probably not (1.1) maybe, but that miner is not active by default.

this is known and expected behavior. Multiple Partitions - Single Disk recreates the partition structure of the original image, and you can not create partitions on a drive that are larger then the drive can contain.
the “way I can change that so that a 160GB HDD will work instead of requiring at least a 320GB” would be to use a Single Disk - Resizable image type, which shrinks the partitions to the smallest size possible for the data on the drive before pulling an image, then expands the drive to the full drive when downloading the image to a new computer.

Good to know…That means “video=uvsafb:mode_option=1024x768-16” would not make any difference, right?

Hi,

deleting them in filesystem will cause them exist in the db anyway, the normal way to delete them would be:

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZQFLL7f.png[/IMG]

Regards X23

[quote=“panthersfan25, post: 32133, member: 24585”]They are identical computers, set up exactly the same from top to bottom. I did notice that on the web management the [SIZE=4][B]bandwidth meter[/B][/SIZE] on the receiving end is really bouncing around from around 11 to 0 back to 11 back to 0 and I checked the eth0 drops and it is showing 45405, that seems extremely high, could that be causing the issue maybe a corrupted image?[/quote]

I also noticed an issue with Bandwidth – mine doesn’t show any activity at all. I am running 1.2.0

I had this issue when trying to use Ubuntu 14.04 and I used 12.04 instead and have not had any issues since.

Thanks Junkhacker that will help to plan hdd size for deployment!!