@Tom-Elliott Awesome sounds good. Another one can be marked as Solved
Posts
-
RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"posted in Bug Reports
-
RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"posted in Bug Reports
@Tom-Elliott No, but I just did now and it is working! Thank you. So for now, whenever I update FOG, I should copy over that init until it is worked into the dev or release version?
-
RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"posted in Bug Reports
@Tom-Elliott Thanks.
I grabbed the new init.xz and copied it to /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/ and I was still able to capture the an image from the PC with FOG 1.5.10.1667. I updated FOG to the latest 1.5.10.1771 and tried to capture from the PC again and it failed with same error. -
RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"posted in Bug Reports
Yes, I will test these as soon as they are available and have access to the PC, around 2pm EST. Just to confirm, the steps to test would be - update to 1.5.10.1771, then drop the everything into /var/www/html/fog/service/ipxe/ and try to capture again?
Thanks
-
RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"posted in Bug Reports
@Tom-Elliott Should add… I have 2 NVMe drives that are the same size. And since they initialize randomly at each boot, I can’t specify /dev/nvmeXXX
https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/14822/nvme-madness?_=1753960837885At some point, a few years ago, someone said you could use the drive serial number if both NVMe drives are the same size, and it’s been working for a long time now.
-
RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"posted in Bug Reports
Hello Tom,
Yes, I am using the disk serial number (21297930000130911023) in the Host Primary Disk field. It’s been working fine going on a few years now.
-
Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"posted in FOG Problems
FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771
Running on Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Last night, I captured an image from my PC. FOG was version 1.5.10.1667 everything went fine. Today I updated to FOG 1.5.10.1771 then went to test capturing an image from that same PC, no changes were made hardware wise etc.
This happened. No valid drives foundNOTE: I use the drive serial number for Host Primary Disk because I have 2 NVME drives which are the same size. <— Could this be the problem?

I bypassed PXE boot and went into Windows fine.
I restored the FOG server (It’s running in a VM) from a backup prior back to 14 hours earlier version, when it was running 1.5.10.1667. And it captured fine. What is going on!?
-
Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"posted in Bug Reports
FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771
Running on Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Last night, I captured an image from my PC. FOG was version 1.5.10.1667 everything went fine. Today I updated to FOG 1.5.10.1771 then went to test capturing an image from that same PC, no changes were made hardware wise etc.
This happened. No valid drives foundNOTE: I use the drive serial number for Host Primary Disk because I have 2 NVME drives which are the same size. <— Could this be the problem?

I bypassed PXE boot and went into Windows fine.
I restored the FOG server (It’s running in a VM) from a backup prior back to 14 hours earlier version, when it was running 1.5.10.1667. And it captured fine. What is going on!?
-
FOG Dashboard showing wrong date of captured images?posted in FOG Problems
Fog 1.5.10.1667 Running on Ubuntu Server 24.04.2 LTS
The PC’s the images were captured from were set to use Windows time.
The FOG server, tzlocal is set correctly to NY Time and so is fog.The 3 images from the 2 PC’s were captured a little past 4:AM July 16th. But the dashboard shows they were captured on the 15th.

The image section under FOG shows the correct date and UTC time the images were captured not local but that isn’t a big deal and I can’t figure out how to change it to show local time.

I set both Windows PC’s to use UTC time, then captured an image again.
It is 6:19pm July 16th The FOG server and both Windows PC’s know this

But the FOG Dashboard see’s all 4 images being captured on July 15th

The FOG Images section shows it was captured today but doesn’t show local time even though FOG is set to NY timezone


-
Resize Test Failed - Could not adjust bad sector list - But drive is cleanposted in FOG Problems
FOG 1.5.10.1667
Running on Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
I updated to the latest FOG dev version a couple of days ago and tried capturing an image from my PC after installing July 8, 2025—KB5062554 (OS Builds 19044.6093 and 19045.6093) Win 10 LTSC Enterprise
I got
This error

I ran a chkdsk /x/r/f on reboot, drive came up clean
Error persists even after running chkdsk /x/r/f, then trying to capture.
I rebooted the FOG server, then installed the previous version FOG 1.5.10.1660 - Same problem
Crystal Mark Info shows SMART is good, drive is fine. I restored the last captured image to the PC, ran the Windows Update and tried to capture, same error.
-
RE: After updating from .1622 - Could not boot: Result too large - Chain loading failed.posted in FOG Problems
@Tom-Elliott All good with 1.5.10.1629
Thanks
-
After updating from .1622 - Could not boot: Result too large - Chain loading failed.posted in FOG Problems
After updating from 1.5.10.1622 to 1.5.10.1625, I went to capture and image and got error message in the subject. Then I saw After updating from 1.5.10.1628 was available so I updated to that,

What do?
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTSposted in FOG Problems
I’ve found a work around. I now have /images on USB HDD passed through the to VM. When I run a standard back up of the VM via the VM software (Virtualization Station), it only back-ups the OS VM drive.
For the /images drive - I use a sync program to back-up the files, not the disk .
-
How to refresh "Image Size" ON SERVERposted in FOG Problems
I thought I’d posted about this before but it doesn’t show up in my post history. After capturing an image, Image Size ON SERVER shows as 0 or sometimes 1GB/MB. All the partitions and other information were captured successfully in /images/[imagename] and are the correct size. Once the FOG server is rebooted, Image Size ON SERVER displays correctly.
Thank you
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTSposted in FOG Problems
@JJ-Fullmer said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
How big of an issue is this disk size inflation for you?
It’s not a big deal. I’ve since stopped capturing non-OS drives and now use file sync / mirror program to back those up. I actually like that better than huge image captures once a week. Currently, FOG is just capturing 2 relatively small OS drive images.
All this is running on a QNAP box someone gave me and QNAP’s Virtualization Station software is lacking features to cleanup/shrink or compact virtual machine disks.
This all started out as a Feature Request
https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/17651/local-time-and-alternate-temp-directory-for-capture-option
It’s odd that linux/php are having this limitation but that’s where we’re at.
Is this something the devs would change if it was brought to their attention?
Thanks
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTSposted in FOG Problems
Ok I think I have it set up how you asked
New mount points



Symlinks


Gonna try to capture will report back
Same thing.

-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTSposted in FOG Problems
@JJ-Fullmer said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
@Fog_Newb I think I found the problem.
Normally the ftp_rename command successfully handles moving the captured image from
/images/devto/imagesbut for some reason that command ( a built in php/ftp thing) doesn’t like it when the directories are mounted on separate disks. Not sure why, doesn’t make a ton of sense, but that’s the issue.That makes sense to me especially if that command is only able to rename.
Basically I think you may have found a bug in a failsafe method for uploading a captured image.
Cool cool?