• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    issue with netcard of dock gen2 of lenovo l390

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Hardware Compatibility
    5
    51
    8.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • george1421G
      george1421 Moderator @JJ Fullmer
      last edited by george1421

      @JJ-Fullmer said in issue with netcard of dock gen2 of lenovo l390:

      Do you see any reason that one shouldn’t use this kernel for all devices?

      There is no reason why you shouldn’t use this kernel. This is exactly the same kernel that ships with FOG 1.5.7 with the exception of the updated realtek driver and adding in the usb-c stuff.

      I started with the default FOS Linux settings for 1.5.7 and made the changes I posted. This was done so that the devs could duplicate what was done during our testing.

      I’ve just never had this good of an experience with a usb-c adapter and fog

      It would be interesting to see if your experiences with usb-c change with this kernel.

      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

      JJ FullmerJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JJ FullmerJ
        JJ Fullmer Testers @george1421
        last edited by

        @george1421 I’m making it my default kernel now then, I backed up the old one of course. I’ll report back if there are any problems, but I would assume all will work as expected.

        Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
        https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
        https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
        https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
        https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

        JJ FullmerJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • JJ FullmerJ
          JJ Fullmer Testers @JJ Fullmer
          last edited by

          @george1421 so some odd things to report with the new kernel as the default…
          One almost plus, I found that an acer switch 3 recognized the lenovo usb-c ethernet adapter as one that could pxe boot. It even almost worked but it is now frozen at ipxe initialising devices... In the past, no usb-c ethernet adapter would do a native pxe boot on this device, so that’s something. I guess I still don’t have one that will do a pxe boot.

          I went to image a new surface go with the microsoft usb-c ethernet adapter that was working in the past.
          I got this message after pxe boot completed and FOS was starting…
          1113191702b[1].jpg

          Sorry that it’s blurry, basically it says that the kernel is probably missing the correct driver. Doesn’t make a ton of sense that the fix for one usb-c ethernet adapter would break another. It isn’t impossible that microsoft’s adapter also uses a realtek chip and this chip doesn’t like the new driver. Why can’t they all just get along?

          I will try testing the old kernel and other things tomorrow.

          Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
          https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
          https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
          https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
          https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

          JJ FullmerJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JJ FullmerJ
            JJ Fullmer Testers @JJ Fullmer
            last edited by

            @george1421 I did do a test on a normal device (intel ethernet desktop type) and it did boot to the fog menu and started an image deploy without a problem on the new kernel. I set the surface go to use the old kernel (I have so many now I’m not actually 100% sure which one it is, but pretty sure its the one that shipped with 1.5.7) and it is now imaging properly, meaning that the new kernel does indeed fix one usb-c adapter and breaks a different one. I’ll get the details on the microsoft ethernet adapter if you want them tomorrow.

            Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
            https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
            https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
            https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
            https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

            george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • george1421G
              george1421 Moderator @JJ Fullmer
              last edited by george1421

              @JJ-Fullmer Well what I can do is this. I can reset the FOS Linux kernel back to 4.19.65 base then only apply the usb-c changes to see if its the realtek driver or the usb-c changes causing the troubles. If you have the hardware to test on.

              The other thing as like you said, we’ll need the nic vendor and hardware ID either from windows or via FOS Linux lspci or lsusb depending on how the nic is attached.

              Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

              JJ FullmerJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JJ FullmerJ
                JJ Fullmer Testers @george1421
                last edited by

                @george1421 Let the fun begin then, I have 4 of these that I need to setup today.

                the hardware ID in windows is USB\VID_045E&PID_0927&REV_3100
                I’ll get the linux bit shortly

                Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
                https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
                https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
                https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
                https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

                george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • george1421G
                  george1421 Moderator @JJ Fullmer
                  last edited by

                  @JJ-Fullmer Ah I see: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/10943/surface-pro-4-registration-issues/25

                  045E:0927 == realtek r8152. There are new fingerprints all over that driver. Let me see

                  Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                  JJ FullmerJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JJ FullmerJ
                    JJ Fullmer Testers @george1421
                    last edited by

                    @george1421 I believe that is a different dongle, the one I have is model 1860, that post references 1821 and 1663, but it’s a fair guess that it’s the same or similar driver. I’m troubleshooting a different problem on one at the moment, but will have it boot into a debug fog session and run lsusb on it on my next reboot.

                    Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
                    https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
                    https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
                    https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
                    https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

                    george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • george1421G
                      george1421 Moderator @JJ Fullmer
                      last edited by george1421

                      @JJ-Fullmer Ok well I added it because it wasn’t in the updated driver from realtek. As long as the hardware chip IDs are the same it should work no matter what model the dongle is.

                      https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RBLVzsFmXfTrn1sG0GE18usD-QOBs7Y6

                      File name is bzImageRT2

                      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                      JJ FullmerJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JJ FullmerJ
                        JJ Fullmer Testers @george1421
                        last edited by

                        @george1421 I was able to boot into a debug session on the surface go with this new kernel.
                        I don’t have the lenovo l390 to test on at the moment but should be able to test it today. I’ll test it on my lenovo x390 too, but gotta make sure they all work.

                        Here is the lsusb of the surface go usb-c ethernet adapter

                        lsusb
                        Bus 002 Device 002: ID 045e:0955
                        Bus 001 Device 020: ID 045e:096f
                        Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
                        Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0cf3:e302
                        Bus 001 Device 002: ID 045e:0957
                        Bus 002 Device 003: ID 045e:0927
                        Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003
                        

                        Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
                        https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
                        https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
                        https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
                        https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JJ FullmerJ
                          JJ Fullmer Testers @george1421
                          last edited by

                          @george1421 I was able to nab an L390 I put into production before the user got here and do a quick test with the adapter on this new kernel. Great success it worked! So this kernel appears to be working on both the usb-c ethernet adapters I have that are manufacturer specific Microsoft and Lenovo.

                          Which thing did you change then?

                          Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
                          https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
                          https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
                          https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
                          https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

                          george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • george1421G
                            george1421 Moderator @JJ Fullmer
                            last edited by

                            @JJ-Fullmer I just added the microsoft hardware ID to the downloaded realtek driver per Sebastian’s request in the linked thread. No other changes were made.

                            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                            JJ FullmerJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • JJ FullmerJ
                              JJ Fullmer Testers @george1421
                              last edited by

                              @george1421 So this one is good to be tested as the default kernel now?

                              Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
                              https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
                              https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
                              https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
                              https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

                              george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • george1421G
                                george1421 Moderator @JJ Fullmer
                                last edited by

                                @JJ-Fullmer Yes until the next thing goes wrong.

                                That wasn’t meant to sound bad. Its all part of kernel development. As new hardware comes out the drivers need to be updated to accommodate the new hardware IDs, even if the new device is exactly the same as the old devices.

                                So just to roll things up what was done with this kernel.

                                1. Activated the usb-c code in the kernel.
                                2. Updated the realtek 8152 driver from version 1.9.9 to 2.12.0
                                3. Added the microsoft 8152 compatible hardware code to the downloaded r8152.c file
                                4. Recompiled the kernel using FOG configuration base file against the linux kernel 4.19.65.

                                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                                JJ FullmerJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • JJ FullmerJ
                                  JJ Fullmer Testers @george1421
                                  last edited by

                                  @george1421 Any reason you didn’t want to try compiling kernel version 5.1.16 ? Noticed that there’s one of those in the kernel update screen of fog configuration.

                                  Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
                                  https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
                                  https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
                                  https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
                                  https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

                                  george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • george1421G
                                    george1421 Moderator @JJ Fullmer
                                    last edited by

                                    @JJ-Fullmer said in issue with netcard of dock gen2 of lenovo l390:

                                    Any reason you didn’t want to try compiling kernel version 5.1.16

                                    Well there are a few reasons.

                                    1. The 5.1.16 kernel is radically different than 4.19.65 and it hasn’t been fully tested with fog and imaging. It was created to see if an updated kernel would address a slow nvme imaging issue that impacts a specific nvme drive. It didn’t resolve the issue by the way.
                                    2. FOG 1.5.7 (the latest GA release) ships with 4.19.64, I wanted to build one off kernels using the kernel version closest to 1.5.7 release so if we have a difference in operation we could tell if it was the one off kernel or something within FOG.
                                    3. The config file on the fogproject github site is configured for FOG 4.19.64 it would probably work on the 5.x.x series, but sometimes the linux folks restructure the kernel and retire some options and bring on new options requiring different parameters.

                                    The intent of me building these one off kernels is to test new ideas and see if certain hardware need specific changes. Its possible based on testing these changes can be integrated into the FOG main line kernel. If I go off willy-nilly on my own using random bits it would be impossible for the developers to reintegrate these changes back into the main line kernel.

                                    I know it was a long answer to a simple question, but the intent is with a specific purpose.

                                    Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • JJ FullmerJ
                                      JJ Fullmer Testers
                                      last edited by JJ Fullmer

                                      @george1421 So I made the new one the default kernel and am Re-imaging the same surfacego that worked this morning and found something odd.
                                      For reference when I imaged it with the same image before it took 3 minutes (according to the image history).

                                      This is where it is at now…

                                      1114191407[1].jpg

                                      The speed has progressively dropped and is still dropping a little at a time. It’s been running for nearly an hour. It’s using the same storagenode and all that. Only difference is the kernel. Sadly I’m not actually 100% sure which kernel I used that was successful. Pretty sure it was the fog 1.5.7 shipped kernel though. I should really give them better names and take extra notes when testing kernels, so easy to mix them up. At any rate though, this is not a normal behavior.

                                      also, side note that I just noticed, it is frozen in the gui task progress bar at 65% which I assume is when it must have started to crazy slowdown, I had optimistically left it to run.
                                      0a7dd448-e160-4f4b-9002-64e34e068364-image.png

                                      edit : We discovered a network issue that may have caused the computer to lose its dhcp address and or connection during imaging (rouge dhcp server), will test again when that’s worked out.

                                      Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
                                      https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
                                      https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
                                      https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
                                      https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

                                      JJ FullmerJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JJ FullmerJ
                                        JJ Fullmer Testers @JJ Fullmer
                                        last edited by

                                        @george1421 I re-imaged the device with the original fog 1.5.7 kernel and it worked as normal again. So Although I can boot into fog on the new kernel, imaging freezes. It is not impossible that it was a network problem though, so the next surface I test, I’ll use the new kernel and a different switch.

                                        Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
                                        https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
                                        https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
                                        https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
                                        https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • JJ FullmerJ
                                          JJ Fullmer Testers
                                          last edited by

                                          @jps Have you had a chance to try the kernel @george1421 made?

                                          Have you tried the FogApi powershell module? It's pretty cool IMHO
                                          https://github.com/darksidemilk/FogApi
                                          https://fogapi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
                                          https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/FogApi
                                          https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/12026/powershell-api-module

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • J
                                            jps
                                            last edited by

                                            Hello,
                                            OK that works. Thank you.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 2 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post

                                            194

                                            Online

                                            12.0k

                                            Users

                                            17.3k

                                            Topics

                                            155.2k

                                            Posts
                                            Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project