@Small0145 No, it’s not.
Posts made by Fog_Newb
-
Resize Test Failed - Could not adjust bad sector list - But drive is clean
FOG 1.5.10.1667
Running on Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
I updated to the latest FOG dev version a couple of days ago and tried capturing an image from my PC after installing July 8, 2025—KB5062554 (OS Builds 19044.6093 and 19045.6093) Win 10 LTSC Enterprise
I got
This errorI ran a chkdsk /x/r/f on reboot, drive came up clean
Error persists even after running chkdsk /x/r/f, then trying to capture.
I rebooted the FOG server, then went back to FOG 1.5.10.1660 - Same problem
Crystal Mark Info shows SMART is good, drive is fine. I restored the last captured image to the PC, ran the Windows Update and tried to capture, same error.
-
RE: After updating from .1622 - Could not boot: Result too large - Chain loading failed.
@Tom-Elliott All good with 1.5.10.1629
Thanks
-
After updating from .1622 - Could not boot: Result too large - Chain loading failed.
After updating from 1.5.10.1622 to 1.5.10.1625, I went to capture and image and got error message in the subject. Then I saw After updating from 1.5.10.1628 was available so I updated to that,
What do?
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
I’ve found a work around. I now have /images on USB HDD passed through the to VM. When I run a standard back up of the VM via the VM software (Virtualization Station), it only back-ups the OS VM drive.
For the /images drive - I use a sync program to back-up the files, not the disk .
-
How to refresh "Image Size" ON SERVER
I thought I’d posted about this before but it doesn’t show up in my post history. After capturing an image, Image Size ON SERVER shows as 0 or sometimes 1GB/MB. All the partitions and other information were captured successfully in /images/[imagename] and are the correct size. Once the FOG server is rebooted, Image Size ON SERVER displays correctly.
Thank you
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
@JJ-Fullmer said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
How big of an issue is this disk size inflation for you?
It’s not a big deal. I’ve since stopped capturing non-OS drives and now use file sync / mirror program to back those up. I actually like that better than huge image captures once a week. Currently, FOG is just capturing 2 relatively small OS drive images.
All this is running on a QNAP box someone gave me and QNAP’s Virtualization Station software is lacking features to cleanup/shrink or compact virtual machine disks.
This all started out as a Feature Request
https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/17651/local-time-and-alternate-temp-directory-for-capture-option
It’s odd that linux/php are having this limitation but that’s where we’re at.
Is this something the devs would change if it was brought to their attention?
Thanks
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
Ok I think I have it set up how you asked
New mount points
Symlinks
Gonna try to capture will report back
Same thing.
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
@JJ-Fullmer said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
@Fog_Newb I think I found the problem.
Normally the ftp_rename command successfully handles moving the captured image from
/images/dev
to/images
but for some reason that command ( a built in php/ftp thing) doesn’t like it when the directories are mounted on separate disks. Not sure why, doesn’t make a ton of sense, but that’s the issue.That makes sense to me especially if that command is only able to rename.
Basically I think you may have found a bug in a failsafe method for uploading a captured image.
Cool cool?
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
@Tom-Elliott said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
I will definitely try this. Just to make sure I understand how you want these new directories mounted…
sudo mkdir /images1 sudo mkdir /imagesdev1
Then adjust fstab so ‘/images1’ is a mount point for one drive (where /images was mounted), and ‘/imagesdev1’ is a mount point for the other drive (where /images/dev was mounted. Mount them, once mounted then I do…
After mounting these, new mount points, everything that was in /images and /images/dev is now in /images1 and /imagesdev1
sudo rm -rf /images sudo rm -rf /images/dev sudo ln -s /images1 /images sudo ln -s /imagesdev1 /images/dev
Then capture an image and see what happens
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
@JJ-Fullmer said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
@Fog_Newb I am able to recreate the problem in the latest stable version (1.5.10.1615). Working it out. it looks like the image does stay in dev on my end.
I’ll debug this when I can this week.Awesome. Thanks.
Then you could at least manually move the image from dev to images to workaround the issue while we work this out.
I have another FOG server set up where /images and /images/dev are on the same drive so I can continue using that until things get sorted.
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
@JJ-Fullmer said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
@Fog_Newb Fog is creating NFS shares from your 2 disks at those mount points. If they were not shared, imaging would not work. On the server the paths are mounted to different disks. And then each of those paths are shared, you can see this if you run
cat /etc/exports
where the shares are defined.Oh I see
Why is /images ro? Shouldn’t it be rw? How do I change that? I’m going to edit the /etc/exports file and change /images to rw and test
So I edited it - from ro to rw saved and rebooted but same results.
I guess ro is the way /images is supposed to be as far as /etc/exports
https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/security/advisories/GHSA-3xjr-xf9v-hwjh
So in 1.6 does the image stay in the dev folder?
Yes
What is the size of the file when it creates a file instead of a folder?
0 bytes
What is your php version?
php - v
8.3.6
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
@JJ-Fullmer said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
So /images and /images/dev are 2 nfs shares on your FOG server.
They are both local drives on the FOG server formatted GUID ext4. Everything is on that machine. There aren’t any network drives or shares.
Try moving/copying a file from /images/dev to /images on the server directly, confirm that works.
Yes, moving and copying from /images/dev to /images and visa versa works fine.
Try booting into a debug capture session, capture the image (use the command fog and hit enter to step through. Capture any errors.
There are no errors during the debug capture process.
Oddly enough, FOG/FOS will attempt to create the directory on /images, but it creates a file instead.
So, If I try to capture a new image named “BigBox”, after the capture there will be a file, not a directory, in /images named “BigBox”, - but that is it. Everything else stays in /images/dev/{mac}/*
Updated - I’ve tried FOG 1.5.10.1615 (coming from FOG 1.5.10.1612) and 1.6.0-beta.2130. Same results and no errors during debug-capture.
*1.6.0-beta.2130 does not create a file named after the image in /images
P.S. I now see what you mean by “the random numbers” being MAC addresses (the temp directories for the images). I thought you were talking about the other ‘random numbers’
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
@JJ-Fullmer said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
- FOS is writing to the /images/dev share
- FOS can’t move the files from one share to another when the shares are on different disks.
exactly
FOS is mounting both nfs shares correctly.
In my case, there’s no NFS shares involved, unless I’m misunderstanding.
/images and /images/dev are ‘mount points’ of the 2nd and 3rd local hard-drives on the VM. Maybe I’ve been using the term ‘mount points’ incorrectly
Also, just an FYI, it’s not random numbers, it’s the mac address of the host being captured.
When I mentioned random numbers I was talking about the numbers listed during the ubuntu install for the disk drive device numbers.
They weren’t the UUID’s of the drives or partitions and looked too long to be MAC addresses
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
@Tom-Elliott said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
Manually moving a directory (which couldn’t possibly fit on vda) from /images/dev (vdc) to /images (vdb) caused the virtual disk size on vdb to increase. IMHO, it seems clear the directory was initially stored on vdc. Am I wrong in assuming this confirms that the mounts are correctly configured and functioning?
Yes. vdb is /images, so moving a file from /images/dev (vdc) to /images (vdb) should cause the disk to increase on vdb? The sice on vdc wouldn’t decrease but the amount of usable space off vdc should be increased by the amount of the file that was moved to now vdb?
That’s what I’m understanding here. I don’t know if this means there is an issue or if this is working as intended, but it seems like it is?
That is what I was thinking - I was trying to establish that the mount points are set up correctly and that it’s not an issue with fstab.
It only takes a few minutes or so to spin one of these VM’s. I spun up another VM, same parameters and mount points. The only things added other than the ssh server during the Ubuntu install were - the Ubuntu updates, dnsmasq, pip, tzlocal, tz… and of course the latest FOG dev version 1.5.10.1614. All cloud services, disabled
I exported it to OVF right before registering a host and capturing an image… which exhibited the same problems.
If you or anyone else wants to check it out
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GPJH0ZuJFZaTqmGvIe1EM2HBCVlde4FI/view?usp=sharing
username: test
password: 123456All 3 VM drive images are included with the OVF. A 2.8 GB zip since the drives have barely anything on them.
Fog web interface - user and password are defaults
It takes a ridiculously long time to import the OVF into VMWare Workstation. But it will import
If you want it quick and dirty create a new UEFI based Linux VM and chose to use the existing vmdk drives contained in the zip.
A copy of the conf file used by dnsmasq is in the home directory
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
I think this thread has gotten a bit off track, partly due to my explanation about trying to modify an existing FOG server.
So, if I could - Let’s forget about the old FOG server - a re-cap - the new ‘test’ FOG server.
Fresh Ubuntu 24.04.1 install with 3 drives. During the install process, I created mount points for /images (vdb), and /images/dev (vdc)
each drive has a unique UUID
mount points correct
fstab created by the Ubuntu installer
I installed FOG 1.5.10.1612 without any issues—no errors at all. During the installation, the FOG installer successfully wrote files and set permissions on both mount points (/images/dev (vdc) and /images (vdb)). And all the files that should be in each directory/mount are present when compared to a functioning FOG server.
When capturing an image, it gets stuck in the temporary location /images/dev/[randomnumbers] and never moves to the /images directory.
executing both
sudo chown -R fogproject:fogproject /images
and
sudo chmod 775 -R /images
then re-testing/capturing - no change
Manually moving a directory (which couldn’t possibly fit on vda) from /images/dev (vdc) to /images (vdb) caused the virtual disk size on vdb to increase. IMHO, it seems clear the directory was initially stored on vdc. Am I wrong in assuming this confirms that the mounts are correctly configured and functioning?
Anyway, it’s not a big deal. I just wanted to make sure I’ve at least clarified everything
Thanks
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
@AUTH-IT-Center said in FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS:
try the below
/dev/disk/by-uuid/d61ab2ae-b79a-4b07-bfc5-4678ab0902f4 /images ext4 defaults 0 1 /dev/disk/by-uuid/3d7874cb-8c59-4e6d-8735-fb8361994590 /imagesdev ext4 defaults 0 1 /imagesdev /images/dev none defaults,bind 0 0
Sources:
Same results only - the changes you suggested making to fstab created /imagesdev along with /images/dev on vcd. Both are bound together.
Create a file in /imagesdev it is seen in /images/dev and vis-a vers-a.
-
RE: FOG has issues if the temp image location is on another drive. FOG 1.5.10.1612 Ubuntu Server24.04.1 LTS
If you’re looking at the Storage Configuration screen cap, those numbers are something else and are slightly different. The end numbers - 01, 02, 03
The UUID’s for vda1, vda2, vdb, and vdc are different