Help configuring fog server with two nic cards.

[phil_guy]

@george1421 eth0 is my deployment interface and eth1 is my internet side interface. That exact configuration you see in my OP is exactly what I have set as currently. Even though my eth1 is hashed out in my configuration file, it still works. If i do a “ip addr” , it shows that its up and running. And I get internet, very slow though.

I do have a gateway defined for my eth0 which is my deployment LAN. I’m pretty sure i was suppose to leave that out or set it to "gateway 0.0.0.0 " I was unsure.

And the 192.168.224.82 is the IP address assigned to my deployment LAN. The other one is the management LAN that DHCP gave me that originally I change to a static address.

[george1421]

@phil_guy Please excuse my confusion but thats crazy, if the interface startup is commented out it should not on its own decide that it should start.

With that said remove the gateway address from eth0 since I hope the deployment LAN doesn’t have internet access, or could you more closely describe what 192.168.224.1 is? Also remove the dns-nameserver from that record too. Since everything of that nature will be coming through your management lan. Once that is done, please reboot your FOG server.

[phil_guy]

@george1421 the 192.168.224.1 is the address of my default gateway. I"ll remove that from the fog interface and reboot. Am I also removing the dns-nameserver from that entry as well?

As for the management nic, I’ll just try to manually bring down that interface and start over there. I don’t understand it either. I thought if its hashed out in the configuration file, it would automatically be brought down and wouldn’t be pulling an IP address from my local dhcp. But it randomly got an IP address and I can still get internet.

[george1421]

@phil_guy Sorry I’m dealing with a number of threads this morning so if I ask the same question, I’m sorry.

Your eth0 card is for fog deployment. Is this an isolated network or does this network have internet access? I had envisioned that you have 2 lans one for deployment and one for your business/management network. The deployment lan would be totally isolated and the management lan would have internet access just as your business computers have. Is this not how things are setup?

[phil_guy]

@george1421 No problem. I appreciate the help. and I apologize if i’m confusing you.

eth0 is suppose to be the fog deployment only while the eth1 is connected straight to the internet.

The set up you described is exactly how i’m trying to set it up. The deployment lan should be completely separate and isolated, no need for internet access. And the management lan connected to the internet for just regular daily task.

[george1421]

@phil_guy OK then your isolated network should not have a default gateway since there is no place to get off that subnet. The eth1 will pick up the default gateway from the dhcp server on the management lan. This is how it works. Once you update the interfaces file, reboot the fog server, then from the linux console issue a ip route command. You should see each interface and a default route, which should point towards your ISP router. If this is not the case then we need to dig into why the configuration is not reflected in the network interface configurations.

[phil_guy]

@george1421 Alright so I hashed out the gateway option for the fog server interface (eth1) and rebooted the computer.

I then ran the ip route command and got this…

Again eth0 is my fog deployment which I set statically as 192.168.224.82 and eth1 is my internet I got as 192.168.224.24

[george1421]

@phil_guy I wish I had a great emoji here because I see what you posted but I sure as heck don’t understand it.

Why does both eth0 and eth1 have the same subnet IP address? No wonder why things are a bit confused. Your eth0 should be on a dedicated/isolated switch / vlan or there is no reason to have two interfaces.

[phil_guy]

@george1421 I read around and some people said different subnets and/or same subnets and I couldn’t figure it out (My networking knowledge is pretty eh…).

So I should keep my fog server as is with the 192.168.224.82 and change my management one to something like 192.168.223.xxx OR vice versa and keep my management one and change my fog server? Do I have that right or am I even further off?

[george1421]

@phil_guy OK, first rule you need two different non-overlapping IP address ranges. One is for you management network. I assume you will make this what every your current business network uses. This interface (eth1) will have a default gateway set since you want it to get to the internet.

Your deployment subnet needs to be something else with no gateway set. Once this is configured reboot your computer again. Then run the ip and ip route commands. As long as the subnets are different FOG will know to send deployment traffic to the deployment LAN and management traffic to the management lan. Now if you change the IP address for the deployment LAN you will be in for a little work. (but this is the right way to go about it). With the network interfaces right, you will need to update the fogsettings file with the new IP address for the new deployment lan IP and then run thought the fog installer again. And then finally check the fog configration settings in the web gui to to make sure the right IP addresses are there to. Also/ finally look at your storage node settings for the FOG server IP. That should take care of all of the bits where the IP address hides. (this is the specific reason why I gave you the installation instructions in the order I did, to avoid this issue). You can work through this, you will just have to take one step at a time.

[phil_guy]

@george1421 Thanks for the guide. I’ll work through this and get back to you if things go well or if i run into any problems. I should of followed the set up like this when i started because the current fog .32 i’m using is set up like that. The management side has a 192.x.x.x and the fog deployment has something like 10.x.x.x

Again I really appreciate the help. Thanks!

[phil_guy]

@george1421 UPDATE: I followed your instructions and I got my system to work exactly how I wanted it too. I really appreciate the help. Thanks again.

Unfortunately I ran into a small hiccup during the deployment process. You’ll see the post soon once I get the photo uploaded haha.