why would you want to blindly apply windows updates post image anyway? surely you should be going through some form of testing at least…?
maybe that varies in different environments and we have to air on the side of caution because if our systems go down/stop working people start dying… lol
@rmurra81 said in Do windows update on uploded image stored on fog server:
It would be very difficult to inject Windows updates into an image, but what this thread should be talking about is to spin up a VM with those image files. This would allow you to run updates, install programs, maintenance, etc. It seems stupid to me that the conversation didn’t go there. Why would you spend all your resources updating this FOG server software for it only to do windows update? Tom Elliott, that is a waste of time. Deploying an image to a PC and then running updates just to capture it. Just setup WDS and run a VM. This feature already exists and it seems like it wouldn’t be that difficult. Maybe some button to deploy to a VM within the FOG Server.
that’s how you should be building your images… build on VM, snapshot/create checkpoint before sysprep/capture… when you need to apply windows updates to your “image”, revert vm to snapshot/checkpoint - apply windows updates, snapshot again before sysprep/capture etc etc etc…
you’ll have a cleaner image building on VM and you avoid rearm restriction as theoretically your image only ever gets sysprepped once (as you revert to unsysprepped state before applying changes/update)
so that’s not a feature needed in FOG that’s a learning curve or a “suggestion” if you’d like that we need to teach FOG administrators…
“Maybe some button to deploy to a VM within the FOG Server”… that’s what the deploy task button is for unless i’ve been up far too long and i’m reading that wrong, you clearly don’t understand the architecture behind virtualisation if you think that could be implemented so easily. it would kill most environments just trying to implement that and most FOG Servers are being hosted on a VM already so then you’re talking about nested VMs and that’s just the tip of the iceburg on that head ache… can of worms springs to mind just to do something you can already easily and quickly do a thousand different ways as wayne and tom pointed out a few below
Edit: Just read the other thread you’re discussing this - if you mean deploy the image to a vm, you can do that like you would a physical machine, register the VM within FOG and deploy image, do your updates and maintenance etc etc and then capture, don’t think i fully understand your VM Feature request, maybe you could explain better?