.32 to 1.3.x

      @Wayne-Workman

      Ok, I will try and report back.

      posted in General
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Upgrading from FOG 0.32 to 1.3.x

      By this time, I’m pretty sure, that the problem lies in the different database structures in FOG 0.32 and 1.3.x. After I imported the hosts from 0.32, not only are they not listed on the web interface, but I also can’t add a host manually anymore, so the import from 0.32 apparently messes up the databases somehow. I installed phpmyadmin to check the databases after the import and the field hmHostID from hostMAC is completely empty. If you add a host manually (it works before the import), this is not the case and it shows up properly on the web interface.

      I guess, as long as someone doesn’t write something up, that particularly makes it possible to import from the old into the new database structure, we won’t be able to successfully import the hosts from 0.32.

      If someone comes up with a way, that is working, please share.

      posted in General
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Upgrading from FOG 0.32 to 1.3.x

      @Wayne-Workman

      The command

      DELETE FROM `hosts` WHERE `hostID` NOT IN (SELECT `hmHostID` FROM `hostMAC`);
      

      deleted all hosts I had imported, so I guess there is something wrong with the hostIDs? Any idea how I can fix this while importing hosts from 0.32?

      posted in General
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Upgrading from FOG 0.32 to 1.3.x

      I now have a VM with Ubuntu Server 16.04. and FOG 1.3.2 for testing.

      I exported the hosts from 0.32 (via MYSQL dump) and imported them into 1.3.2. If I go into the fog database from the command line, I can see, that the hosts are actually there (names, MACs, descriptions etc.), but in the FOG web interface no hosts are showing („0 results found“). Any ideas?

      posted in General
      M
      madeyem
    • Upgrading from FOG 0.32 to 1.3.x

      Hi everyone,

      I’m currently on

      • Ubuntu Server 10.04.
      • FOG 0.32

      and would like to upgrade to

      • Ubuntu Server 16.04.
      • FOG 1.3.0 or even 1.3.1
      • while keeping the hosts and images from 0.32

      I’m looking for best practice tips to do that. I do have a VM to test it all with. This VM is not my actual FOG server, so no worries here. I already read on the wiki that it is recommended to freshly install Ubuntu instead of upgrading. Has anyone successfully upgraded Ubuntu and FOG instead of a fresh installation?

      Would the following procedure work?

      1. Export hosts and images from FOG 0.32
      2. Uninstall/purge FOG 0.32
      3. Upgrade to Ubuntu 16.04
      4. Install FOG 1.3.x
      5. Import hosts and images from FOG 0.32

      Should I go with FOG 1.3.0 or directly to 1.3.1 RC?

      Any other tips?

      Thanks in advance.

      posted in General
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Anti Virus

      @Joe-Gill
      I currently update from an external source and have no experience yet how it affects the Sophos console.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Anti Virus

      We use Sophos AV, too, and before sysprepping and pulling the image I uninstall Sophos AV, but just the program itself, not the Auto-Update application, which is separate.

      After putting the image on another PC, Sophos AV is automatically installed via the Auto-Update, that was still on the image (including the update information, i.e. where to download it from). Has always worked for me this way.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Unable to Register Optiplex 780

      With older Optiplex models (745, 755, 760, 780), I’ve had the experience, that strangely some will work with FOG (in my case 0.32), others won’t (regardless of BIOS versions). In this case, I don’t think you should put too much attention on the error message, because as you said other models on the same network are working properly with FOG. I’ve never been able to solve this problem. In a few cases, alternative kernels helped me out, but most times I wouldn’t be able to make it work.
      The only work-around I know, is to put the HDD of the PC you want to image in another PC, that is working with FOG, and then after imaging (with shutdown afterwards) is done switch it back to the original PC.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: The future of FOG

      A quick question:
      Will there be no final 1.30 release? The last time I read about future goals, this seemed to be the next step.

      posted in General
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Dell 9020 FOG ISSUE!!

      FYI:
      I’m on FOG 0.32 (Kernel 3.8.8) and can image the Dell Optiplex 9020. I’ve tested the micro version (“lunch box” format) and small-form-factor.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: No Resizable Partitions Found

      This might help:

      [url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/win-7-image-upload-no-partitions-found.1130/#post-5714[/url]

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Wiki login

      [url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/requests-for-wiki-access-ask-here.3811/[/url]

      posted in General
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: How's your uptime?

      370 days, FOG 0.32.

      posted in General
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR fails on undionly.kpxe and undionly.kkpxe

      Just so you know, the HP EliteDesk 800 G1 (TWR and SFF) will work with FOG 0.32, which I’m using.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      M
      madeyem
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 2 / 6