• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    nvme0n1p2 fatclone c: is not in a valid state

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    FOG Problems
    4
    42
    16.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • PsycholiquidP
      Psycholiquid Testers
      last edited by

      fsck.vfat: not found
      error 2 while executing fsck.vfat /dev/nvme0n1p2

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • PsycholiquidP
        Psycholiquid Testers @Sebastian Roth
        last edited by

        @Sebastian-Roth Yes that is the error I am seeing in partclone.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • PsycholiquidP
          Psycholiquid Testers @Sebastian Roth
          last edited by

          @Sebastian-Roth I can tell you that is the EFI partition of windows that is used to boot it, but I have made sure I am shutting it down cleanly. I have even set the sysprep to shutdown rather than reboot.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • S
            Sebastian Roth Moderator
            last edited by

            @Psycholiquid Are you able to mount the partition in debug mode?

            mkdir -p /mnt
            mount -t vfat /dev/nvme0n1p2 /mnt
            ls -al /mnt
            umount /mnt
            

            Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

            Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

            PsycholiquidP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • PsycholiquidP
              Psycholiquid Testers @Sebastian Roth
              last edited by

              @Sebastian-Roth yes it does mount and I can see the file structure

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Tom ElliottT
                Tom Elliott @Psycholiquid
                last edited by

                @Psycholiquid What if you add 1 to the d1.fixed_size_partitions file? Will it work then? It looks like it’s growing the EE partition when it really shouldn’t be.

                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                PsycholiquidP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  Sebastian Roth Moderator
                  last edited by Sebastian Roth

                  @Psycholiquid Looking through the partclone code I found out that there is a thing called “clean shutdown bit/flag” within the FAT (file allocation table). This sounds like it could be related to the NTFS dirty bit but is definitely a whole lot different - after all it’s FAT not NTFS. When searching the web for FAT and dirty bit a lot of people point you to the 0x41 byte (0x25 fog FAT16) of the partition which seams to be some kind of mount/fs-check/dirty marker as well but it’s definitely not the one partclone is complaining about! The one I found is relevant sits in the second reserved FAT entry. This is the best/simplest description I could find - and here another one. With that information I was able to replicate the error message you are seeing. The problem is I used a hex editor and dd to modify this on disk - so I don’t have an easy solution yet. Interestingly enough - even if partclone complains about it I could still mount the filesystem (just as you could). So I have no idea why partclone is checking this flag (where mount is not!) and who/what set this on your system?!?

                  I haven’t found any tool that would set/unset this “clean shutdown flag” for you. Linux fsck only un/sets the dirty bit AFAIK. Some say you can use windows chkdsk tool but I am not able to confirm this. In your case nvme0n1p2 is the EFI boot partition and I am not sure if you are able to run chkdsk on this partition from within a running windows system?!

                  I guess we could come up with some C-code to do this for you. Here is a nice example on how to read that flag.

                  I wonder if anyone else has looked into this yet? Is anyone aware of the difference between dirty bit and clean shutdown bit here in the forums??

                  Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                  Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                  george1421G PsycholiquidP 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • george1421G
                    george1421 Moderator @Sebastian Roth
                    last edited by

                    @Sebastian-Roth While I don’t have an answer for you on the shutdown part, I wonder if the developers of partclone would have checked this flag on a fat partition, just because of the nature of the fat I would suspect its not necessary. They must do this for a reason. Maybe they can provide a switch to ignore or even reset this bit in the disk structure if possible. Windows 10 is here to stay so they will run across this issue more often than not.

                    I wonder if the state of this flag could be dependent on the issue I posted before (from memory). I wonder if when the system is sysprepp’d instead of shutdown you pick reboot and then power off the device when it is working through post before it boots. (it may be impossible to catch because of the speed of the system).

                    Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                    PsycholiquidP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • PsycholiquidP
                      Psycholiquid Testers @Sebastian Roth
                      last edited by Psycholiquid

                      @Sebastian-Roth I was trying the chkdsk this morning within windows I had to add a drive letter to the partition. Not sure if it will work yet, taking a raw image of the machine (of course that works but not efficient) to make the powers that be happy.

                      chkdsk is what I usually did to any drive that gave this problem. Let me roll it back to the current bad state and try that and I will let you know the results.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • PsycholiquidP
                        Psycholiquid Testers @george1421
                        last edited by Psycholiquid

                        @george1421 I tried both reboot and shutdown, I am not sure catching it while it is EFI booting would have an effect, since it is already flagged as soon as it goes down. I think it is getting flagged during the sysprep due to I have rebooted it multiple times. Or maybe even being flagged during the switch to Audit mode. I am attempting the clear from within windows this morning to see if it helps.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • PsycholiquidP
                          Psycholiquid Testers @Tom Elliott
                          last edited by

                          @Tom-Elliott said:

                          @Psycholiquid What if you add 1 to the d1.fixed_size_partitions file? Will it work then? It looks like it’s growing the EE partition when it really shouldn’t be.

                          Not real sure what your talking about here.

                          Tom ElliottT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Tom ElliottT
                            Tom Elliott @Psycholiquid
                            last edited by

                            @Psycholiquid I kept thinking it was download for some reason.

                            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                            Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                            Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                            PsycholiquidP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • PsycholiquidP
                              Psycholiquid Testers @Tom Elliott
                              last edited by

                              @Tom-Elliott Ahh ok.

                              george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • george1421G
                                george1421 Moderator @Psycholiquid
                                last edited by

                                @Psycholiquid Can we isolate this issue to this specific hardware? Its unclear to me (at this distance) if your issue is with the M.2 disk, the device, or something crazy that win10 is doing.

                                Thinking about it, I’m not sure trying to duplicate this on different hardware is the answer either. Unless you could build a reference image on different hardware and then deploy to this troubled system.

                                Is it safe to assume you are not using mdt to create your reference image.?

                                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                                PsycholiquidP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • PsycholiquidP
                                  Psycholiquid Testers @george1421
                                  last edited by

                                  @george1421 Correct I am not using MDT to create them. I am however seeing this same result off of the Surfaces. So I will break down what I am using and that way we can all see what is happening:

                                  System 1) HP Z240 using NVME drive.

                                  I am creating the image by starting machine up and going through the normal windows start motions for a new machine (basically it is OOBE when I get it) I then upgrade the machine to Enterprise by switching the key. I then install all software I need and make changes. I then switch it into Audit mode (running sysprep). From there I place my Unattend.xml and launch it using elevated command prompt.

                                  System 2) MS Surface 4 Pro using NVME drive.

                                  I am creating the image by starting machine up and going through the normal windows start motions for a new machine (basically it is OOBE when I get it) I then upgrade the machine to Enterprise by switching the key. I then install all software I need and make changes. I then switch it into Audit mode (running sysprep). From there I place my Unattend.xml and launch it using elevated command prompt.

                                  So basically they are both using similar hardware in regards to the drives (Not sure on the MB part though)

                                  george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • PsycholiquidP
                                    Psycholiquid Testers
                                    last edited by

                                    And it just keeps getting better and better.

                                    So i took a RAW image of the PC and when I try to put that image back onto the device I get the following:

                                    0_1458044352460_IMG_0625.JPG

                                    Now I am thinking it isn’t the OS but the hardware. The reason behind this is when the machine is done imaging it comes up and does its sysprep motions just fine. and all my testing in the VMs were good also. But this doesn’t answer why the partition went bad either, I am thinking it is the Audit mode that causes that and I am building a new OS on the machine now to test the theory and find out.

                                    Tom ElliottT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • george1421G
                                      george1421 Moderator @Psycholiquid
                                      last edited by george1421

                                      @Psycholiquid said:

                                      @george1421 Correct I am not using MDT to create them. I am however seeing this same result off of the Surfaces. So I will break down what I am using and that way we can all see what is happening:

                                      Any thought about creating a standard image on MDT and then deploying to the surfaces since you are upgrading to enterprise anyway. This would give you a consistent image across your fleet of computers from tablets to workstations. The only issue I can see is ensuring you have the proper driver files available for the surface.

                                      The idea would be to build your reference image as a vm. If you use the lite touch method (with a little work) you can install windows, update it to the latest patches, install all software, do a last windows update then capture with fog for deployment. This is how we manage our images. Then next quarter rebuild the reference image again with the latest updates and software and recapture with FOG.

                                      I know this is off topic a little, but maybe its not the computer but the process that has issues (no offense intended). Its just something to consider.

                                      Ref: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/dn913725.aspx

                                      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                                      PsycholiquidP 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • PsycholiquidP
                                        Psycholiquid Testers @george1421
                                        last edited by

                                        @george1421 No I am totally open to ideas. Just because I have been doing it one way doesn’t mean it is the right way.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • PsycholiquidP
                                          Psycholiquid Testers @george1421
                                          last edited by

                                          @george1421 The problem with the surfaces is that it has to be done a certain way since MS’s key validation isn’t working at the moment. Also using Enterprise you don’t get the pen and apps like you would on a surface, so I am left with upgrading the OS, which in that case I have to reg hack the Surface in order to sysprep it.

                                          I haven’t even used MDT but I will read up on it today and see what I can come up with, you may be right though it may be the way I am doing it that is causing the issue.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • george1421G
                                            george1421 Moderator
                                            last edited by

                                            I really wouldn’t rule out FOG either, since you are swimming in new waters here with Win10, Surface Pro 4, partclone, and FOG. Any weak link could cause everything to fall down.

                                            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                                            PsycholiquidP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 2 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post

                                            268

                                            Online

                                            12.0k

                                            Users

                                            17.3k

                                            Topics

                                            155.2k

                                            Posts
                                            Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project