Categories

  • 12k Topics
    114k Posts
    J

    @pillbox1234567 Thanks for the suggestion. I turned Viridian off on the cloned VM, and it did not make a difference.

    Interesting note that you’ve seen it cause boot issues on certain Linux VMs. I have not experienced that behavior yet but will keep an eye out for it.

  • Get the latest news on what's happening.
    184 Topics
    825 Posts
    A

    @Tom-Elliott I really appreciate that you are putting effort into providing more frequent releases, which makes it easier for everyone to deploy new security fixes in time. Keep up the good work!

  • View tutorials or talk about FOG in general.
    2k Topics
    19k Posts
    K

    @toalalife

    @KMEH Well, it must be another image I couldn’t attach.

    Which image are you referring to here? bzImage? If so bzImage is the filename of the kernel.

    I’ve honestly dedicated many hours to this without success. I’ve seen another project called foguefi (https://github.com/abotzung/foguefi), compatible with Secure Boot directly, without using MOK, and it works. It’s just that when you select options like quickreg or deploy an image, it takes forever. But the point is, it works with recursive boot enabled. It shouldn’t be that complicated.

    Yeah, I am aware of foguefi (I actually reference it in the original post), but I think you are slgithly mistaken, it actually is also using MOK. It chains grub via shim (which is similar to what we’re doing here, chaining iPXE via shim) and then re-implements the iPXE menus into grub. This works great, but requires a lot of maintenance effort if anything changes upstream in FOG.

    As you can see that project is currently archived, but FOG is also reasonably stable, so I’m not sure how long it will take for a breaking change to stop it from working. Part of the reason I devised this method is that (although hackier to implement on a user level), it doesn’t rely on any functionality that isn’t already present in standard FOG server itself for the most part and it could reasonably be implemented by the FOG developers should the wish to add it.

    Anyway, do you have a list of commands to configure it? Maybe I or the AI ​​is missing something.

    Sorry I’m a little lost here, commands to configure what? foguefi? If so I’m not sure, I haven’t used it myself so you’d have to ask the developer. If it’s commands to configure my method, the guide above should have everything you need.

  • Report bugs, request features, or get the latest progress.
    2k Topics
    21k Posts
    Tom ElliottT

    @heix75 No.

    Not because it’s not a QOL improvement (it is) but because what you see in 1.5.x.x is NOT what is the end goal.

    If you want to see what the UX is moving toward install the version of FOG on working-1.6.

    You’ll understand (I hope), then, why I’m saying this.

121

Online

12.6k

Users

17.5k

Topics

156.4k

Posts