• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Most recent stable build worth using or fix for this error?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    FOG Problems
    5
    13
    2.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User
      last edited by

      Hey all, had fog running fine for a while and it decided to fall over and started giving me strange NFS errors. Spent forever trying to find source of problem and decided it wasnt worth wasting time and the build was fairly old at that point.

      Decided to just build a new box however having issues here.

      Latest build from SVN fails to install and dies at setting up and starting dhcp. So thought i would look for an older build and read a few bits and pages rtalking about r3559 have installed this and it seems to install fine and take an image and reboot as expected, however on trying to put the image back down to a pc i am getting

      Erasing current MBR/GPT Tables… EBR Signature for logical partition invalid: Read: 0x000, but should be 0xAA55. Error reading logical Partitions, list may be truncated.

      Then it reboots itself a few moments later and drops me at a grub rescue prompt.

      Server machine is an AMD Athlon X2 (if that makes a difference) 4gb ram, running xubuntu 14.04.3 and build 3559 of fog.

      Client is a HP 7800 SFF PC.

      Image taken from reference 7800 SFF and running Xubuntu 14.04.3

      Settings for image are

      OS: Linux
      Image Type Single Disk Resizable
      Partition: Everything
      Compression :9

      Same settings as ive been using for a while without issues.

      Not sure if its just a dodgy build or me?

      Either way not sure if this is an easy fix or If there is a better build I can use.

      Not too bothered about being bleeding edge but something relatively stable. The official stable release has issues with Vista resizable images so not usable for some of our images.

      Any help much appreciated.

      Thanks

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • george1421G
        george1421 Moderator
        last edited by

        First, what is the host OS that FOG is running under?
        Was this system running under the 1.2.0 prior to you upgrading to the latest SVN?

        I think we need to divide your issue into two parts

        1. FOG not installing correctly
        2. The image not deploying correctly (which may be a symptom of #1)

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by

          Hi sorry for confusion.

          Story follows as

          1. My original box was 3036 - working stable for some time, developed an error complaining about mounting nfs and checking for .mntcheck files - tried the sugggested fixes of touching the files but no luck. So decided to take a fresh box and make another fog server.

          2. installed xubuntu 14.04.3 as stated above as host os. Installed latest svn on friday. Install died at dhcp setup. Figured it was a broken build so wiped my machine back to fresh manually and updated.

          3. Tried with an older build 3559 - This installs absolutely fine. Created an image , added a host and performed an upload all with no errors.

          4. Try to deploy and get

          Erasing current MBR/GPT Tables… EBR Signature for logical partition invalid: Read: 0x000, but should be 0xAA55. Error reading logical Partitions, list may be truncated.

          Hope that makes a little more sense.

          I could I suppose try going back to 3036 though this build didnt move fresh images from the dev folder to their correct folder. Whilst not a deal breaker was a bit annoying.

          ch3iC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ch3iC
            ch3i Moderator @A Former User
            last edited by

            @bengillam Hi, I’ve that problem on a linux image since few month. I’ve to upload the image in debug mode and run that before imaging :

            fsck.ext4 /dev/your_linux_partition
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User
              last edited by

              @ch3i said:

              @bengillam Hi, I’ve that problem on a linux image since few month. I’ve to upload the image in debug mode and run that before imaging :

              fsck.ext4 /dev/your_linux_partition
              

              hi,

              thanks so I need to run whole of the upload debug operation here -> https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Debug_Mode
              if so at what point should I run your command above.

              Thanks

              Ben

              ? ch3iC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User @A Former User
                last edited by

                OK slightly embarrassingly may have spotted the issue, a stray 5800 hp which physically looks identical was in the pile of fresh machines i decided to image expecting it to be a 7800 would probably not help! Have now got an actual 7800 which I am trying to image.

                Also moved to svn build 4103 after reading some good things.

                Running the image operation as we speak, will see if this works and post back.

                Thanks

                Ben

                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @A Former User
                  last edited by A Former User

                  @bengillam said:

                  OK slightly embarrassingly may have spotted the issue, a stray 5800 hp which physically looks identical was in the pile of fresh machines i decided to image expecting it to be a 7800 would probably not help! Have now got an actual 7800 which I am trying to image.

                  Also moved to svn build 4103 after reading some good things.

                  Running the image operation as we speak, will see if this works and post back.

                  Thanks

                  Ben

                  ok that didnt work same issue with the EBR signature - however the image now completes and DOES boot (since 4103 upgrade). Is it safe to ignore the error or is there something deeper causing it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    Sebastian Roth Moderator
                    last edited by

                    @bengillam said:

                    EBR Signature for logical partition invalid

                    See fractal13’s post here: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/2848/ebr-signature-for-logical-partition-invalid/2
                    Probably same in your case, trying to deploy to an completely empty disk, hmm?

                    Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                    Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      A Former User @Sebastian Roth
                      last edited by

                      @Sebastian-Roth said:

                      @bengillam said:

                      EBR Signature for logical partition invalid

                      See fractal13’s post here: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/2848/ebr-signature-for-logical-partition-invalid/2
                      Probably same in your case, trying to deploy to an completely empty disk, hmm?

                      Hi yes, in this case had 5 machines supplied to us refurb with blank disks which I need to image. With my latest test finishing and booting don’t I need to worry?

                      Can certainly test with a machine with non empty disk.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Tom ElliottT
                        Tom Elliott
                        last edited by

                        I’m fairly sure we do attempt initializing the disk, but the basis of the fogpartinfo (which I would still love to find a more suitable method to get partition names), is likely breaking things right now.

                        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                        Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                        Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ch3iC
                          ch3i Moderator @A Former User
                          last edited by

                          @bengillam Hi, it’s before use the command fog to run the job.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            A Former User @Tom Elliott
                            last edited by

                            @Tom-Elliott said:

                            I’m fairly sure we do attempt initializing the disk, but the basis of the fogpartinfo (which I would still love to find a more suitable method to get partition names), is likely breaking things right now.

                            so im a little confused, so the error im getting is a bug? In which case 1) is it safe to ignore if my resultant imaged pcs are booting, and 2) is there a more stable build you could recommend? (other than the much older 1.2.0 version)

                            Thanks
                            Ben

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              Sebastian Roth Moderator
                              last edited by

                              1. From my point of view it’s not a bug. Save to ignore.
                              2. There is no stable build newer than 1.2.0 at the moment. But Tom has reworked the scripts and you are more than welcome to upgrade to the latest trunk and test things.

                              Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                              Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1 / 1
                              • First post
                                Last post

                              135

                              Online

                              12.0k

                              Users

                              17.3k

                              Topics

                              155.2k

                              Posts
                              Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project