Hardware Currently Working with FOG v1.x.x
-
[quote=“Junkhacker, post: 33167, member: 21583”]also working
Dell Inc.Latitude E5540
FUJITSULifeBook T4410
FUJITSULIFEBOOK T730[/quote]Updated working devices page. Thanks Junkhacker!
-
[quote=“Wolfbane8653, post: 33306, member: 3362”]I can personally vouch for the HP DC7800’s working with Fog 1.x.x. I have about 150 of them and all are working correctly.[/quote]
What kernel are you using? We have Dell Optiplexes, Acer Veritrons, Toshiba L500s and Lenovo ThinkPads working but not the HP DC7800s. They were working (.32) prior to the upgrade to 1.1.2.
-
[quote=“SteeleV3, post: 33291, member: 24979”]I am unable to find a working kernel for the HP DC7800. Above and on the working devices page it is stated that it works with the default.[/quote]
Where is this failing?
Is it failing at ipxe or is it failing with a kernel panic. If a kernel panic, what kind of messages are you receiving?
-
It throws an errors just after this and the error is so quick there is no time to read it.
[IMG]http://i913.photobucket.com/albums/ac338/Reds34/Fog/hp7800_zpsb87803cb.jpg[/IMG]
-
Can you try capturing a video of the bootup. i can try to pause and slow it down to tell you what error. That said, this is not the kernel and as Junkhacker states on other threads you may want to try different undionly/ipxe files to see if it will help you out.
-
I took a video and was able to pinpoint the error: “Error 0x040ee119 ( [url]http://ipxe.org/040ee119[/url])”
I went to the URL. Can someone point me in the right direction in changing/updating the ipxe file please? -
Before you go down the road of trying to change out files can you find out if your network is using spanning tree protocol if it is are you guys on Cisco and have you enable port fast?
-
We are using spanning tree and port fast is enabled. We are a mixture of Cisco, HP and Netgear for now…
-
My Gasland is one of your switches isn’t responding fast enough you may need to look into DNS mask
-
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 33342, member: 7271”]My Gasland is one of your switches isn’t responding fast enough you may need to look into DNS mask[/quote]
You think DNS mask? Even if we have 6 other makes/models that work without an issue?
-
If you want you can try the .KKPXE file
-
Can you please explain " try the .KKPXE file" ? (novice here :))
-
using undionly.kkpxe instead of undionly.kpxe
-
What Joncas says is correct you could probably do a symbolic link or just copy the current kKpxe file as the kpxe I’m on my cell phone if you’re wondering why not giving more detail
-
.kkpxe did it! Thank YOU!
-
Can anyone else give me models that work but not on this page?
[url]http://fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/WorkingDevices[/url] -
I updated my post
-
[quote=“Wolfbane8653, post: 38373, member: 3362”]Can anyone else give me models that work but not on this page?
[url]http://fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/WorkingDevices[/url][/quote]All working with FOG 0.32 + undionly.kpxe and default bzImage
Tangent Pendant 5181LPB
Tangent Pendant 5161LPB
Tangent Pendant 5141LPB
Tangent Pendant 5131LPB
Tangent Pendant 5131LP
Tangent Pendant 2465LPB -
I updated the page. Hopefully, this will help other users out a bit.
-
Does anyone still have any of these machines? [url]http://fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/ProblematicDevices#Desktops[/url]
If you do would you be willing to at least test to see if these work with 1.x.x(iPXE)?
