• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Most recent stable build worth using or fix for this error?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    FOG Problems
    5
    13
    2.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ch3iC
      ch3i Moderator @A Former User
      last edited by

      @bengillam Hi, I’ve that problem on a linux image since few month. I’ve to upload the image in debug mode and run that before imaging :

      fsck.ext4 /dev/your_linux_partition
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User
        last edited by

        @ch3i said:

        @bengillam Hi, I’ve that problem on a linux image since few month. I’ve to upload the image in debug mode and run that before imaging :

        fsck.ext4 /dev/your_linux_partition
        

        hi,

        thanks so I need to run whole of the upload debug operation here -> https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Debug_Mode
        if so at what point should I run your command above.

        Thanks

        Ben

        ? ch3iC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User @A Former User
          last edited by

          OK slightly embarrassingly may have spotted the issue, a stray 5800 hp which physically looks identical was in the pile of fresh machines i decided to image expecting it to be a 7800 would probably not help! Have now got an actual 7800 which I am trying to image.

          Also moved to svn build 4103 after reading some good things.

          Running the image operation as we speak, will see if this works and post back.

          Thanks

          Ben

          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User @A Former User
            last edited by A Former User

            @bengillam said:

            OK slightly embarrassingly may have spotted the issue, a stray 5800 hp which physically looks identical was in the pile of fresh machines i decided to image expecting it to be a 7800 would probably not help! Have now got an actual 7800 which I am trying to image.

            Also moved to svn build 4103 after reading some good things.

            Running the image operation as we speak, will see if this works and post back.

            Thanks

            Ben

            ok that didnt work same issue with the EBR signature - however the image now completes and DOES boot (since 4103 upgrade). Is it safe to ignore the error or is there something deeper causing it.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Sebastian Roth Moderator
              last edited by

              @bengillam said:

              EBR Signature for logical partition invalid

              See fractal13’s post here: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/2848/ebr-signature-for-logical-partition-invalid/2
              Probably same in your case, trying to deploy to an completely empty disk, hmm?

              Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

              Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User @Sebastian Roth
                last edited by

                @Sebastian-Roth said:

                @bengillam said:

                EBR Signature for logical partition invalid

                See fractal13’s post here: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/2848/ebr-signature-for-logical-partition-invalid/2
                Probably same in your case, trying to deploy to an completely empty disk, hmm?

                Hi yes, in this case had 5 machines supplied to us refurb with blank disks which I need to image. With my latest test finishing and booting don’t I need to worry?

                Can certainly test with a machine with non empty disk.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Tom ElliottT
                  Tom Elliott
                  last edited by

                  I’m fairly sure we do attempt initializing the disk, but the basis of the fogpartinfo (which I would still love to find a more suitable method to get partition names), is likely breaking things right now.

                  Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                  Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                  Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                  ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ch3iC
                    ch3i Moderator @A Former User
                    last edited by

                    @bengillam Hi, it’s before use the command fog to run the job.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      A Former User @Tom Elliott
                      last edited by

                      @Tom-Elliott said:

                      I’m fairly sure we do attempt initializing the disk, but the basis of the fogpartinfo (which I would still love to find a more suitable method to get partition names), is likely breaking things right now.

                      so im a little confused, so the error im getting is a bug? In which case 1) is it safe to ignore if my resultant imaged pcs are booting, and 2) is there a more stable build you could recommend? (other than the much older 1.2.0 version)

                      Thanks
                      Ben

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        Sebastian Roth Moderator
                        last edited by

                        1. From my point of view it’s not a bug. Save to ignore.
                        2. There is no stable build newer than 1.2.0 at the moment. But Tom has reworked the scripts and you are more than welcome to upgrade to the latest trunk and test things.

                        Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                        Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        210

                        Online

                        12.1k

                        Users

                        17.3k

                        Topics

                        155.4k

                        Posts
                        Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project