Organizations Using FOG
-
said in Organizations Using FOG:
Organization Name: Västbergaskolan AB
Location Stockholm, Sweden
Approximate Number of systems: 800
How long: since 2009 -
Hi,
Organization Name: Université Rennes 2
Location (Optional) : Rennes, FRANCE
Approximate Number of systems: 2000-2500
How long: Since 2009
Add to this, if you want to be listed publicly on the WIKI, please provide a Logo you’d want used for this.
https://www.univ-rennes2.fr/system/files/UHB/SERVICE-COMMUNICATION/logosur2-png.zip -
Organizations Using FOG:
I got two organizations:Organization Name: Lycée Eugène Livet
Location: Nantes, France
Approximate Number of systems: 1200
How long: 3 years
Organization Name: E.R.E.A. La Rivière
Location: Nantes, France
Approximate Number of systems: 100
How long: 2 years
-
Organization Name: EMBL Heidelberg
Approximate Number of systems: 37
How long: 6 Years
We’ve been using this system to deploy our Computer Training Lab and it’s by far the best thing we’ve found, open source and paid.
-
Organization Name: Roma I.S.D
Location: Roma, TX
Approximate Number of systems: 1000 - 1500
1 High School
2 Middle
7 Elementary
1 Admin Building
1 Alternative SchoolHow long: 2011 (6 Years)
-
Organization Name: CemenTech, Inc.
Location: Indianola, IA
Approximate Number of Systems: ~100
How Long: 1 year … and loving it! -
Organization Name: Universitat de LLeida
Location: Lleida, Catalonia (Spain)
Approximate Number of systems: 1500
How long: since 2013
http://www.udl.cat -
Lampasas Independent School District
Lampasas, TX
1500 Systems
4 months -
Organization Name: The Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
Web: www.vstecb.cz
Location: České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Approximate Number of systems: ~400 and growing
How long: Implemented in May 2017
Can be listed on the Wiki.
FOG servers: 1 dedicated server
Additional Storage Nodes: None
Previous Imaging Solution Used: Ghost Solution Suite 2.0
Uses FOG Client: YES- Uses Auto Log Out: No
- Uses Client Updater: No
- Uses Directory Cleaner: Yes
- Uses Hostname Changer: Yes
- Uses Host Registration: Yes
- Uses Printer Management: No
- Uses Snapin Client: In near future
- Uses Task Reboot: Yes
- Uses User Cleanup: Yes
- Uses User Tracker: No
Got only Czech logo, hope you don’t mind.
-
Jefferson Regional Medical Center
Pine Bluff, Ar
1,500+ systems
2 1/2 years -
Global Callcenter Solutions
Pueblo, CO
900 Workstations
11 Fog Servers5+ Years
Thank you for your time.
-
Organization Name: Sheakley Group Of Companies
Location (Optional) Cincinnati, Ohio
Approximate Number of systems: 500+
How long:3 years
Started on 0.32 in another company. It actually helped me get this job due the popularity of my imaging process.
-
Organization Name: Martin Transportation Systems, Inc
Location (Optional) Byron Center, MI
30 Remote Locations
Approximate Number of systems: 500+How long:5+ years
-
@tom-elliott said in Organizations Using FOG:
Organization Name: Facultad de Informática Mazatlán (FIMAZ) - Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa (UAS)
Location (Optional): Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México
Approximate Number of systems: 200
How long: 1 year
Thank you, -
Organization Name: IUT de LYON1Location (Optional) : LYON FRANCE
Approximate Number of systems: 1200
How long: since 2011
-
Organization Name: Elisava Escola Universitaria de Barcelona Disseny i Enginyeria
Location: Barcelona, Catalonia (Catalonia)
Approximate Number of systems: 600
How long: since 2013 -
Organization Name: Indian River School District
Location: Sussex County, Delaware USA
Approximate Number of systems: 5200 PCs/6000+ Chromebooks/300 Apple Devices
How long: Since 2/2017 (Formerly Used Symantec Altiris Solution)
14 Locations - 1 master server with 13 storage nodes.
2 - High Schools
3 - Middle Schools
7 - Elementary Schools
1 - Special Needs School
1 - K-8 Magnet School with attached Administration Building -
@dclark said in Organizations Using FOG:
(Formerly Used Symantec Altiris Solution)
Glad you moved to FOG?
We realize that FOG is not quite as inclusive of a suit as Altiris. I can say its a hell of a lot cheaper and deploys many times faster. I use to administer an Altiris environment in a former life so I know the complexities involved. If you are looking to round out Altiris offerings, you could look into FOG + PDQ Deploy + PDQ Inventory and get pretty much what you had with Altiris for about $1000USD/year/IT Admin (all PDQ licensing spend) for an unlimited number of clients.
-
@george1421 We originally looked at FOG as a cost cutting measure but have found that we probably get more imaging done with less issues with it than my experience with Altiris. I have written a standalone PHP application that pulls data from the FOG database in order to inventory equipment, track power management, track user logins (by user), and track image aging and OS versions we have in the wild among other things. I use a batch file to collect and record software inventory records and a few other parameters and deploy it periodically via the snap-in system. I use FOG’s post image script to detect the machine and copy the appropriate drivers to the new install. In most instances imaging speed is tremendously better, usually in the 6-8gb range with about a 3 minute average for a 20gb image.
We originally re-purposed a used Dell T-110 tower server as the master and Dell 780 desktops as the storage nodes in order to evaluate the system and ended up running on that for about 6 months of production use. We have since upgraded for hardware reliability which was an easy migration compared to any other migration I have been involved with.
The only issue we have had that has not easily been solved either in house or on the forums is Multi-Cast but I believe that it is a network configuration issue on our end tied into VOIP operations, just haven’t had time to sit and follow the breadcrumbs.
So… Yes, we have found FOG to meet all our needs and then some. What it doesn’t include we can easily add with a little creativity.
-
@dclark Excellent, it looks like you fully embraced the FOG environment. Well done.
Just a comment on multicasting. Yes it can be difficult to setup. With a large and disperse network I can see where you might have issues because multicasting only is transmitted from the master node in each storage group. So in your setup it would only be practical on your main campus.
So I have to ask you a question. What one feature do you feel is missing in FOG that would make your deployments easier/faster/greener?