@Sebastian-Roth I did do a side by side comparison between ubuntu configs and FOS linux configs and there are roughly 1800 differences. Many were in drivers and options. The only one that stood out in the efi section was CONFIG_EFI_MIXED which allowed a 32 bit EFI kernel boot a 64 bit linux kernel. Seems kind of strange, but we probably should turn that on.
Though a second process I started with an ia64 defconfig template and then added in the FOS required settings leaving almost all of the defconfig settings in place but adding in the fog required settings. I built this last night but haven’t had time to see if it boots. I did not add in the old ISA card network drivers or network adapters that I’m pretty sure are not in circulation like DEC Tulip network drivers. That kernel came in at 15MB as compared to the FOS kernel of 10MB. I’m not really worried about that extra 5MB kernel in size in 2023. This kernel is based on linux 6.5.3.
The other thing I need to point out is the the OPs platform is a server with an intel scalable processor. I don’t know what other hardware might be getting in the way. The FOS kernel should at least try to boot, it might not boot completely but should at least try to boot. We are not seeing that. By building the FOS usb boot drive we have eliminated all of the pxe and ipxe issues so we’ve narrowed it down to the FOS kernel, and swapping in the ubuntu kernel points directly to the FOS kernel at fault.
I hadn’t considered a ubuntu kernel patch to be the solution here either. I used linux 6.5.3 thinking that it should have all of the mainstream patches already in it.





