• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Nasty Problem - Fixed, Don't get caught out

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Windows Problems
    3
    11
    3.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Julianh
      last edited by

      I had a real pig of a problem today, and wanted to let you all know about it, so you don’t spend as many hours as I do finding it.

      The symptoms of a duplicate IP are, one box works, reboot the duplicate IP and the other box works, then the first stops.

      I imaged one server then sent the image down to 5 other machines. none of the other machines were accessible across the network, checked all the obvious IPs etc, no joy.

      It turned out to be the MAC address. The image had taken the mac address up, and all the imaged servers had the mac address from the source image.

      Easy enough to fix by defining a new mac in the adapter’s properties, but a pig to spot.

      I hope this helps someone else out there.

      Julian

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JunkhackerJ
        Junkhacker Developer
        last edited by

        was it a virtual network device? like the virtualbox host-only network adapter?

        signature:
        Junkhacker
        We are here to help you. If you are unresponsive to our questions, don't expect us to be responsive to yours.

        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          Julianh
          last edited by

          Hi,

          It is all physical, which is why it’s supposed to be impossible.

          Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JunkhackerJ
            Junkhacker Developer
            last edited by

            @Julianh said in [Nasty Problem - Fixed:
            …

            Easy enough to fix by defining a new mac in the adapter’s properties, but a pig to spot.

            what kind of network adapter was it then? can you give us the make/model?

            signature:
            Junkhacker
            We are here to help you. If you are unresponsive to our questions, don't expect us to be responsive to yours.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Wayne WorkmanW
              Wayne Workman @Julianh
              last edited by Wayne Workman

              @Julianh said in [Nasty Problem - Fixed:

              Hi,

              It is all physical, which is why it’s supposed to be impossible.

              Well now you have all of our interest. Please do spill the beans about all involved hardware AND the fog version you’re using.

              Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
              Daily Clean Installation Results:
              https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
              FOG Reporting:
              https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                Julianh
                last edited by

                The machines were built for me, but they use the realtek Lan card on the ASUS A88XM-Plus mother boards, Fog v 1.20 on unbuntu 14.04, 6 core AMDs with 32 GB ram and SSDs.

                I was imaging up Server 2012, which normally works fine, one image per Physical server normally. But it’s eating my storage, so I thought I’d try 1 image to multiple servers, looks like I’m buying some more disks.

                Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Wayne WorkmanW
                  Wayne Workman @Julianh
                  last edited by

                  @Julianh Would you be willing to build a test server with FOG Trunk on it and see if the problem exists in our developmental version of FOG? It’d be greatly appreciated and you’d be doing the fogproject a solid.

                  Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
                  Daily Clean Installation Results:
                  https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
                  FOG Reporting:
                  https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    Julianh
                    last edited by

                    Hi Wayne,

                    I have a VMware troubleshooting course to finish off updating, but afterwards I should have some time and more importantly kit free in early May. I could have a go then if that’s ok.

                    Julian

                    Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • Wayne WorkmanW
                      Wayne Workman @Julianh
                      last edited by

                      @Julianh Sounds good, ask for help if you need - don’t forget us!

                      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
                      Daily Clean Installation Results:
                      https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
                      FOG Reporting:
                      https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        Julianh
                        last edited by

                        I’ve been looking into this, and have spoken to one of our MCT instructors.
                        The machines I was imaging were Server 2012 R2, with Hyper-v. The Macs were duplicated on all the images. The instructor pointed out that Hyper-v moves the original Mac into software and uses the physical card as a glorified pass through device, so in effect the physical Mac becomes software, which explains how the situation arose.

                        I hope this helps anyone else imaging 2012 R2 Servers.

                        Could you mark this as solved and edit the title to “Nasty Problem - Fixed, Don’t get caught out when imaging Hyper-V Hosts”

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          Julianh @Junkhacker
                          last edited by

                          @Junkhacker
                          Well this was the interesting bit, it was all physical, the MACs imaged up were those of the physical adapters, but Hyper-v was “moving” the physical MACs to it’s internal network cards, and then of course imaging the software MACs up. Interesting, a pain but quite interesting.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post

                          140

                          Online

                          12.0k

                          Users

                          17.3k

                          Topics

                          155.2k

                          Posts
                          Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project