• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. oelked
    O
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 1
    • Topics 3
    • Posts 12
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 1

    oelked

    @oelked

    0
    Reputation
    2
    Profile views
    12
    Posts
    1
    Followers
    1
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    Location Landkreis Mansfeld - Südharz

    oelked Unfollow Follow
    FOG Hangouts

    Latest posts made by oelked

    • RE: Display problem client groups

      @Tom-Elliott Hello, no problem
      I’m now using the Persistent Groups plugin for now until I have more time to think deeper into the system in order to create my own plugin to solve my problem.

      Nevertheless, thank you very much

      posted in Bug Reports
      O
      oelked
    • RE: Error creating locations

      Hello, no problem, I’ll try to describe it in more detail
      Steps to reproduce

      Create location

      • Set location name

      -Storage Group
      Establish

      • Storage Node
        Omit because Node is not yet created or exists

      • Set Storage Node Protocol HTTP

      • Use inits and kernels from this node True

      Add

      no error occurs

      Location is created.

      When you create another location using the same procedure, the previous one will be overwritten
      no new location will be created.

      This behavior only occurs if no storage node is stored.

      I noticed this behavior because I wanted to create my location structure in the master before I created all the storage nodes.

      posted in Bug Reports
      O
      oelked
    • RE: Error creating locations

      I have now discovered that the problem is not the number.
      it is because a storage node must be defined
      If there is no storage node stored for the last location created, the previously created location will be overwritten when a new location is created.

      Best regards

      posted in Bug Reports
      O
      oelked
    • RE: Display problem client groups

      Hello, there is a github page for the Persistent groups plugin where you can read it and find hardly any information about this plugin

      posted in Bug Reports
      O
      oelked
    • RE: Display problem client groups

      Hello,
      How can I understand this? At this point I only want to see the snapins that are assigned to the group and not all hosts.

      Isn’t it structured in such a way that the snapins from the group are passed on to the hosts

      posted in Bug Reports
      O
      oelked
    • RE: Display problem client groups

      Hi, unfortunately there is nothing there except available snapins
      Configured ones are not displayed there

      04.png

      posted in Bug Reports
      O
      oelked
    • RE: Display problem client groups

      I have already assigned snapins here once, but they are never displayed in the group itself.

      I always only have the option to add snapins and never see which ones have already been added

      03.png

      posted in Bug Reports
      O
      oelked
    • RE: Display problem client groups

      Hello
      There is certainly software that can do this better, but these usually have to be paid for.
      and unfortunately our department does not receive the necessary funds.
      That’s why we have to find other ways to do this

      Basically, Fog works really well for software management.

      posted in Bug Reports
      O
      oelked
    • RE: Nice to have

      Hello
      We primarily use Fog for software management on the clients
      This works relatively well, even if it wasn’t intended for that purpose.
      We would still like to keep this as this function is very convenient for us.

      You can certainly add the version number to the name.
      I actually wanted to avoid this because I can’t guarantee that there might be problems here in Fog if the name of an assigned packet changes all of a sudden.

      To the node status
      I currently know that you can read this in the logs

      One field in the dashboard for each storage node would be enough for me to operate it
      what the status is

      Example
      synchronization
      Ready
      Error

      If there are errors, you can read them in the log.

      Thank you for the great work on this project

      posted in Feature Request
      O
      oelked
    • Nice to have

      Hello, we currently have a fog network
      1 master
      and 4 storage nodes at different locations

      these are expected to increase by 19 over the next few years.

      The following things would simplify and improve the function.

      Snapin area

      Column with version number that is read from the .MSI, .EXE during upload or can be maintained manually

      Snapin update date column

      Dashboard area

      Synchronization status storage nodes
      or status in general

      posted in Feature Request
      O
      oelked