• Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Storage Node 1.1.1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
FOG Problems
3
9
3.1k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R
    Robbie McHugh
    last edited by Jun 18, 2014, 3:18 PM

    Hi all,

    Have added a storage node today and the installation went as planned however upon completing the installation and tailing the fogreplicator log nothing has happened, also if I go to the dashboard and select the node using the drop down menu on disk information I just get a “failed to connect to” notification. If however I click where the disk usage graph would normally be it would appear that the FOG server is pulling the Hardware Information from the storage node.

    Have ensured all usernames and passwords pertaining the storage node and storage node sql are correct so am a little lost 🙂

    Any help would be appreciated 🙂

    Cheers
    Robbie

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • R
      Robbie McHugh
      last edited by Jun 18, 2014, 3:51 PM

      Sorry just being a fool, for some reason the FOGImageReplicator service had not started, all working now yay 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        Robbie McHugh
        last edited by Jun 18, 2014, 3:52 PM

        Although replication is working, still get the “failed to connect to” on the dashboard, not too much of a concern though 😄

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          Wolfbane8653 Developer
          last edited by Jun 18, 2014, 4:44 PM

          Tom is currently working on this. Do you know the revision of 1.1.1 you are on ?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            Robbie McHugh
            last edited by Jun 19, 2014, 8:15 AM

            Hi Wolfbane,

            Version installed was from main download section, not sure how to find my exact revision but will have a look in a min 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jdorst
              last edited by Jun 19, 2014, 1:21 PM

              I am guessing that the bandwidth graph for the nodes are tied to the Disk Info issue?. Fantastic work so far guys!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • W
                Wolfbane8653 Developer
                last edited by Jun 19, 2014, 2:55 PM

                [quote=“Robbie McHugh, post: 30762, member: 24192”]Hi Wolfbane,

                Version installed was from main download section, not sure how to find my exact revision but will have a look in a min :)[/quote]

                That means you are on the release of v1.1.1. The node problem is a gui/mysql bug. This is just a cosmetic bug and will not effect the storage node functionality. This show be fixed in the next release. It may not be fixed in the next revision.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • W
                  Wolfbane8653 Developer
                  last edited by Jun 19, 2014, 3:00 PM

                  [quote=“jdorst, post: 30787, member: 814”]I am guessing that the bandwidth graph for the nodes are tied to the Disk Info issue?. Fantastic work so far guys![/quote]

                  No, this bug does not relate to the “bandwidth” issue. If you are having a bamdwidth issue please , make a new thread.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    Robbie McHugh
                    last edited by Jun 20, 2014, 8:53 AM

                    [quote=“Wolfbane8653, post: 30806, member: 3362”]That means you are on the release of v1.1.1. The node problem is a gui/mysql bug. This is just a cosmetic bug and will not effect the storage node functionality. This show be fixed in the next release. It may not be fixed in the next revision.[/quote]

                    Hi Wolfbane,

                    Yeah I thought so as I was more than happy with the replication results and the fact that everything worked, Graphs dont bother me too much as I rarely look at the gui 🙂

                    Been having a think, I have two sites that are linked by a stretched LAN and are around 2 miles apart, I have a storage node on Site B and the FOG Server on site A, do you think it would benefit more setting up the second node as a separate storage group and allocating the images stored on it to the machines on Site B. Thinking it would be a better way as opposed to pulling the images across the link. I can create additional storage nodes to facilitate multi-cast jobs on each site or is it a bit overkill? 🙂

                    Obviously I would have to have dedicated images for each site but as I have one image that caters for the 4 desktop models and 3 laptop models its not to messy.

                    Be interesting to see what your thoughts are.

                    Cheers
                    Rob

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • 1 / 1
                    1 / 1
                    • First post
                      3/9
                      Last post

                    189

                    Online

                    12.0k

                    Users

                    17.3k

                    Topics

                    155.2k

                    Posts
                    Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project