Problem loading /bzimage32...
-
@george1421
Oh thank you, that’s why I could not find these files ahah
I’ll try this!Edit:
It still doesn’t works with theses files on my DHCP server option 67:-undionly.kpxe
-undionly.kkpxe
-ipxe.pxe (with ipxe.pxe the load increases up to ~80% but it still freezes ).Now i don’t know what to do
-
I specify that my bench is virtualised with Virtualbox…
-
@Ph3noM Is the nic Natted or Bridged?
-
@Tom-Elliott “Internal network”
-
@Ph3noM Can you make it a bridged network, preferrably using E1000
-
@Tom-Elliott I used this to isolate my network-test from my company’s network. But i’ll try this tomorrow.
(Pardon my english )Anyway thanks guys for your replys!
-
Hi!
I used E1000 on my VMs aaaand it works! (But still in “internal network” mode)
Unfortunately, I am faced with a new problem, i can upload an image (from a XP client), but I can’t deploy it on the same Client (for testing)
I changed type of HDD controler, nothing new…Do you have some advices?
(I feel that I could never finish this properly ahah)ty
Edit: The client’s system is about ~5Go but the image’s size on the server is only 1,34Go, is it normal??
-
@Ph3noM It’s very normal that the size on disk is much smaller than the required disk to put the image on. This is because we compress the file as it’s being uploaded.
The problem you’re seeing with 1.2.0 and XP is well known about and was fixed in SVN version 2096 or 2097, I can’t remember which exactly, and the version of SVN 1.2.0 was released at was 2094, so you could fix this by installing trunk, specifically version 2097. But if you’re willing to upgrade to 2097, why not just go all in and use latest trunk? There have been MANY improvements and adjustments I’m sure you would find you actually like/prefer/enjoy.
-
No it’s ok now, i just made a mistake.
I am very happy!
Thanks all for the help! -
@Ph3noM said:
No it’s ok now, i just made a mistake.
I am very happy!
Thanks all for the help!What was the mistake?