• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Using a SSD Drive in a FOG server

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General
    5
    5
    1.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Z
      Zourous
      last edited by

      I wondered if this would improve deployment times. Has anyone tried it? Is it worth it

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Q
        Quazz Moderator
        last edited by Quazz

        My guess is it would help under load, but otherwise performance wouldn’t matter much (assuming you have quality hard drives currently), because the speed is generally limited by link speed and target client speed (both CPU and HDD speed are huge here)

        I run a FOG server with a regular (refurbished even) HDD and deploying to a quadcore with SSD gets around 10GB/min, whereas a HDD tends to top out around 7/8 GB/Min. Low quality HDDs get a bit less and clients with low power CPUs (think 6 year old celerons) get maybe 1/2 GB/Min

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • george1421G
          george1421 Moderator
          last edited by george1421

          The client (cpu & disk) and image compression selection has the majority of the impact on deployment times. Putting ssd drives in the client will help more with deployment times than in the FOG server.

          What are you seeing (GB/min) on your current unicast deployment?

          Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • THEMCVT
            THEMCV
            last edited by

            Yep, was using a 1TB Samsung 850 Pro and it worked great in an Optiplex GX620.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Wayne WorkmanW
              Wayne Workman
              last edited by

              I think the only improvement would be seen under high usage, like simultaneous unicast deployments. And even then, you’d only see that increase if you have more than a 1Gbps network link to the server. You’d need 10Gbps to see the difference, otherwise you will cap at 1Gbps which is already filled completely by mechanical drives with 3 simultaneous unicast deployments.

              Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
              Daily Clean Installation Results:
              https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
              FOG Reporting:
              https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post

              168

              Online

              12.0k

              Users

              17.3k

              Topics

              155.2k

              Posts
              Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project