• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. tmerrick
    3. Posts
    T
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 19
    • Posts 85
    • Best 9
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by tmerrick

    • RE: WOL working too good

      The FOGScheduler logs just show my 7 scheduled cron wake up jobs. I have disabled all of the FOG services and they still started up. Thus it does not appear to be FOG. I am trying to get a hold of a network analyzer to trace who is really sending this signal. Thanks for your help in understanding how FOG works, it has helped me narrow down who is causing the problem.

      I know it is a WOL being sent as my boot is SSD, then IP/PXE and it is PXE booting. Also, it is only happening in one of my three buildings. And only about 1/3 to 1/2 of the computers that I have in that building. So it looks like I have a rogue server somewhere in that building.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: WOL working too good

      I did not receive any packets from the server subnet using your tcpdump command. Unfortunately the computers in question are on a different subnet. I know that it is a WOL packet since the following shows up in the server messages log:

      Dec 16 23:04:02 clstfogi in.tftpd[16975]: tftp: client does not accept options
      Dec 16 23:04:02 clstfogi in.tftpd[16976]: Client 10.4.134.75 finished undionly.kpxe
      Dec 16 23:04:07 clstfogi in.tftpd[17006]: tftp: client does not accept options
      Dec 16 23:04:07 clstfogi in.tftpd[17007]: Client 10.4.134.78 finished undionly.kpxe
      Dec 16 23:04:09 clstfogi in.tftpd[17053]: Client 10.4.134.75 finished default.ipxe
      Dec 16 23:04:14 clstfogi in.tftpd[17111]: Client 10.4.134.78 finished default.ipxe
      

      The computers all boot to the SSD, but have WOL+PXE boot enabled. So I should not see anything unless it is a WOL boot. So it does not appear to be a FOG issue, but rather a rogue server on that subnet.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: WOL working too good

      Found about 140 rows, but they still turn back on. I even rebooted to make sure that nothing was in memory.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: WOL working too good

      There are only two scheduled tasks for deploying snapins to other computers. Power management only shows a scheduled 11pm shutdown, but then turn back on 15 min later.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • WOL working too good

      I have FOG 1.4.4 on RedHat and most everything seems to be working okay. Except that I have a number of hosts that get turned back on by FOG about 10-20 min after I shut them down (either manually, remote desktop, or via FOG power management). I have not been able to find anything in FOG’s logs to indicate that this is happening. I assume that I have something in my database that is causing this since is only happening on 35 of 280 computers. Any ideas of where to look?

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: FOG 1.3.0-RC-8 power management error

      0_1471461532857_st118-01-power.jpg

      The error that I had was a firefox problem.

      posted in Bug Reports
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: FOG 1.3.0-RC-8 power management error

      What privileges do I need to upload a picture?

      posted in Bug Reports
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: FOG 1.3.0-RC-8 power management error

      Windows 10

      posted in Bug Reports
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: FOG 1.3.0-RC-8 power management error

      How do you do that? It is whatever it loaded when the client updated. In the Programs and Features list there is no .net less than 4.5.

      posted in Bug Reports
      T
      tmerrick
    • FOG 1.3.0-RC-8 power management error

      I have a client with 2 power management cron jobs and the following error happens when I reimage the client:

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      --------------------------------PowerManagement-------------------------------
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       8/17/2016 9:26 AM Client-Info Client Version: 0.11.5
       8/17/2016 9:26 AM Client-Info Client OS:      Windows
       8/17/2016 9:26 AM Client-Info Server Version: 1.3.0-RC-8
       8/17/2016 9:26 AM Middleware::Response Success
       8/17/2016 9:26 AM PowerManagement ERROR: Data conversion using the DataContract FOG.Modules.DataContracts.PowerManagement failed
       8/17/2016 9:26 AM PowerManagement ERROR: Cannot deserialize the current JSON object (e.g. {"name":"value"}) into type 'System.Collections.Generic.List`1[FOG.Modules.PowerManagement.Task]' because the type requires a JSON array (e.g. [1,2,3]) to deserialize correctly.
      To fix this error either change the JSON to a JSON array (e.g. [1,2,3]) or change the deserialized type so that it is a normal .NET type (e.g. not a primitive type like integer, not a collection type like an array or List<T>) that can be deserialized from a JSON object. JsonObjectAttribute can also be added to the type to force it to deserialize from a JSON object.
      Path 'tasks.1'.
      

      I am not sure if this is a client and/or server issue.

      posted in Bug Reports
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: 1.3.0-RC-7: Cannot install new FOG client

      It had to do with an old 0.10.6 fog client not being able to run. I tried to update it with the 0.11.5 msi installer, but got the above error. I went ahead and reimaged that client. Now I cannot duplicate it on that client or a number of others. So it was probably my client that was corrupt.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: 1.3.0-RC-7: Cannot install new FOG client

      This is on a Windows 10 client using the msi installer.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • 1.3.0-RC-7: Cannot install new FOG client

      When I try to install the fog client manually, I get a JSON error while creating the settings file and it aborts installation.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: UserTracker not working in 0.11.2

      Confirm that it works in GIT 8259.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: UserTracker not working in 0.11.2

      Any idea if this is a client or server problem? The client seems to be forming the URL with the information in it. BTW this is not a new problem with 0.11.2.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: mass-delete power management options!

      I agree. There should be a delete all power management entries on the group power management screen.

      posted in Feature Request
      T
      tmerrick
    • UserTracker not working in 0.11.2

      UserTracker does not seem to be working. I see the entries in the fog.log file, but nothing appears on the Red Hat server via the reports or my own program.

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      ----------------------------------UserTracker---------------------------------
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       6/24/2016 8:41 AM Client-Info Client Version: 0.11.2
       6/24/2016 8:41 AM Client-Info Client OS:      Windows
       6/24/2016 8:41 AM Client-Info Server Version: 8241
       6/24/2016 8:41 AM Middleware::Response Success
       6/24/2016 8:41 AM Middleware::Communication URL: http://10.3.64.58/fog/service/usertracking.report.php?action=login&user=CI347-04\tmerrick&mac=18:66:DA:09:24:6C||00:00:00:00:00:00:00:E0&newService&json
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      
       6/24/2016 8:41 AM Middleware::Communication URL: http://10.3.64.58/fog/management/index.php?sub=requestClientInfo&configure&newService&json
       6/24/2016 8:41 AM Middleware::Response Success
       6/24/2016 8:41 AM Service Sleeping for 239 seconds
       6/24/2016 8:45 AM Middleware::Communication URL: http://10.3.64.58/fog/management/index.php?sub=requestClientInfo&mac=18:66:DA:09:24:6C||00:00:00:00:00:00:00:E0&newService&json
       6/24/2016 8:45 AM Middleware::Response Success
       6/24/2016 8:45 AM Middleware::Communication URL: http://10.3.64.58/fog/service/getversion.php?clientver&newService&json
       6/24/2016 8:45 AM Middleware::Communication URL: http://10.3.64.58/fog/service/getversion.php?newService&json
      
       6/24/2016 8:45 AM Service Creating user agent cache
       6/24/2016 8:45 AM Middleware::Response Success
       6/24/2016 8:45 AM Middleware::Response Module is disabled globally on the FOG server
       6/24/2016 8:45 AM Middleware::Response Module is disabled globally on the FOG server
      

      I am not sure about the last two entries. I think that everything is enabled for UserTracker as in the first part but there is never a middleware success response to the actual reporting of the logon.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: PXE chaining fails on SSD

      Yes, I have a working solution.

      It is failing on both Toshiba (Class 10) and Samsung (Class 20) SSDs. I am not sure what the difference from a plan old Samsung EVO and these are, but the EVO sanboots fine.

      I usually use PXE boot as they are student computer labs that I multicast 2-3 times a year.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: PXE chaining fails on SSD

      Yes, it was SANBOOT before. As I recall, the exit type failed also, but the grub first hard drive does work. Yes, they are traditional sata attached ssds.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      tmerrick
    • RE: PXE chaining fails on SSD

      They are bios with global exit mode. Yes, I have about 200 computers that work fine, but these are the first with SSDs. The host registration/imaging part works fine. It is just the chain to the local SSD that is failing.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      tmerrick
    • 1 / 1