• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PXE-M0F Fedora 23 server

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    FOG Problems
    3
    16
    3.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      purpleturtle99 @george1421
      last edited by

      @george1421 Yes my Fog server is on 192.168.1.102, the default Gateway is a TP-Link TL-MR3420 router.
      This install centos 7 line in the boot menu bug me immensely. As my DHCP conf file and the LTSP .conf file does not refer to this at all.

      LTSP file:
      port=0
      log-dhcp
      enable-tftp
      tftp-root=/tftpboot
      dhcp-boot=undionly.kpxe.0,192.168.1.102
      dhcp-option=17,/images
      dhcp-option=vendor:PXEClient,6,2b
      dhcp-no-override
      pxe-prompt=“Press F8 for boot menu”, 30
      pxe-service=X86PC, “Boot from network”, undionly
      pxe-service=X86PC, “Boot from local hard disk”, 0
      dhcp-range=192.168.1.102,proxy

      DHCP file:
      option space PXE;
      option PXE.mtftp-ip code 1 = ip-address;
      option PXE.mtftp-cport code 2 = unsigned integer 16;
      option PXE.mtftp-sport code 3 = unsigned integer 16;
      option PXE.mtftp-tmout code 4 = unsigned integer 8;
      option PXE.mtftp-delay code 5 = unsigned integer 8;
      option arch code 93 = unsigned integer 16; # RFC4578

      use-host-decl-names on;
      ddns-update-style interim;
      ignore client-updates;
      next-server 192.168.1.102;

      subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
      option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
      range dynamic-bootp 192.168.1.5 192.168.1.20;
      default-lease-time 21600;
      max-lease-time 43200;
      option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.102;
      option routers 192.168.1.1;
      filename “undionly.kkpxe”;
      }

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • george1421G
        george1421 Moderator
        last edited by

        Stick with me here.

        The TL-MR3420 appears to be a home router kit (or SMB kit). Are you running the native firmware on that or are you using a third party firmware like ddwrt?

        Before you installed FOG what was issuing dhcp addresses for this subnet? Was it the TL-MR3420?

        And lastly what is device 192.168.1.20?

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

        P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          purpleturtle99 @george1421
          last edited by purpleturtle99

          @george1421 it is running the firmware that it came with I haven’t mugged around with the firmware at all. OK let me explain. I used to have a Ubuntu flavor Fog server working with a Cisco/linksys wag120n and this combo worked like a dream for Win 7 boxes. Not so much for Win 8.1 and 10. As the company I work for are now starting to roll out Win 10. There fore I need a fog box that can make images for Win 10. Reading a bit up on the subject I decided to use Fedora 23 server with the TL-MR4320 and to do gigabyte interfaces. To speed up the image process up a bit.

          There is no device on the network for 192.168.1.20 and pings don’t work to 192.168.1.20 anyway. Basically the network is 1 X fog box(fedora 23 server) 1 X TP-Link router 1 X win 10 box

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            purpleturtle99 @george1421
            last edited by

            @george1421 Plugged the WAG 120N back in to see if it is router related and got the same error message?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Wayne WorkmanW
              Wayne Workman
              last edited by Wayne Workman

              @george1421 the menu in that screen shot I’m pretty sure comes from dnsmasq.

              If you have DHCP running on the fog server, you do not need dnsmasq.

              Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
              Daily Clean Installation Results:
              https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
              FOG Reporting:
              https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

              george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • george1421G
                george1421 Moderator @Wayne Workman
                last edited by

                @Wayne-Workman That is exactly what I was thinking. The next step is to packet capture the dhcp process. I was trying to avoid that but I guess we need to go down that path.

                @purpleturtle99 Did you disable the dhcp server in the TL-MR4320 to ensure that the fog server is the only dhcp server on your network of 3 devices?

                also just for grins can you key this into your linux console service dnsmasq stop does it return that it was running?

                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • george1421G
                  george1421 Moderator @george1421
                  last edited by george1421

                  @george1421 If dnsmasq is not running…duh you included the LTSP file contents, you have dnsmasq running! Please stop that service. You only need that if your dhcp server can’t supply dhcp options 66 {boot server} and 67 {boot file}.

                  Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • P
                    purpleturtle99 @george1421
                    last edited by

                    @george1421 U r the man ! and yes it would make sense I stop the dnsmasq service and it worked 1st time.

                    BTW on Fedora 23 server it refers you back to systemctl stop dnsmasq.service

                    Quick reg all done

                    george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • george1421G
                      george1421 Moderator @purpleturtle99
                      last edited by

                      @purpleturtle99 I’m glad you got it going.

                      Sorry for the 20 questions, but I knew something was going on that was not apparent.

                      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        purpleturtle99 @george1421
                        last edited by

                        @george1421 my newbie mistake! this is now resolved

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        228

                        Online

                        12.0k

                        Users

                        17.3k

                        Topics

                        155.2k

                        Posts
                        Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project