• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Psycholiquid
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 4
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 39
    • Posts 499
    • Groups 2

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: Win 10 Ent. compared to Win 10 Ent. LTSB what would be the right decision?

      @jj-fullmer said in Win 10 Ent. compared to Win 10 Ent. LTSB what would be the right decision?:

      @psycholiquid In the past I have been creating scripts to create and deploy default profiles for each department. Giving a nice starting point with all the needed programs. UE-V looks intriguing, how do you use it? It looks like it’s a per user kind of thing from what I’ve read thus far. I would rather have a per department thing to start with then maybe add a user personalization backup kind of thing on top of that. If there’s any quick pointers you can offer, I would greatly appreciate it.

      It is definitely a per user thing. I use it to backup the users Application settings such as Outlook and WinSCP and others. IT works alot better than Citrix or the old way of doing roaming profiles (Not folder redirection) as it uses xml files and small zipped packages to keep settings.

      I can tell you that it is best to work with 1703 as the old version did not have t setup as a service making it a bit harder to work with but that is what I get for working in beta right? IT does work on the fly so it isn`t something you have to reboot every machine for either. Here is a custom script I use to backup users WinSCP settings:

      <?xml version="1.0"?>
      <SettingsLocationTemplate xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/UserExperienceVirtualization/2013A/SettingsLocationTemplate">
        <Name>WinSCP: SFTP, FTP, WebDAV and SCP client</Name>
        <ID>WinSCP-WinSCP-v-5-9</ID>
        <Version>1</Version>
        <Author>
          <Name>Jeremy Gravel</Name>
          <Email>user@email.com</Email>
        </Author>
        <Processes>
          <Process>
            <Filename>WinSCP.exe</Filename>
          </Process>
        </Processes>
        <Settings>
          <Registry>
            <Path Recursive="true">Software\Martin Prikryl</Path>
          </Registry>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>APPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path />
            <FileMask>winscp.rnd</FileMask>
          </File>
        </Settings>
      </SettingsLocationTemplate>
      

      This really just pulls their reg files ann some folders and files which I designate in the xml

      Example of the files being backed up to the folders:

      0_1506438499381_92b34776-9247-4c14-889f-874209bca6ec-image.png

      Here is another example backing up all version of Chrome (allows for updates to versions):

      <?xml version="1.0"?>
      <SettingsLocationTemplate xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/UserExperienceVirtualization/2013A/SettingsLocationTemplate">
        <Name>Google Chrome</Name>
        <ID>Google-Chrome-chrome-v-58-0</ID>
        <Version>1</Version>
        <Author>
          <Name>Jeremy Gravel</Name>
          <Email>user@email.com</Email>
        </Author>
        <Processes>
          <Process>
            <Filename>chrome.exe</Filename>
          </Process>
        </Processes>
        <Settings>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Google</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Google\Chrome</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Google\Chrome\BLBeacon</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Google\Chrome\BrowserExitCodes</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Google\Chrome\StabilityMetrics</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path Recursive="true">Software\Google\Chrome\PreferenceMACs</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Google\Chrome\Extensions</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Google\Chrome\NativeMessagingHosts</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Google\Update\ClientState\{8A69D345-D564-463c-AFF1-A69D9E530F96}</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path Recursive="true">Software\Google\Software Removal Tool</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\RegisteredApplications</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Clients\StartMenuInternet\FIREFOX.EXE\Capabilities</Path>
          </Registry>
          <Registry>
            <Path>Software\Clients\StartMenuInternet\FIREFOX.EXE\Capabilities\URLAssociations</Path>
          </Registry>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Crashpad</Path>
            <FileMask>settings.dat</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Crashpad</Path>
            <FileMask>metadata</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>Preferences</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>Secure Preferences</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>Visited Links</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>History-journal</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>Login Data</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>Bookmarks</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>Last Session</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>Current Session</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>Cookies</FileMask>
          </File>
          <File>
            <Root>
              <EnvironmentVariable>LOCALAPPDATA</EnvironmentVariable>
            </Root>
            <Path>Google\Chrome\User Data\Default</Path>
            <FileMask>Cookies-journal</FileMask>
          </File>
        </Settings>
      </SettingsLocationTemplate>
      

      0_1506438641417_8d70454a-dba2-4535-a875-5c1de334aa02-image.png

      posted in General
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Win 10 Ent. compared to Win 10 Ent. LTSB what would be the right decision?

      @x23piracy Like we have all said it is personal preference, and what you will to put up with, the Photo viewer thing that @Wayne-Workman brought up was a big issue here until I put my foot down and told them to use Word.

      posted in General
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Win 10 Ent. compared to Win 10 Ent. LTSB what would be the right decision?

      @x23piracy It has always gotten updates via online. All version I have used gets online updates so long as it is activated.

      posted in General
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Boot File Testing for SR

      @sebastian-roth

      1b67a056.efi: No hang on Init.xz
      3ae70be.efi: No hang on Init.xz
      9ccd8fe.efi: No hang on Init.xz
      993fd2b.efi: No hang on Init.xz
      6bd0060.efi: No hang on Init.xz
      6324227.efi: No hang on Init.xz
      a8f80a7.efi: No hang on Init.xz

      0_1506420669805_a452b761-e0e9-4a84-88bf-608cdc4dde81-image.png

      posted in Bug Reports
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Boot File Testing for SR

      @sebastian-roth Always have the setup LOL. I will get them tested between user migrations today. Pray for me. Users are retarded.

      posted in Bug Reports
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Win 10 Ent. compared to Win 10 Ent. LTSB what would be the right decision?

      @jj-fullmer you should look at UE-V if you want to keep lock screens between users and machines. I use it here and we can allows Windows 10 and Virtual Windows 10 users to keep the complete desktop experience. Wallpaper, Signatures, Outlook Cache. Even settings from applications that they setup such as mRemoteNG (remote desktop emulation program.) It is a pain to learn but what isn’t these days.

      posted in General
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Win 10 Ent. compared to Win 10 Ent. LTSB what would be the right decision?

      @wayne-workman Well they want you to use the App Photos now, but you cant get that in LTSB because of the no Appx packages. Really a dumb not thought out plan.

      posted in General
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Win 10 Ent. compared to Win 10 Ent. LTSB what would be the right decision?

      I use LTSB for Desktops and Laptops.

      Enterprise (without LTSB) for tablets. Its pretty simple if you need Store and table support go without LTSB. Other than that you wont need the other stuff.

      @Wayne-Workman The photo-viewer doesn’t work in 1703. It just ignores it.

      posted in General
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Driver Issues

      Doing it while live:

      https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh824971.aspx

      posted in Windows Problems
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Driver Issues

      Yeah dropping them into a folder isn’t going to work. Windows looks for drivers i the winsxs folder (No you cant drop them there either)

      That is why injection is good, do it before the image that way they are already there. There are ways to use batch files to install the drivers but I think it is a little messy.

      posted in Windows Problems
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Driver Issues

      @austinjt01 https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php?title=Create_a_windows_7_image_for_many_different_hardware

      Read about injecting drivers there, you don’t have to take the image down to do it, you can do it from inside the OS.

      posted in Windows Problems
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Driver Issues

      You should probably take and inject the drivers into the OS so it can see them natively.

      Use DISM to do this using i believe offline mode. I had a post around here a long time ago about DISM and injecting drivers.

      posted in Windows Problems
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Remote Session

      Try starting with what the issue is. We cant help if we don’t know what is going on.

      posted in FOG Problems
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Boot File Testing for SR

      @sebastian-roth No problem, I am really not liking these Surfaces and it looks like M$ is pretty much giving up them also. Go figure, they release something they no longer want ot make anymore.

      posted in Bug Reports
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: FOG Client / FOS report bios product key to database (Host) Activate through BIOS key (Deployment)

      @tom-elliott said in FOG Client / FOS report bios product key to database (Host) Activate through BIOS key (Deployment):

      The key is in the bios, and is what is required to activate your systems windows installation. Therefore, when you buy a new system, you purchase the key. How you store that key is up to you. I assure you, there is no “breaking” any laws by pulling the Key out of the BIOS. That’d be like saying it’s illegal for you to replace the hard drive out of the system.

      Thats the problem though your buying the rights to use the OS not the license. The key stays with the machine no matter what so if you throw the machine away you throw away the OS. That is why they set it up the way they do. I’m not trying to argue, although it looks like I am just letting everyone know ahead of time I would hate to see backlash. I don’t agree with M$ at all but it is their world and we are just living in it.

      posted in Feature Request
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: FOG Client / FOS report bios product key to database (Host) Activate through BIOS key (Deployment)

      OK after reading over all this. This is very illegal. You aren’t supposed to be pulling the OEM key out of the bios / firmware in the first place. Can you? Yes. Should you? No.

      If you were to get audited and they saw the FOG system was doing this you could get in very deep trouble.

      The real issue I see here is why. The reason I say this is the following. If you are sysprepping image with the OEM ISO and pushing that to each machine they will activate on their own without intervention you just have to set the rearm.

      I would personally steer clear of this as I can see M$ taking a stand on this and would hate for them to even look at FOG for that reason. Seems to be a disconnect in how your image is made that they are not auto activating.

      Personally I don’t like the rule of not imaging OEM machines. You bought them and they are all the same, they got their money you should be aloud to. It seems arbitrary that you have to load by hand…

      posted in Feature Request
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Boot File Testing for SR

      HEADipxe.efi: Hang on init.xz (attempted 15 times)

      5cf5ffeipxe.efi: No hang on init.xz (attempted 15 times)

      posted in Bug Reports
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Boot File Testing for SR

      @sebastian-roth said in Boot File Testing for SR:

      The other possible explanation I can comes up with is that this is all a timing issue and we see it working and sometimes hanging with the same binary… Could you try a dozen times? As well please try one of the non-hanging binaries several times.

      Yep not a problem

      posted in Bug Reports
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Boot File Testing for SR

      @sebastian-roth said in Boot File Testing for SR:

      @Psycholiquid Something must have gone wrong here. Maybe I uploaded the wrong HEADipxe.efi or your test failed somehow. Could you please re-test that one binary?

      HEADipxe.efi: Hang on init.xz

      Same result

      posted in Bug Reports
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • RE: Boot File Testing for SR

      @sebastian-roth

      302f1eeipxe.efi: wont boot at all on my surface
      694c18ipxe.efi: Hang on init.xz
      c917687ipxe.efi: Hang on init.xz
      e09331aipxe.efi: Hang on init.xz
      5cf5ffeipxe.efi: No hang on init.xz
      757ab9ipxe.efi: Hang on init.xz
      d37e025ipxe.efi: No hang on init.xz
      HEADipxe.efi: Hang on init.xz

      posted in Bug Reports
      PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid
    • 1 / 1