Popularity Contest

[Sebastian Roth]

@Wayne-Workman Well done! Haven’t had a chance to test but looks fine on first sight.

May I ask you to rename it all. The word “analytics” has just so much background to it - we don’t do real analytics here…

[Wayne Workman]

What do you want it to be called?

Tom had used the “analytics” term in his suggestions which is why I named everything like that, as later on it might be expanded to do more than simply collecting versions. Originally I named everything “popularity”

[Tom Elliott]

@Wayne-Workman, @Sebastian-Roth

I think analytics is the appropriate term, even if the information we’re using is minimal.

I’ve added similar code, slightly revised.

Please take a look and let me know:

https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/1435d1b1852e452295359fb045f3bb38f01ba18f
This introduces the information - but I had a typo which is where the “second” link comes in.

AND

https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/acfc6445d3b8f9497bf2b63e69e3faec0c51ee51

Thank you,

[Wayne Workman]

@Tom-Elliott Looks fine to me. Should I submit a pull request to the dev-branch since you’ve already added this to the 1.6 branch?

[Tom Elliott]

@Wayne-Workman I think that’d work best, yes.

[Wayne Workman]

I’ve validated the installation code as I’ve written it does work against all the major distributions - and I’ve also discovered my daily test for Ubuntu 20 was really Ubuntu 18 (fixed now).

Below is what the data looks like in my test environment. It’s interesting to note that RedHat changes it’s distribution name from major release to major release. It’s of no consequence for our use, but I think that’s interesting.

The server-side’s code is in this PR:
https://github.com/FOGProject/fog-community-scripts/pull/62

The FOG Server’s code is in this PR:
https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/pull/405

[Sebastian Roth]

@Tom-Elliott said in Popularity Contest:

I think analytics is the appropriate term, even if the information we’re using is minimal.

I don’t agree! The term “analytics” implies way more than we do and it might turn down people who use FOG and don’t like analytic stuff that is going on all over the web.

Why should we name it something we don’t want to do - and I am absolutely sure I never add real analytics stuff to FOG myself.

[Wayne Workman]

Maybe we call it “Rainman”?

[Junkhacker]

@Wayne-Workman how about “install survey”

[Tom Elliott]

Analytics:

information resulting from the systematic analysis of data or statistics.

What are we gathering,
OS Name/Type, OS Version, FOG Version

What are we doing?
Analyzing how many of a type of OS and version, along with the number of “versions” run out in the wild.

While the data we’re gathering is, right now, only very basic, I think analytics is still the true term.

If we decide analytics is not the term to use, I still think it’s important to add (and I’m working on doing that) a way for the admins to disable if they don’t want their information being reported. We’re not doing much or collecting any metrics of the data in the sense of IPs or how we can best improve our code base. We are, after all, collecting and sending data to another source.

This information we are gathering is still a form of data we can use to gather what Operating Systems and versions, along with the general FOG version being used in the wild.

[Tom Elliott]

Added ability to turn on/off this “feature”.

  FOG would like to collect some data:
      We would like to collect the following information:
        1. OS Name (CentOS, RedHat, Debian, etc....)
        2. OS Version (8.0.2004, 7.2.1409, 9, etc....)
        3. FOG Version (1.5.9, 1.6, etc....)

  What is this information used for?
      We would like to simply track the common types of OS
      being used, along with the OS Version, and the various
      versions of FOG being used.

  Are you ok with sending this information? [Y/n]

When Selected either yes or no, the screen will tell status as well:

 * Here are the settings FOG will use:
 * Base Linux: Redhat
 * Detected Linux Distribution: CentOS Linux
 * Server IP Address: ....
 * Server Subnet Mask: ....
 * Hostname: fogserver
 * Installation Type: Normal Server
 * Internationalization: 0
 * Image Storage Location: /images
 * Using FOG DHCP: Yes
 * DHCP router Address: ...
 * Send OS Name, OS Version, and FOG Version: Yes

Or:

 * Here are the settings FOG will use:
 * Base Linux: Redhat
 * Detected Linux Distribution: CentOS Linux
 * Server IP Address: ....
 * Server Subnet Mask: ....
 * Hostname: fogserver
 * Installation Type: Normal Server
 * Internationalization: 0
 * Image Storage Location: /images
 * Using FOG DHCP: Yes
 * DHCP router Address: ...
 * Send OS Name, OS Version, and FOG Version: No

[Junkhacker]

@Tom-Elliott i think we should default to Y/n instead of y/N

most people don’t care one way or the other and will just click through, let the people who care chose not to send it

[Tom Elliott]

@Junkhacker working-1.6 has been updated with this.

I agree that most will not mind.

I just didn’t want people to get into this unknowningly.

I don’t know how many people use the -y switch, so that was why I wanted to “err” on keeping things as they are.

[Tom Elliott]

Instead of Analytics, or Rainman (though I love this movie), or “Install survey”

Something that’s more explicit to what it’s doing:

FOG External Reporting

[Wayne Workman]

FOG External Reporting sounds good to me. I’ll get the endpoint name changed sometime tonight and submit a PR for that.

I’m still needing to put together the last pieces of this, the presentation layer. This will be coming over the next couple weeks. Plans are to render some basic bar graphs showing the information gathered from the last 7 days, and to make available the database dump. Probably a cron-job to refresh those things every hour.

[Wayne Workman]

How exciting, entries! A whole lot of Ubuntu, one of them is Ubuntu 16!

[Wayne Workman]

Here is my first pass at the presentation layer: http://fog-external-reporting-results.theworkmans.us

The graphs/files/stats automatically are updated every hour. I think the graphs could use color adjustments, but overall I’m pretty satisfied. What do you all think? BTW, the data in here is real!

The next phase of this is abuse detection for the data reported. I need to scan for profanity, insults, etc; to keep the graphs clean. Python has tools for all of that.

[Sebastian Roth]

@Wayne-Workman Sounds awesome but right now I get a “Bad Gateway” message instead.

[Wayne Workman]

Fixed: http://fog-external-reporting-results.theworkmans.us/

[Sebastian Roth]

@Wayne-Workman Nice!

Looking at the data I am wondering how versions 1.5.2, 1.5.5 and 1.5.6 can make it into the database. From my point of view this is a good sign those installs still have an old version of the web UI sitting in /var/www/fog and the new one in /var/www/html/fog.

While I would hope we can figure out a way to detect those situations and let people know I would still think that we need a more generic way of grabbing the version info instead of using a static path for system.class.php.