• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Fog_Newb
    F
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 52
    • Posts 251
    • Best 16
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Fog_Newb

    @Fog_Newb

    17
    Reputation
    14
    Profile views
    251
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    Fog_Newb Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by Fog_Newb

    • It looks like FOG is working with Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

      SOLVED

      I was on 18.04 and ran “sudo do-release-upgrade -d”, It finished, I rebooted and was able to access the FOG web interface and deploy an image. I am running the latest stable version: 1.5.8

      UPDATE: I had some issues when I upgraded to 20.04 on a different FOG box. It has been resolved.

      Thanks

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: PHP 8 support

      @sebastian-roth The error during the FOG install on 21.10 is related to installing php 8.0 mysql

      Error

      If I try to manually install php8.0-mysql it appears to be installed already

      Already installed

      The GUI works fine and capturing an image goes smoothly until the end where the database needs to be updated

      Wow, so I ran the FOG installer again, this time there wasn’t an error when it came to the mysql install.

      All good?

      Going to try capturing an image now.

      Hmm. It still fails to update the database.

      Failed

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: It looks like FOG is working with Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

      @Sebastian-Roth

      Yes.

      I just want to add real quick, the DC 7800’s can boot to the menu with any kernel and without and kernel parameters. They fail when deploying.

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Secure Boot Support for Windows 11

      I installed the leaked dev version 21996/21996.1 on bare metal and in a VM. Secure Boot didn’t have to be enabled . UEFI and TPM (which requires CSM to be disabled) had to be. Secure Boot - the option only had to be present.

      After more testing. I found I could install it in a VM as Legacy. I guess MS laxed on the VM requirements?

      I also found on metal, I could disable TPM and enable CSM which should make secure boot completely unavailable. Then I deploy a sysprep-ed Win 11OOBE UEFI image on it without any problems.

      I will try pure legacy on metal next…

      This was with that leaked dev build so who knows if it was modified or what not and how close it is to the actual dev build release or the final release.

      posted in Feature Request
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • Include partclone 3.20?

      3.13 that comes on the latest dev-branch as of today has issues with APFS on my laptop.

      pic

      3.20 x64 does not

      pic

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Fog Dashboard shows one queued. How do I clear this?

      @Sebastian-Roth

      Hell yeah dude, that cleared it right up.

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: FOG 1.5.9-RC2 incompatible with Windows 10 v2004 Partition Structure

      @Sebastian-Roth

      Not sure if this has been resolved or if this helps -

      I’ve created a Win 10 UEFI VM using the 2004 ISO. VMware® Workstation 15 Pro 15.5.6 build-16341506. All the settings were default except I went up tp 8GB of RAM. I installed it, ran all the updates, activated it while waiting for updates, rebooted twice then captured the image with FOG dev-branch version: 1.5.9-RC2.11 running on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

      It deployed fine to a similar VM.

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Include partclone 3.20?

      @sebastian-roth Thanks. I just updated to the latest. So far it is capturing an APFS drive on a hackintosh no problem.

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: NVMe madness

      @Sebastian-Roth

      So yes, this is a perfect solution since Primary host disk can now be set by size. I have one image for the OS disk, and one for the “D” drive. I just switch the Primary Host disk setting depending on which image I want to capture or deploy.

      posted in General
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: UGH T2 Chip nightmare - Anyone using FOG with T2 macs

      @george1421 I boot from a FOS usb stick that pxe boots to the FOG server. So I am thinking put the T2 Kernel on the server and specify that kernel under the “host kernel” setting for the macs, then on the the FOS stick put the t2 kernel as well?

      posted in Mac Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb

    Latest posts made by Fog_Newb

    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott Fog now tells me the latest dev version and the one I have is 1.5.10.1671

      alt text

      Was 1.5.10.1771 all a bad dream or were we both mistakenly calling 1.5.10.1671 1.5.10.1771?

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott Thanks. I grabbed a full fresh release but haven’t had a chance to reinstall 1.5.10.1771 over itself to confirm the included inits work. But if they are the same inits you posted earlier… it definitely should

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott Awesome sounds good. Another one can be marked as Solved

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott No, but I just did now and it is working! Thank you. So for now, whenever I update FOG, I should copy over that init until it is worked into the dev or release version?

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott Thanks.
      I grabbed the new init.xz and copied it to /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/ and I was still able to capture the an image from the PC with FOG 1.5.10.1667. I updated FOG to the latest 1.5.10.1771 and tried to capture from the PC again and it failed with same error.

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott sounds good!

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott

      Yes, I will test these as soon as they are available and have access to the PC, around 2pm EST. Just to confirm, the steps to test would be - update to 1.5.10.1771, then drop the everything into /var/www/html/fog/service/ipxe/ and try to capture again?

      Thanks

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott Should add… I have 2 NVMe drives that are the same size. And since they initialize randomly at each boot, I can’t specify /dev/nvmeXXX
      https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/14822/nvme-madness?_=1753960837885

      At some point, a few years ago, someone said you could use the drive serial number if both NVMe drives are the same size, and it’s been working for a long time now.

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • RE: Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      @Tom-Elliott

      Hello Tom,

      Yes, I am using the disk serial number (21297930000130911023) in the Host Primary Disk field. It’s been working fine going on a few years now.

      posted in Bug Reports
      F
      Fog_Newb
    • Updated from FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771 Fatal Error: No valid drives found "Host Primary Disk"

      FOG 1.5.10.1667 to 1.5.10.1771

      Running on Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS

      Last night, I captured an image from my PC. FOG was version 1.5.10.1667 everything went fine. Today I updated to FOG 1.5.10.1771 then went to test capturing an image from that same PC, no changes were made hardware wise etc.
      This happened. No valid drives found

      NOTE: I use the drive serial number for Host Primary Disk because I have 2 NVME drives which are the same size. <— Could this be the problem?

      alt text

      I bypassed PXE boot and went into Windows fine.

      I restored the FOG server (It’s running in a VM) from a backup prior back to 14 hours earlier version, when it was running 1.5.10.1667. And it captured fine. What is going on!?

      posted in FOG Problems
      F
      Fog_Newb