• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. madeyem
    3. Posts
    M
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 9
    • Posts 116
    • Best 3
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by madeyem

    • RE: Fog not loading after ubuntu updates

      Maybe this?:

      https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/10006/ubuntu-is-fog-s-enemy?page=1

      posted in Linux Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth

      With the new init (20211107) I re-captured from a SSD machine and was finally able to deploy to a HDD machine. So I guess the fixes can be implemented in the next official release. Thank you Sebastian!

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth

      I re-captured an image on a SSD machine (with the new init) and deployed to the HDD machine, but got the same error message as before.

      From the re-captured image:

      d1.minimum.partitions:

      label: gpt
      label-id: 8C0CB60E-93F5-4C14-B633-3852928F826C
      device: /dev/nvme0n1
      unit: sectors
      first-lba: 34
      last-lba: 1000215182
      sector-size: 512
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p1 : start=        2048, size=     1433600, type=C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B, uuid=2AFFEC30-5F77-4C6B-BA7C-902A01A971E1, name="EFI system partition", attrs="GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p2 : start=     1435648, size=      262144, type=E3C9E316-0B5C-4DB8-817D-F92DF00215AE, uuid=E8336B4A-8C8F-48F5-85DE-E6237B7A372F, name="Microsoft reserved partition", attrs="GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p3 : start=     1697792, size=   995426761, type=EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7, uuid=38131294-BD57-43F5-ACE4-2E1413614C9A, name="Basic data partition"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p4 : start=   997126144, size=     1060864, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=A31B261E-E3EB-4671-BE66-F71AEEB51DB8, attrs="RequiredPartition GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p5 : start=   998187520, size=     2027520, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=84072955-EDFD-4E05-84E6-C3A6C50CDB30, name="attrs=\x22RequiredPartition GUID:63
      

      d1.partitions:

      label: gpt
      label-id: 8C0CB60E-93F5-4C14-B633-3852928F826C
      device: /dev/nvme0n1
      unit: sectors
      first-lba: 34
      last-lba: 1000215182
      sector-size: 512
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p1 : start=        2048, size=     1433600, type=C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B, uuid=2AFFEC30-5F77-4C6B-BA7C-902A01A971E1, name="EFI system partition", attrs="GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p2 : start=     1435648, size=      262144, type=E3C9E316-0B5C-4DB8-817D-F92DF00215AE, uuid=E8336B4A-8C8F-48F5-85DE-E6237B7A372F, name="Microsoft reserved partition", attrs="GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p3 : start=     1697792, size=   995426761, type=EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7, uuid=38131294-BD57-43F5-ACE4-2E1413614C9A, name="Basic data partition"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p4 : start=   997126144, size=     1060864, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=A31B261E-E3EB-4671-BE66-F71AEEB51DB8, attrs="RequiredPartition GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p5 : start=   998187520, size=     2027520, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=84072955-EDFD-4E05-84E6-C3A6C50CDB30, name="attrs=\x22RequiredPartition GUID:63"
      

      The third partition still seems to be too big (i.e. not shrunk), do you agree?

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

      Sure thing. As I said in my last post you should capture and deploy. In your case the already captured image doesn’t have the proper shrunken partition layout and therefore can’t be deployed to a smaller size disk I suppose. If you try deploy those Win 10 images to a large disk, do they fail just the same way? If so I ask you to take a picture of the error on screen and post that here.

      Ok, I think I might get my hands on one of the SSD machines later this (or next) week. I will then re-capture, deploy and report back.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      FYI:
      Just for the fun of it, I tried to deploy an Windows 7 image from 2018, which worked perfectly fine, but all my Windows 10 images fail.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

      @madeyem Please download this FOS init and try capture or deploy again. The issue should be fixed.

      I replaced the default init.xz with the one you linked and tried to deploy, but unfortunately I still get the same error message. The correct init version is shown (20211009).

      I can try to re-capture an image as soon as I have one of the SSD machines at my disposal (or when the new PCs I ordered finally arrive).

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

      @madeyem Please download this FOS init and try capture or deploy again. The issue should be fixed.

      I’m currently on vacation for two weeks. I will report back, as soon as I’m back in the office and have tested it. Thanks!

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

      @madeyem Ok, I had another look at this and I have to say that my initial thought was right. Your issue is caused by the same problem discussed in the other forum topic mentioned before.

      I can say that FOG 1.5.7 would not have been able to shrink this layout either I am pretty sure! 😉

      Proofed myself wrong!

      I will look into fixing what is causing this in the inits. Will let you know as soon as I have it ready for testing.

      Ok, thank you!

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

      @madeyem said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

      I can say, that I did not have any problems under FOG 1.5.7, which I used for a long time. I will see, what I can do.

      I can say that FOG 1.5.7 would not have been able to shrink this layout either I am pretty sure! 😉

      ok 😁

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

      @madeyem Don’t you have a so called master machine that you use to build your “golden setup” on to capture an image from (the same machine every time)?

      Unfortunately not.

      Not that I know of. We are missing some information here. No idea why this fails in your specific case. Does not seem to be a general issue.

      I can say, that I did not have any problems under FOG 1.5.7, which I used for a long time. I will see, what I can do.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

      So as a next step you want to add isdebug=yes ismajordebug=1 to the host settings (in Kernel Argument). Capture once again and take another series of pictures.

      Is there a way to troubleshoot this without having to re-capture? The PC I used for re-capturing is now being used by a new colleague. I am currently out of PCs (new ones are ordered, but have long delivery times).

      I currently only have older PCs here, but can’t deploy said image to them as described in my opening post.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

      Please schedule a debug capture task on the source host/drive and take pictures of the whole capture process so we see what’s actually happening.

      There you go:

      https://imgur.com/a/dNq1AWF

      (Imgur screwed up the right order of the pictures)

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth After applying the steps described here for my partitions 4 and 5, it’s still not working. After deploying in debug mode, I get this output:

      debug_deploy

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      @sebastian-roth I will try the solution from the thread you referred to and report back.

      Another question:

      After updating to 1.5.9.111, do I have to tell FOG to use a special init or so or is the fix included in the default init? So far I did not try any different settings after updating to 1.5.9.111.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

      Hi everyone,

      I’m on FOG 1.5.9.111 on Ubuntu Server 20.04.

      bzImage Version: 5.10.56
      bzImage32 Version: 5.10.56
      

      I am trying to deploy a Windows 10 20H2 UEFI image, which I took from an SSD machine on FOG 1.5.7, to a HDD machine, both SSD and HDD are 500 GB.

      I am having the same problem as described here:

      https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/14691/error-trying-to-restore-gpt-partition-when-deploying-image-to-smaller-drive-error-return-code-4?lang=de&page=1&sort=oldest_to_newest

      What I tried so far:

      1. Update from 1.5.9 to 1.5.9.111 to get the new inits.
      2. Create new image definition in UI.
      3. Re-Capture image from SSD machine.
      4. Deploy on HDD machine.

      But I still get the error (“partition 4 (and 5) too big for disk”).

      d1.minimum.partitions:

      label: gpt
      label-id: 8C0CB60E-93F5-4C14-B633-3852928F826C
      device: /dev/nvme0n1
      unit: sectors
      first-lba: 34
      last-lba: 1000215182
      sector-size: 512
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p1 : start=        2048, size=     1433600, type=C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B, uuid=2AFFEC30-5F77-4C6B-BA7C-902A01A971E1, name="EFI system partition", attrs="GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p2 : start=     1435648, size=      262144, type=E3C9E316-0B5C-4DB8-817D-F92DF00215AE, uuid=E8336B4A-8C8F-48F5-85DE-E6237B7A372F, name="Microsoft reserved partition", attrs="GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p3 : start=     1697792, size=   995418624, type=EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7, uuid=38131294-BD57-43F5-ACE4-2E1413614C9A, name="Basic data partition"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p4 : start=   997116416, size=     1071104, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=3F15511F-848F-4404-B079-FB3BE8D4EFB8, name="attrs=\x22RequiredPartition GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p5 : start=   998187520, size=     2027520, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=84072955-EDFD-4E05-84E6-C3A6C50CDB30, name="attrs=\x22RequiredPartition GUID:63"
      

      d1.partitions:

      label: gpt
      label-id: 8C0CB60E-93F5-4C14-B633-3852928F826C
      device: /dev/nvme0n1
      unit: sectors
      first-lba: 34
      last-lba: 1000215182
      sector-size: 512
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p1 : start=        2048, size=     1433600, type=C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B, uuid=2AFFEC30-5F77-4C6B-BA7C-902A01A971E1, name="EFI system partition", attrs="GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p2 : start=     1435648, size=      262144, type=E3C9E316-0B5C-4DB8-817D-F92DF00215AE, uuid=E8336B4A-8C8F-48F5-85DE-E6237B7A372F, name="Microsoft reserved partition", attrs="GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p3 : start=     1697792, size=   995418624, type=EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7, uuid=38131294-BD57-43F5-ACE4-2E1413614C9A, name="Basic data partition"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p4 : start=   997116416, size=     1071104, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=3F15511F-848F-4404-B079-FB3BE8D4EFB8, name="attrs=\x22RequiredPartition GUID:63"
      
      /dev/nvme0n1p5 : start=   998187520, size=     2027520, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=84072955-EDFD-4E05-84E6-C3A6C50CDB30, name="attrs=\x22RequiredPartition GUID:63"
      

      I’ve already read other threads regarding this problem, but I must be missing something. Any help would be appreciated.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG 1.5.8 and fog-client 0.11.19 Officially Released

      @Sebastian-Roth Ok, thank you.

      posted in Announcements
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG 1.5.8 and fog-client 0.11.19 Officially Released

      Is it recommended to update from 1.5.7 to 1.5.8 (on Ubuntu Server 16.04)? Some people seem to have had several types of problems after updating to 1.5.8.

      Thanks to all the devs for all your efforts!

      posted in Announcements
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: Updated Ubuntu and now cannot get to fog gui

      Sounds like it could be the problem described here:

      https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/10006/ubuntu-is-fog-s-enemy?page=1

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • RE: FOG and UEFI/M.2 SSD

      @matt-lowrey said in FOG and UEFI/M.2 SSD:

      I’m going to attempt to create a new fresh image using AHCI instead of RAID. If this works, I have no problem using AHCI instead of RAID.

      Ok, but you can switch your existing RAID On Windows installation to AHCI, following the steps from the link. I did it with my new Dell Optiplex 5070 SFF, which came with an RAID On installation of Windows 10. I also had to disable Secure Boot and enable UEFI Network stack in BIOS to make it bootable with FOG.

      posted in FOG Problems
      M
      madeyem
    • 1 / 1