@Sebastian-Roth
I’ve updated FOG this morning:

@Sebastian-Roth said:

Edit: Found an interesting parameter for the udhcpc. Tom added it to the inits. You might want to upgrade and run the installer again to get the latest inits. This might possibly fix things for you…

So, I’m making init with updated script

@Wayne-Workman said:

@aruhuno Just an FYI, the E73 is in our working hardware list: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php?title=WorkingDevices

On FOG 1.2.0, yes, but not on 1.3.0 and I need it to deploy Windows 10 with FOG Client.

Following a discussion with @Sebastian-Roth, we finally found it!
The problem is the speed negotiation with the switch . I’ll update the firmware of the switches and make feedback.

Thank you guys, here’s the procedure I finally used:

• export old FOG database (OLD_fog.sql)
• export new FOG database (NEW_fog.sql)
• delete all tables in new FOG database
• import old FOG database
• upgrade via FOG interface
• export hosts via UI
• delete all tables
• import backup of new FOG database
• import hosts via UI (no upgrade needed)

SOLVED !

Thanks @Wayne-Workman and @ch3i !

I’m testing my ftp and have a problem

root@fogsrv:~# ftp 192.168.0.39
Connected to 192.168.0.39.
220 (vsFTPd 2.3.5)
Name (192.168.0.39:root): fog
331 Please specify the password.
Password:
230 Login successful.
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> ls
200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV.
150 Here comes the directory listing.
226 Directory send OK.
ftp> cd /images
250 Directory successfully changed.
ftp> ls
200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV.
150 Here comes the directory listing.
drwxr-xr-x    2 0        0            4096 Jun 11  2014 2014-06-11_Win7ent64
drwxrwxrwx    2 0        0            4096 Apr 17 07:16 2015-04_win7_Lenovo
drwxr-xr-x    2 0        0            4096 Sep 24 12:17 2015-08_win10
drwxrwxrwx    3 0        0            4096 Sep 24 10:51 dev
drwxrwxrwx    5 0        0            4096 May 12 09:11 fog_boot
drwxrwxrwx    2 0        0           16384 Nov 19  2012 lost+found
drwxrwxrwx    2 0        0            4096 Oct 14  2014 postdownloadscripts
226 Directory send OK.
ftp> put test.txt
local: test.txt remote: test.txt
200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV.
553 Could not create file.
ftp> ls
200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV.
150 Here comes the directory listing.
drwxr-xr-x    2 0        0            4096 Jun 11  2014 2014-06-11_Win7ent64
drwxrwxrwx    2 0        0            4096 Apr 17 07:16 2015-04_win7_Lenovo
drwxr-xr-x    2 0        0            4096 Sep 24 12:17 2015-08_win10
drwxrwxrwx    3 0        0            4096 Sep 24 10:51 dev
drwxrwxrwx    5 0        0            4096 May 12 09:11 fog_boot
drwxrwxrwx    2 0        0           16384 Nov 19  2012 lost+found
drwxrwxrwx    2 0        0            4096 Oct 14  2014 postdownloadscripts
226 Directory send OK.
ftp> quit
221 Goodbye.

@Tom-Elliott This is not a credential issue but directory…

Bad value during install ?

/var/www/fogservice/ipxe/

Instead of:

/var/www/fog/service/ipxe/

Kernel is downgraded at 3.19.3 and everything works!

I just want to clarify that whatever the machine used (Optiplex or ThinkCentre), the first screenshot remains true.

@ch3i: I’m sorry, I don’t see my “images” directory permission are false, it’s ok now!

@Tom-Elliott: Yeah, it’s ok now, I don’t understand why their permissions changed… but, it’s ok

Thanks a lot for all !

@Sebastian-Roth
DC synchronize time only with computers added in AD but FOGClient can’t add computer in AD…
I found a solution by synchronizing time just before the sysprep command.

edit: I finally installs the client after deploying the post via a script called by unattended file.

Hello,

First
When installing on a Debian stable (8.5):

Skipping package: php5-bcmath...............................(Does not exist)

Package does not exist in current stable of Debian but exist in Ubuntu (Xenial, without 5 in name).

Second
When I try to deploy a snapin on computer that as no attached snapin:

Thank you for your work!

Server

• FOG Version: 1.5.6
• OS: Debian 9.9
• Kernel: 4.19.48 TomElliott 64 and 4.19.48 TomElliott 32

Client

• Model: Lenovo X1 Carbon Gen6
• Dock: Lenovo Dock USB-C DK1633
• OS: Windows 10 Pro 64
• Secure boot: disabled

Description
Hello,

I’ve the same problem on Lenovo X1 Gen 6.
As @george1421 suggested, I turned to FOS. Unfortunately I don’t understand the documentation to build an image.

Thanks for your help.

Solution
This works well with the adapter provided by Lenovo.

@george1421 said in [ipxe.efi] No menu with Optiplex 3010:

The issues with the Dell x90s and x010s are know, but thank you for confirming on 390 and 3010 variants.

Yes, but it’s for wiki =]

@george1421 said in [ipxe.efi] No menu with Optiplex 3010:

As for the 3020s, I know that uefi device initialization does take time. Its almost at the point where you think its locked up, it will finish initializing the device.

Exactly and it’s aggaining!

@george1421 said in [ipxe.efi] No menu with Optiplex 3010:

FWIW, refind is used on the other end. When leaving the FOG iPXE menu to attempting to boot from the local uefi hard drive. So refind will not help you get iPXE to run.

Yes I know, but SANBOOT does not work.

@george1421 said in [ipxe.efi] No menu with Optiplex 3010:

You can use the FOS usb boot stick if you need to image these systems to bypass pxe booting if you need.

It’s true, but UEFI is only for test at the moment. I’ve made an image for notebook now.

@george1421
For my part, I tested on several models with BIOS update:

• Optiplex 390 (BIOS A05): not capable
• Optiplex 390 (BIOS A14): same as above
• Optiplex 3010 (BIOS A17): does not work, devices initialization never ends
• Optiplex 3010 (BIOS A21): same as above
• Optiplex 3020 (BIOS A03): works, but devices initialization is very slow (REFIND_EFI recommended?)
• Optiplex 3020 (BIOS A18): same as above

I did not test 7xx/7xxx series because they have the same behavior than 3xx/3xxxx series.

@george1421
Thanks for your guick answer.
So, can I update this page ?
I will test on a 390 and a 790 also shot. I have Lenovo E73 too.

Server

• FOG Version: 1.5.4
• OS: Debian 9.5
• Kernel: 4.18.3 TomElliott 64

Description

Hello,

I recently created a new Windows 10 image in UEFI. The capture was done from VMware vSphere without too much trouble. I wanted to test the deployment of the image on one of our stations and here is what I have as a message:

I have of course followed the following documentation: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php?title=BIOS_and_UEFI_Co-Existence

Thank you for your help.

It works with %WINDIR%\sysnative\windowspowershell\v1.0\powershell.exe!
Why FOG don’t use by default this path?

Thanks a lot for your help!

edit: can you mark the post from Joe as solution please?

My apologies for my absence.

@Wayne-Workman
I think you put your finger on the problem.

@jbsclm
AVG don’t remove this key.

@joe-schmitt
%WINDIR%\sysnative\windowspowershell\v1.0\powershell.exe does not exist.
I test with %SystemRoot%\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe but not working…

Server

• FOG Version: 1.5.0
• OS: Debian 9.4

Client

• Service Version: 0.11.15
• OS: Windows 7, 8.1 and 10 LTSB

Description

Hello,

I created a script to uninstall AVG Protection and then install Trend Agent Security. The script works perfectly in a Powershell window. By snapin, line 10 does not work. Do you have an idea ?

To see the script (sorry for french comment) : https://framagit.org/alexandre.LG/shared_on_inios/blob/8c62e0f109a5948e0d064cc9f17928922d17c208/deployTrendSecurityAgent.ps1

Thanks in advance for your help.

Thanks for your answer @Tom-Elliott and sorry, I had not seen that detail. The task should be deleted when it is completed, as for snapins. Or put an icon as for ping stations.

Server

• FOG Version: 1.3.5
• OS: Debian 8.6

Client

• Service Version: 0.11.11
• OS: Windows 7, 8.1 and 10

Description

Hello,

I created a delayed snapin task but it doesn’t work. I read somewhere that it’s necessary to modify some files for GMT compatibility but for tests, I’ve programmed two tasks at two different hours. First task, detailed in the video below, run two minutes after programmed time. The second task is programmed to start at 22:00.

https://youtu.be/c683-fMhcn8

This morning not any task has run.

Thanks in advance for your help.