Categories

  • 13k Topics
    115k Posts
    V

    Working in a VM (QEMU/KVM/Libvert) I found that attempting to capture (single disk resizable) a fresh ISO (June 2026 Windows 11 Enterprise) install where I enter audit Mode and then sysprep, the capture fails to resize during the FOG capture process:

    “An error has been detected! … Resize test failed! … Device name: /dev/sda3 … Space in use: 10535MB (16.6%) … Needed relocations: 1610313 (6596MB) … ERROR(28): Could not update runlist for attribute 0x80 in node 156294: No space left on device (shrink partition) Args Passed: /dev/sda /images…”

    Previously I had no issue capturing an install using Windows 11 Build 28000.1836 via FOG. The older build allowed for smaller VM disk size such as 40GB if I recall. The newer June 2026 ISO Build requires around 50GB for Windows 11Enterprise to install (else there is an error) so I allocated 60GB to the current VM (where I am getting the capture error).

    I found that on the June 2026 Build (28000.2269) if I set the EFI partition size to 2GB (still using 60GB VM disk size) during the installation using diskpart, complete the install, enter audit mode, sysprep, and then attempt the capture I am successful and there is no resize failure. Why does setting the EFI partition to a larger size allow the capture process to succeed? (I found this by accident as I was increasing the EFI partition for another reason discussed in the side note here.

  • Get the latest news on what's happening.
    184 Topics
    825 Posts
    A

    @Tom-Elliott I really appreciate that you are putting effort into providing more frequent releases, which makes it easier for everyone to deploy new security fixes in time. Keep up the good work!

  • View tutorials or talk about FOG in general.
    2k Topics
    19k Posts
    V

    Hello everyone,

    I am facing an issue with image capturing after performing an upgrade on my FOG server from 1.5.10 to 1.5.10.1886. Before the update, everything worked fine for me. The images were stored directly on the Synology NAS.

    My Setup:

    FOG Server: IP 192.168.10.220 (Debian 13) Storage: External Synology NAS with multiple virtual IPs (192.168.109.220 and 192.168.110.220). Storage Configuration: The Synology NAS is configured in FOG web UI as the Master Node for its storage group. The local Default storage node is NOT the master. Clients: Multiple clients on different subnets (e.g., 192.168.109.23 and 192.168.110.23).

    The Problem:
    The Partclone phase finishes successfully on the client machine. The image files are correctly uploaded via NFS directly to the Synology NAS into the /images/dev/[MAC_ADDRESS] folder.

    However, right after Partclone reaches 100%, the task gets stuck in the FOG Web UI (at around 70%), and the client screen shows the following PHP FTP error:

    Error returned: Type: 2, File: /var/www/html/fog/lib/fog/fogftp.class.php, Line: 709, Message: ftp_put(/images/dev/[MAC]): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory, Host: 192.168.110.220, Username: foguser

    What I have verified:

    I tested the FTP connection manually via CMD/PowerShell from a PC using the same foguser credentials. I am able to log in, mkdir, rename, and rmdir inside the /images and /images/dev directories on the NAS without any permission errors. If I move and rename the MAC folder manually inside Synology File Station from /images/dev/[MAC] to /images/[Image_Name], the image works fine. This setup worked flawlessly before the FOG server upgrade. The /images directory is NOT mounted locally on the FOG server itself (and never had to be). Verified FTP username and password on NAS and FOG. It's same.

    It seems that fogftp.class.php is incorrectly triggering ftp_put (trying to read a local file from the FOG server) instead of doing a remote ftp_rename directly on the NAS storage node.

    Has anyone encountered this bug after a recent upgrade, or is there a specific setting in the new version that I missed?

    Thank you for any help.

    Storage Node for NAS
    Storage Node for NAS.png

    Error on PC
    U10-PC13.jpg

  • Report bugs, request features, or get the latest progress.
    2k Topics
    21k Posts
    K

    @Valer Hi Valer,

    You can see my tutorial on using Secure boot with Shim, and my thoughts on what 2.0 means for Secure Boot with FOG here: http://forums.fogproject.org/post/158170

116

Online

12.7k

Users

17.6k

Topics

156.7k

Posts